Music Hall MMF-2.1 TurnTables
Music Hall MMF-2.1 TurnTables
USER REVIEWS
[Nov 12, 2020]
stevens
Strength:
Build and material quality not up to the standards of other tables on the market. For the price, it's a bit much. Weakness:
custom stickers | print stickers | business printing | printing company Purchased: Used
|
[May 23, 2010]
frenchmon
Audio Enthusiast
Ok...I've read many reviews about the Muisc Hall 2.1 with the Tracker or Goldring Elan and the pros and cons about it.
|
[Dec 18, 2005]
starguygwb
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
For an entry level table, lack of rumble(with dustcover up). Simple set up.
Weakness:
Cartridge realy needs to be upgraded. I see alot of people complain about this table as if it were a high end product, its not! It's a very good entry level doorway into Vinyl. I wanted to see how a new table would sound like compared to my directdrive Tecnnics, and the mmf 2.1 seemed least exspensive enough to do the job. The cartridge that came with the table didn't stay on very long, I replaced it with a Ortofon super om30. It got alot quieter,and seemed to open up some. I can't believe home quiet this table is.One thing of note, open the dust cover when using and it gets rid of any rumble that I can hear. And no interference with my Martin Logan subwoofer at all. I must admit that I'm going to upgrade soon, but after all this was a test to see if new gear outdoes the old. I think anyone looking at a low price point, or a step toward a higher end rig wouldn't go wrong. I've heard people complain about the bad wiring. I've always treated my gear with the utmost care, from my directdrive table to my B&W 805s speakers. My point is some people treat their gear kinda rough and then wonder why it breaks when others use their gear for years without mishap. Similar Products Used: Tecnnics SL-DD33 |
[Nov 05, 2005]
7.62Matt
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Inexpensive, easy to set up
Weakness:
Cheap cartridge I bought this turntable for my second system, and I have enjoyed it, after a few changes. It appears to be well made, and it is simple. The cartridge that was supplied was not of my taste. I didn't like it at all, to the point I wasn't using it at all. One day, I came across a slightly used Grado red cartridge at a good deal, so I gave it a try. There is no comparison, this turntable came alive! There is a bit of rumble, but there are ways to reduce this. Playing Classic rock, this is the budget set up. Similar Products Used: Sota Sapphire/ Benz Micro Gold Micro Sieki/ Grado Gold |
[Apr 27, 2005]
Rudy64
AudioPhile
Strength:
Good entry-level table for light usage.
Weakness:
Build and material quality not up to the standards of other tables on the market. For the price, it's a bit much. While this is a good entry-level "audiophile" turntable, I can't recommend it due to its rather flimsy build quality and use of cheaper materials. The biggest complaint I've seen on this model are that the delicate tonearm wiring is easy to break off; in fact, mine had one wire broken off inside the arm, which means either the tonearm would need to be rewired, or the tonearm replaced with a new one. (Music Hall wants $160 for a new arm.) The anti-skating is also not very adjustable--you are given only three "notches" on a post to adjust it. The motor uses a clever rubber suspension system to isolate it from the turntable base (it is suspended by a clamped-down BUNA o-ring), but the torque of the motor also tilts the motor slightly at an angle relative to the platter, which could be a potential future problem. The dust cover hinges are nothing more than L-shaped rods held in place under friction, unlike true spring-loaded hinges in other turntables. The included cartridge is not all that great--at this level, you're better off replacing it with something like a Shure M97XE that has better tracking and a neutral tonal balance. (Music Hall should offer this without the cartridge as an option.) I could recommend this to someone who wanted a budget, entry-level "audiophile" turntable for lighter usage, but if you're going to be playing a lot of vinyl, I'd look elsewhere for something more sturdy. I've heard of too many other dissatisfied MMF-2.1 owners to feel good about recommending this to everyone. |
[Jun 14, 2004]
drbrousters
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Musicality, build quality, cost.
