Music Hall MMF-5 TurnTables
Music Hall MMF-5 TurnTables
[Aug 10, 2003]
AudioPhile
Strength:
Excellent performance for the price
Weakness:
Inaccurate VTF markings on the counterweight Cheap supplied felt mat I purchased this turntable yesterday afternoon to replace a P-mount Technics SL-QD33 turntable that could no longer keep up with new audiophile pressings of classic jazz records. When I unpacked it, the supplied Goldring 1012GX cartridge was already installed, and properly aligned after inspecting it. After about 20 minutes of checking the connections and setting up the tracking force (I don't trust the markings on the counterweight, but rather I used a $20 Shure stylus pressure gauge to set a 1.75-gram VTF), this MMF-5 really sings great music! The detail is much improved over my old Technics with any cartridge. I had purchased that Technics back in 1989 because I fell into the trap that fully-automatic, quartz-locked direct-drive turntables with DC motors and P-mount tonearms are "superior" to fully-manual, belt-drive turntables with AC synchronous motors and standard-mount tonearms. But after further research, I've found that most high-end turntables are of that so-called "inferior" fully-manual, belt-drive, AC-motor type. Why? Because direct-drive turntables actually transmit noise and vibrations to the platter, affecting the potential sound quality. Automatic features tend to add even more noise to the sound. And asynchronous DC motors are much more expensive to manufacture than synchronous AC motors of similar quality and performance. Worst of all, P-mount tonearms tend to be really cheaply made, flimsy, record-mulching toy arms with no adjustments for VTF, VTA, azimuth or anti-skating. No wonder why my old Technics SL-QD33 distorted on loud piano notes when it was fitted with a P-mount Grado Prestige Silver cartridge, and switching to the Audio Technica AT925 only reduced that distortion. But the MMF-5 doesn't distort at all on those same loud piano notes, even with the same phono stage that's integrated into my 14-year-old entry-level consumer Pioneer SX-2600 receiver that I had used my SL-QD33 with for years. (A standard-mount DJ-style Panasonic fully-automatic DD turntable with a Grado Prestige Red cartridge also didn't distort on those loud piano notes, but obviously it didn't deliver anywhere near as much musical detail as my new MMF-5.) The MMF-5's full-manual, belt-drive operation means no more extraneous noises coming from the turntable itself intruding into the sound quality. The only noises that I hear from the MMF-5 are the pops, clicks or scratches on worn or abused vinyl. If you buy the MMF-5, there are two things that I would recommend: Buy a separate stylus gauge (the Shure stylus pressure gauge for $20 works well), and replace the felt mat with a mat made of a different material (though I tried a cheaper "upgrade" mat that was so sticky that it left marks on one of my practice pieces of vinyl). Similar Products Used: Technics SL-QD33 (junk), Technics SL-BD202 (trashed), Rotel low-end auto-return (trashed) |
[Aug 03, 2003]
rbr
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
fantastic "low noise floor".This is a very quiet TT (actually I cannot perceive any noise coming out of this TT at all. very heavy glass platter with record clamp. deeper bass(I actually have to turn down the volume in my bass setup). The goldring 1012GX medium mass MM is a high output (6.5mV)cartridge, very natural sounding. I do not think that I need to upgrade. with my old Technics TT, I needed to have the volume almost to reference level in order to gain volume. Not with this TT & cartridge combo. Now listening levels are just a few notches more than when I am listening CD's
Weakness:
The felt mat (I will replace it with something better) After a lot of research I decided that the Music Hall MMF-5 was the best turntable for the money. At $495, the features and, sound quality coming out of this turntable right out of the box is just simply amazing I do not longer have to crank-up to almost reference level the volume on my receiver(Denon's AVR-3802 to be able to listem to the music. Larry, at hollywood Sound (in Hollywood,FL) setup my turntable (at no extra cost!!), Thanks, Larry. I decideded to buy the TT locally so, that I could get all the support I might need,since I do not have any experience setting up TT, since my previous TT were semi-automatic cheap plastic Technics TT's. which are plug & play It seems that Music Hall have iron out some of the Quality Control posted here by previous reviewers (last one was in 2002. The cartridge in my TT does not ride low, Azymuth was perfect(probably ,because Larry set up the TT) |
[Oct 08, 2002]
Bombaywalla
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
The MMF5 is a superb budget TT for getting at the musical goods & is certainly No. 1 in its class. The MMF5 offers fine levels of quietness & details; a slightly bright high frequency/treble (might appeal to many out there), which is not fatiguing atleast to my ears; rich & honest midranges & a superb warm & deep bass.
