Music Hall MMF-2.1 TurnTables
Music Hall MMF-2.1 TurnTables
[Oct 19, 2001]
David Macks
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Fairly simple to set up and operate, if you've an engineering degree. Good, entry level machine, solid, simple.
Weakness:
Cartridge could be better, setup instruction suck. Not a bad basic, start off turntable for those who want to return to the world of vinyl. Easy to run, solid performer that gives you all you need. Reminds you why you were so happy when CD's were invented, reveals all the flaws you can find in the medium. Similar Products Used: Garrad, JVC etc... |
[Feb 08, 2001]
Yagadish
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
See below
Weakness:
See below See above Similar Products Used: See below |
[Jul 05, 1998]
Michael Johnston
an Audio Enthusiast
A glowing review for a new product, the very inexpensive Music Hall MMF-2. A basic-verging-on-shoddy little 'table built in Eastern Europe, this unassuming little product has flat amazed me with its much-higher-than-expected sound quality--well into the "good" range, even disregarding its super-low price. |
[Aug 15, 1998]
Alex Hemsath
an Audiophile
I just installed this product in my current system, replacing an old Technics belt-drive (very low-fi...). System consists of NAD 314 integrated amp and NHT SuperOne speakers. |
[Nov 05, 1998]
Brent Bomersbach
an Audio Enthusiast
I recently purchased the MMF-2 from Audio Advisor as a "secondary table" to my SOTA Comet. I was immediately blown away by the sound quality. I played a somewhat worn copy of Dr. John's Gumbo and it was like hearing it for the first time all over again. The slight scratchiness I was used to hearing was GONE. I have since then upgraded to a Grado ZTE+3 and the sound was even better. I have since then been listening to many of my older and worn records that I had given up on because of the scratchiness sounding surfaces. This table is top choice for the money. The only thin the SOTA beats it on is a somewhat wider soundstage, that's it! Overall I'm extremely satisfied with this purchase. |
[Mar 11, 1999]
Mike D.
a Casual Listener
Hooked this baby up to my system last night, replacing a shitty old Yamaha turntable. Joy! Joy! Joy! Put on Harry Nilsson's "Nilsson Schmilsson," and it sounded infinitely better than the CD. The first Chuck Mangione Quartet record, which sounded weak on the Yamaha, was now brilliantly vibrant, full. The detail on Chuck's horn was chilling. It's amazing how great vinyl sounds on a decent 'table like this one. Highly recommended for anyone who wants to get into vinyl or resuscitate an old, neglected record collection. I can't wait to hit the used vinyl shops and pick up all the gems a bunch of suckers got rid of thinking CDs were better than vinyl. They're not. All you need is a good turntable like the MMF-2. I'm glad my dad never got rid of his records, 'cause now they're mine! I'm not buying any CDs for a long time. |
[Jul 17, 1999]
Bob Bielecki
an Audio Enthusiast
I concur w/ Henry's review in which he said superglue was required to secure the headshell. Every time I use the finger lift to raise the arm I twisted the headshell. Superglue works great, but be careful raising the arm from its holder. Also, forget all the hype about adjusting tonearm height, etc. Buy a midline TT from someone else if you feel the need to make that adjustment. |
[Aug 31, 1999]
Dennis Pikalow
an Audio Enthusiast
Great entry level turntable for my modest system. Makes the most of Pinnacle AC650's I recently purchased. I found the setup worked fine with the standard Goldring Elan as supplied by Audio Advisor. |
[Sep 12, 2000]
bob farnam
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
sounded fine when it worked
Weakness:
motor, head shell After about 50 hours of occasional use, motor froze up. Local authorized dealer could not obtain replacement motor from manufacturer after repeated tries. Also, head shell detached from arm (a complaint I subsequently have read is not uncommon). |
[Mar 02, 1999]
Audio Review
an Audio Enthusiast
It looks like this might be the only review for today. I think AR lost some hits with its recent format change. Well, I have been dissatisfied with this section of the site for quite some time. It has always seemed that the Halls of Fame and Shame were not accurate. I guess the webmaster decided to end this problem by simply getting rid of them. This is too bad. I had hoped that the ratings system would be improved. It is obvious that many people post repeatedly to jack up or down a rating. Also, it seems that many posters will just post without any knowledge of a product. Because more reviews are needed, I think that this would be a good forum to let the voice of the audio enthusiast be heard, especially due to the unreliability of the chat forums on this site as well as the recent censorship and presence of our Big Brother at mtbr. |