Weakness:
Noise Bought this demo from audio advisor and a demo Grado Red cartridge. The $269 included shipping with mounted cartridge. I will say that this combination is a great way to experience vinyl 2 channel audio. After listening to CD's on a good quality Player and a few LP's on a cheap Turntable, this is a treat. It helped me better understand the reason audiophiles use the term "musical" to describe good quality sound. It truly is a musical combination. The instruments sound like instruments. Bass is well-defined and solid. Guitars sound like they are being strummed. Everything is crisp and natural. I'm glad I did this. For those who have had a less than positive experience, try a cartridge updgrade. That having been said, I will not ignore the negatives: 1) Surface noise and scratches. They are atill there and still annoying. 2) Amplifier hum. I grounded this turntable to both the pre-amp and amp, but a hum is still audible (though very low in volume). If those things keep you from enjoying the music, spend your money on a CD player. Similar Products Used: Technichs SL-Q300, Phillips 212A |
[Dec 13, 2003]
rppb
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
price, value
Weakness:
not built like a tank This is a great turntable to listen to your old records. Easy to assemble and the cartidge is already mounted. It would probably sound even better with a cartridge upgrade but sounds good to me. I'm using an Onkyo thx receiver and Snell cv speakers. Similar Products Used: old ar turntable |
[Aug 28, 2003]
Eric Nelson
AudioPhile
This is a pretty good turntable, but suffers from rumble problems. Do not try to use this turntable in a system with a big subwoofer. The rumble causes my Bag End Infrasub to shut off. Pretty nice sound, otherwise. Not as good as rega, but not as expensive either. Similar Products Used: Rega 3, Rega 25, Nottingham Mentor |
[May 02, 2003]
Time_Stands_Still
AudioPhile
Strength:
*Solid design that is simple. *Nice tonarm given the price of the unit *Dead quiet operation *Nice entry level cartridge for the money *Excellent dampend cuing *Heavy 4.5lb platter *Very heavy and clear dust cover *Its attractive in its simplicity *Adjustable VTA
Weakness:
*The counterweight being filled with a rubber insulator is hard to tweek in setting up tracking force. * The Manual is is light in info and missing references to things like VTA adjustment * The felt matt looks a little cheap to me, but works well enough * Solderd on cables, makes swapping to better ones more difficult After a gap of over 12 years from listening to analogue playback, I began toying with a turntable again. I bought into the digital sound in the mid 80's for its clean dynamic sound. I had run of the mill Japanese stuff back in the 80s' and it sounded fine for me. However I began reading about vinyl playback on internet forums and the itch to revive my vinyl playback got to me. I am a budget audiophile and wanted to get good bang for my buck. Music Hall quickly stood out for me. I did look at other brands in similar pricing from Project and Thorens, but I wanted to get as fair of a deal as I could. The Music Hall MMF2.1 fell into my budget and seemed like a good entry level audiophile turntable. After searching and reading for a week or so I came across the Audio Shop in Ottawa and began to deal with them on this turntable. I was satisfied with the whole deal and had them ship it too me. Upon receiving it and opening it all up I was generally pleased wih its construction. It was straight forward to assemble. The instruction pamphlet is nothing to get excited about and it fails to identify the VTA ( vertical tracking adjustment screws ) I found the tiny allen key type screws. The supplied allen key is pretty lame and I used a better one I have to make tweeking VTA adjustments, via a very falt LP and a large magnifying glass to get a good look at the ride of the stylus in the groove. I then verified the cartridge alignment and found it to be almost dead on from the factory. I just tweeked it ever so slightly. I found the gold plated ends of the cables to be nice but I wish the cables were not soldered onto the unit. It would make a cable upgrade easier later. But atleast the cables were not too cheezy. I hooked it up to my system and I knew it would take about 20 hours for the Goldring Elan cartridge to burn in, BUT! it did sound very nice out of the box. I cued up Tears for Fears, Songs from the Big Chair and was impressed by the clarity and dynamics, even from Goldring's entry level cartridge. Bass was good and the airy sound of the music details was very nice, esp. compared to a midline Japanese brand CD player I have. I A/B'd the LP with a CD version of the album and the MMF2.1 with Elan cartridge blew the cd away on my midline Denon cd player. The cd was clean and dynamic, nice for a cd, but it was 2 dimensional. The LP was as if I were in the studio with the Tears for Fears. I loved it right away. Now after the cartirdge is burned in, it sounds better. The edge in the highs are smoother and the bass is more wholesome for me. The Turntable runs DEAD QUIET. The only noises I get are the general clicks an pops on lp's. It even has these very low in level unless you play a 2nd hand lp. that was not so well cared for. I detected no motor noise in the room or filtering from it through the cartridge/ tone arm set up. I think Music Hall does a good job in isolation on this unit, and provides a decent tonearm for the money, esp. given its lower price. I have played with various platter matts from the supplied felt mat from Music Hall. My experiment of such continues. If you are looking at a great budget audiophile turntable that is straightforward and upgradable in terms of cartridges etc. the MMF2.1 is a good choice. If you demand good quality for the price you get it in this model. If you want to enjoy the superior sound of good vinyl playback but you can't spend thousands of dollars, the MMF 2.1 is a great choice. Similar Products Used: Products used in my system for this review: Denon A/V receiver Denon cd player Paradigm Bi Polar speakers |
[Jan 19, 2003]
Jeff
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very good sound after cartridge upgrade. Simple and easy to use. Good quality tonearm, platter and bearing.
Weakness:
The supplied Goldring Elan cartridge is quite poor and needs to be upgraded. Non-removable headshell so cartridge replacement is a major hassle. Hard-wired RCA plugs. This is a very nice-sounding turntable and an incredible bargain at its sub-$300 price. Simplicity is the name of the game here. If you're looking for features like auto-return or automatic 33/45 switching, then you will need to look elsewhere. I've compared it to a number of vintage 'tables from Dual and other manufacturers and I can honestly say that the MMF-2.1 blows them out of the water. It's not the last word in audiophile sound, but it's very nice and will give you a real taste of the wonders of vinyl. A few caveats are in order, though. The supplied Goldring Elan cartridge is, to put it mildly, disappointing. It is a $50 cartridge and frankly sounds like it. Even after significant burn-in time, it still sounds lousy, with a tinny, sibilant sound. A cartridge upgrade is essential, so I really think that Music Hall should sell it without a cartridge and lower the price a bit. Another thing I don't like about it is that it does not have a removable headshell, so cartridge replacement can be a real hassle. After a short time, the flimsy tonearm wires came unattached and had to be soldered back in place. I also wish it had female RCA jacks so that the interconnects can be replaced. The ones they provide aren't very good. Still, if you're looking for a nice entry-level turntable for a reasonable price, it's hard to do much better than this. Similar Products Used: Dual 506, Pioneer PL-55X, AR XB-91 |