Weakness:
Slightly forward trebles, bass might not be the best out there. Not the last word in details. This review/listening report is for the Music Hall MMF5 turntable. I bought this TT brand new in January 2002 at Hollywood Sound, FL. Right out of the box (as Larry promised me) the TT sounded great. The 1st thing I noticed was that the hum of the AC motor driving the spindle was gone, gone, gone! I immediately realized why people like belt-drive TTs so much. Thus, the spaces between tracks were blacker/quieter than ever before. The high frequencies were immediate but not fatiguing to my ear. This could have been a combination of a new TT, using BL1 Series II interconnects & B&W DM604S2 speakers. Anyway, what I liked about this top-end was that I was involved in the music – it said “drop whatever you are doing & listen to me”. This appeals to me because I feel that it is a live session. Playing the MMF5 thru the CAT SL1 offered me a whole new world of bass – plenty, tight, focused, fast & in full control of my speakers. Vocals came thru with much more precision & fullness than with my previous Dual – it seemed that the artist now removed a veil covering their mouth. The midrange had now transformed itself into something much more articulate, more dynamic and with the correct timbre. I felt that there was a certain “sparkle” in the sound (that I had been missing so badly in my Dual) that once again reminded me just why vinyl is so irresistible. When I changed the power amp section to the RG4 & changed the interconnects to the Groneberg, the sound quality went up a few more notches. The power output & current drive capability has doubled or tripled which has brought much greater transparency to the overall sound. In conclusion, I’m a delighted owner of the MMF5 TT. My experience with it has all been good despite the very low rider 1012GX cartridge being heart-palpitatingly close to the vinyl surface (it has not touched the vinyl even once till today). Similar Products Used: Dual CS506 Direct-drive TT Technics Full automatic, linear tracking TT from the early 1980s. |
[May 13, 2002]
RIDGELY HOYLE
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
split plinth;glass platter;i put 1 inch rubber mat underneath;totally isolated!!
Weakness:
manual;set-up was a little involved I never knew that vinyl had this much life! Even records from 30 yrs. ago played on inferior equip. ;handled at raucous gatherings sound superior.I am really just blown away!!!!!!!Excellent piece!!! Similar Products Used: old technics piece of crap |
[Apr 22, 2002]
Ben Gordon
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Looks, performance, dollar-for-dollar one of the best values out there...
Weakness:
Horrible manual - looks like Barney Rubble wrote it and Bamm-Bamm did the illustrations... Wonderful value in a moderately-priced turntable. An especially nice design, with the arm and plinth separated from the motor and main mechanism. Comes with a Goldring 1012 cart as well. Compared it with the Pro-ject and the Rega''s. Both of those wanted more for the TT and came w/o an arm or cart! Go with the Music Hall. Great sound, great looks (love the green glass platter - gets lots of comments!)and excellent price! Similar Products Used: Rega, Pro-ject - and other awful monstrosities from my past that are too horrible to name - okay - BSR, Dual, Technics. |
[Feb 23, 2002]
Ronald
AudioPhile
Strength:
Everything, enough said.
Weakness:
CD''s This is a hell of a turntable, The turntable look real good and the Music coming from this baby is awsome. CD''s dont touch records. Music Hall MMF5 is the monster.Thorns are ok but not in this league. Similar Products Used: Nad 533 Rega Planar |
[Nov 01, 2001]
John
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Value/Performance; Cartridge
Weakness:
Tonearm No doubt about it: a tremendous value for the money. Purchased at end of October, 2001. |
[Jan 13, 2001]
Damien
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
See below
Weakness:
See below Although I haven't heard many different turntables in my time, I've read around a lot about turntables and I know a damn good value when I see one. The MMF-5 is a damn good value. It's a damn good turntable is its own right as well. I broke the stylus on the supplied Goldring and have been using a Grado Black. Even so, the sound truly outclasses my digital setup. I use a good transport (NAD 502) with a very good DAC (upgraded Monarchy 18B). As it is, I don't really feel the urge to get a new stylus (you can get 'em cheap via mail order from the UK, BTW) even though the Goldring sounds way better (maybe this has something to do with the fact that installing a new cartridge is a serious pain in the ass). Similar Products Used: Harmon/Kardon T35C |
[Aug 03, 2001]
bob branson
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Platter, design, tonearm, looks
Weakness:
anti-skate, tonearm rest, chintzy photocopied manual The TT has been a pain, but more of a joy. This is a bit of a saga, so I apologize for length. Similar Products Used: technics sl1900 |
[Oct 13, 2000]
Neville
Audiophile
Strength:
Good build. Good cartridge
Weakness:
Could have better rca cables. I dont like the weight on a fishing gut idea I posted a review of my Project 1.2 a few days ago and after that decided that I wanted something a bit more better. I traded it in for the MMF-5 and immediately noticed a vast improvement in sound. It has the same tonearm as the 1.2 but the cartridge is far more superior and the build is just so different - you have 2 layers 1 of which houses the motor and the 2nd 'plinth' or layer sits ontop of the first one with rubber feet. You also get a glass platter with a screw-on-clamp. This all amounts to a better feel and sound for the t'table. I'm quite happy with the purchase but i will probably go for a much better cartridge in the next few weeks. Similar Products Used: Pro-ject 1.2 |