DUAL 1229Q TurnTables
DUAL 1229Q TurnTables
USER REVIEWS
[May 06, 2021]
shemikasoraya
Strength:
These are the good point >>Sound Reproduction/Play Quality; Durability; Quiet Operation; Looks; Bang For Buck; Platter Weight. | Mice Control Weakness:
Nothing to complain about as of now. Purchased: New
|
[Jan 07, 2018]
MARVIN
AudioPhile
I have had my 1229Q since 1974 it has been out of its original box 2 times this is the best turntable you can use for recording or just listening to music. I used to record a lot music on cassettes for my Walkman some of you won't know
|
[May 21, 2017]
Magnus
Audio Enthusiast
Nowadays its getting more difficult to even find a good second hand Dual 1229, its quite a pity. Other than ebay, do you know of any other sites, folks? |
[Oct 22, 2007]
Tuch
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great build and sound quality. Though I don't play multiple records, it is capable of doing this.
Weakness:
I had to lube the idler linkage previously and later on I discovered that the linkage that allows the auto shut off feature to operate also needed oiling. This caused the motor to stay running, eventually making a scraping sound (and strobe lamp on), but because the idler wheel doesn't contact the motor capston and platter when it is in the off position, the platter doesn't turn and I didn't know the power switch wasn't being tripped to shut it off.
Dual TT Model 1229
Similar Products Used: I own four other TT's, none sound as good as the Dual 1229. |
[May 07, 2007]
elduque
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Sound Reproduction/Play Quality; Durability; Quiet Operation; Looks; Bang For Buck; Platter Weight
Weakness:
Dustcover will break at the bend stresspoint on these....almost guaranteed. After stumbling across a dozen or so reviews on the Dual 1229Q, I couldn't help but sign up and offer my sentiments for this great piece of audio gear.
Similar Products Used: Garrard; Pioneer; BIC |
[Apr 03, 2007]
Old-Hi-Fi-Nut
AudioPhile
Strength:
Tremendous build quality... Dead silent operation....
Weakness:
None that come to mind Frustrated by not being able to walk across the room when using my Linn Sondek, I dug out my old Dual 1229. After completely dissembling the turntable, I removed all of the 'automatic' mechanisms from the beneath the table in order to make it fully manual. Next, I removed the Dual tonearm and replaced it with a NOS Grace 747, and NOS Pickering SVX3000 cartridge.
Similar Products Used: Linn Sondek LP12, Aristion RD 11s |
[Apr 03, 2007]
Old-Hi-Fi-Nut
AudioPhile
Strength:
Tremendous build quality... Dead silent operation....
Weakness:
None that come to mind Frustrated by not being able to walk across the room when using my Linn Sondek, I dug out my old Dual 1229. After completely dissembling the turntable, I removed all of the 'automatic' mechanisms from the beneath the table in order to make it fully manual. Next, I removed the Dual tonearm and replaced it with a NOS Grace 747, and NOS Pickering SVX3000 cartridge.
Similar Products Used: Linn Sondek LP12, Aristion RD 11s |
[May 05, 2006]
Quietlymknnoise
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
The best turntable you can find. I have Listened to my CD-4 Records for several years. I have just taken it to Adopt-A-Dual for a tune up. I know my Ghost will be able to play this turntable after me. |
[Nov 19, 2003]
JPL
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Engineering, wieght of platter, high trackability with a heavy cartridge, style.
Weakness:
Needs to be looked after and regularly serviced. Availability of parts (get an old donor). If the pitch correction starts to get extreme, regrease/reoil the mechanisms and adjust the idler wheel. I obtained a 1229Q and 1229 from an elderly man who had owned the Q and his brother who had owned the other. Also thrown in was a Shure V15 III and an m97. A pretty good deal for less than US$50. I decided to use the Q in my system and the other for parts. I stripped the Q, regreased and oiled it. You can find the service manual in pdf form on the net which is worth having as you need different grades of oil and grease to apply to different parts of the turnable. Fortunately the idler wheel on the Q was as new. I had a few problems with the automatic return mechanism but am perservering with it as I cant see the point of having all those levers (which dont make too much noise)and German engineering sittin there doing nothing. To disconntect it for manual operation seems to defeat the point of the turntable. The gloriously heavy platter takes longer than two minutes to stop spinning! I also replaced the rca leads with my own copper silver leads. I was having problems with sheilding them but have now disconnected the muting operation and grounded through the mains plug. The cables are shielded and everything seems to work well with crystal highs (I realise this is unconventional). The silver hybrid cable is a good mix with the Shure V15. The Q is a great turnatble which can track very light weights with a heavy cartridge. It does not perform so well with my Sumiko blue point as it losses bass (but gains mid and high range definiton). When choosing a cartridge be careful I understand that low compliance cartridges dont work well with the tonearm. Go with the older shure cartridges. As mentioned in the other reviews, the great strength of the table is the platter. Its weight and strong motor means little wow or flutter, if the idler wheel is adjusted correctly. The big problem is the base that the turntable sits on. These either need to be heavily damped or replaced with something much heavier, like what some people keep old Garrards on. The heavier the better, which will bring more bass and solid presentation to your music. I use the turntable with a Rotel pre amp, Perreaux PMF 1550 power amp and Systemdek System 990 speakers whcih provide a very clear sound. The turnable is a great counterpoint for my system which is quite dry and analytical off my modified Marantz Cd-63. The Q isnt an Oracle or even a Rega but at the cost its a great buy capable of presenting detail and depth as long as it is serviced and has been looked after well. My rating should be read in the light of the criterea, i.e. I'm not giving it five stars against a newer turnable, but it is "far better than you imagined". I love its quirkyness and total over engineering and wont swap it until I can afford the kind of tuntable that will probably cause my girlfriend to leave me. Similar Products Used: Luxman tt, Rega P3. |
[Jul 13, 2003]
James Barclay
AudioPhile
Strength:
Trackability, vibration free, no wow or flutter and steady as a rock.
Weakness:
The 1229 had too many imbedded features, like a little magnified porthole, with a focussing ring, to see the speed trueness, those little levers which will someday wear out, the fact that it is not belt driven, but idler wheel driven (but you can get repalcement for about $50 right now), a Rube Goldberg mess of arms, springs, screw adjustments and standoff bushings on the inside, way overdone, and why oh why did they try to make the left thumb lever try to accomplish so much? this thing is way overbuilt. I guess that's what you get when someone builds a dream machine. The 1229Q came pretty much naked with a lot of dust on it, the manual, a layout and spindles. I took it home and found that it did not work at all, but that this, I found out, was due to the change lever being jammed. Also, someone had tried to take apart the shell head and that turned out to be the worst problem. Also, one of the levers was stripped. First, I took the turntable off its wooden United Audio base and turned it over to see if any parts were missing. They were not, but one spring had come loose, which I reattached. I next took off the idler wheel and its E washer and examined them both. No wear here. I reattached them. I also manually unscrewed the transfer arms and inspected the gears. OK. I did find some dust mixed with oil which I did a nice component spray job on and relubricated all the parts with a clear Radio Shack machine oil anyone can get (It even fits into you shirt pocket, if you want.) There were two small shafts and thumb knobs, one of which had come loose. The inside of one of the knobs was stripped. I pressed a small brass bushing onto it and drilled out one side of the knob with my Dremel, inserted an eyeglass screw and tighted that down on fit. What I thought was the short spindle truned out to be the plastic holder for the platter (a very heavy platter, by the way). So, I simply went to a small machine shop and, using my specs, they made a new one. (What is special is that this spindle has a round middle cover, so the spindle not only fits the center hole, but also covers the center fit for the platter. (Cost: $20 and in noncorrosive steel. It fit perfectly). The very bulky plastic dust cover, which opens from the front and actually fits over all the turntable components, was in poor shape. I simple used plastic buffing compound and a buffing pad on my hand drill. It took care of all that. (the smokey cover is that color all the way through, thank goodness.) The hard part was refitting the cartridge shell. I had to do some rewiring which was very tedius because these wires and their connectors were the smallest I had ever seen. I had to get inventive and make sure the wires were not too long. The shell fit after a few experiments, but I was proud of what I had done. Cost: About ten hours work. The glue on one side corner of the United Audio base had dried loose. I simply took off the glue, put a new tricorner and glued it up, andput a couple of clamps on and left it for a few hours. I checked the motor, a two poled type and racked it up for test. It passed with flyiong colors, though I did notice some sort of burned looking discoloration on the shaft that I still can't identify. Perhaps there was some wear from where someone had played with it. I don't know. When I put the cover back on, the two guides and forks that fit the two pieces of the cover together fell off. I simply shimmed them with a little built up liquid plastic and they fit well and stayed on. Frotunately, the 1229Q had come with a nearly unused Sure 887, a special cartridge and needle that was especially made for quad. I have never been ableto find a replacement. Testing it on a simple recording proved nice. I adjusted the tracking and the weight with a Sure cantilever/mirror stylus force gauge (you can still buy these) to 1GM. Much better. The true test came when I attached the Dual to a Marantz Quad preamp and two Pioneer SX828 recievers and mounted a recording of John Payne's quadraphonic recording of "Spaced Out Bach". (1973). My speakers were two sets of restored old Bose Studiocraft 440A monitors from 1972. All I can say is: "It was damned worth the effort." Similar Products Used: The only turntable that would have even compared to it in its day was the Tandberg, which was much lighter, thinner, a belt drive and simpler in almost every way. But then, it doesn't show all its bel |