AudioQuest Diamond Interconnect Cables
AudioQuest Diamond Interconnect Cables
[Jan 27, 1999]
Jason
a Casual Listener
What about Audio Quest Quartz? Does anyone try it? |
[Mar 21, 1999]
Gary Okada
an Audiophile
I've enjoyed my AudioTruth Diamond x2 for about 9 months now. These are my interconnects of choice right now. In my system they outperform the Monster M2000 Sigma (another very worthy interconnect) in enough ways to be the winner. One complaint that is very noteworthy, however, is in ambient detail, which the Diamonds have a wealth of. While having great detail, there is just a touch of darkness to the overall tone of the ambient material when compared to the Sigma, which sounds more like the ambient character of, say, Bernadette Peters at The Cerritos Center For The Performing Arts. I know. This is a totally unfair comparison. I'll Be Your Baby Tonight was NOT recorded at the Cerritos Center For The Performing Arts. All in all, these interconnects are part of the whole in my reference system which changes character remarkably with less than quarter inch differences in speaker placement. 5 stars. |
[Jun 07, 1999]
John
an Audiophile
After reading the reviews below, I figured somebody here might as well note a major difference of opinion on these cables. First of all, the AQ Diamond either in the old X2 or newer X3 do not have ambient detail. This is one cable that simply robs the music of this very important aspect. The T/A Ultra does a great job here even though it has a rolled-off top end, the NBS Master is exceptional here in all aspects, the Cardas Golden Cross is also very good with harmonic richness and bloom. But the AQ Diamond? ...... Doesn't even come close! |
[Jul 03, 1999]
corrado
an Audiophile
I think the audio quest diamond is the best interconect i have ever heard it sounds beutifull enough said. |
[Jul 18, 1999]
Chris Woodson
an Audiophile
Excellent cable in all respects. Generous amounts of detail without brightness and exellent amount of realism is delivered in all types of music. Regarding the review below, I will acknowledge the Cardas Golden Cross in it's own right is a good cable. But superior? I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I feel this cable when used with the proper caliber of equipment is the standard by which all inter-connect should be judged. |
[Aug 01, 1999]
zugswang
an Audio Enthusiast
Owning a pair of Emeralds already, I was curious to see if AQ was really giving us something better for 900 + dollars, or just pulling our collective leg. So I auditioned some.Yep, they're better. Slightly less grain, more smoothness. That little bit more definition to each instrument. That slightly more compelling soundstage. The changes are very much in line with the AQ sound -- tonally and harmonically honest, open at the top end, firm at the bottom. If you can afford, they are tbe best AQ, although I don't know how they'd compare with the top offerings of other cable makers. |
[Aug 08, 2001]
Corrado Infarinato
Audiophile
Strength:
trancparecny, natrualnes, detail.
Weakness:
nothing The diamonds have a sound of there own pure and natrual nothing added nothing taken away just pure signal. Similar Products Used: n/a |
[Jul 08, 2001]
John
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Sense of timing, dynamics, bass, tonal richness, quickness, overall balance; laid back.
Weakness:
Maybe ambience, although hard to tell with my mixture of cables. I wanted to check in with a confirmation of my original opinion: I still have AQ Diamond interconnects in my system after close to 2 years and still love them. I use them in tandem with XLO Type1 (from my preamp to amp), and together these 2 cables with my passive preamp give a fully satisfying sound that is particularly noteworthy for bass punch and depth, in addition to being just the most honest or realistic sound I've heard from any interconnect. I also salute the reviews below which are very thorough and well done, since the reviewers actually take the trouble to compare the Diamonds with other cables (gee what a concept). Although I haven't heard everything, nothing I've heard in the cheap seats has this kind of class. I had a brief attachment to the Pro Silways, but aside from their excellent treble, I found them lacking ultimately in dynamics, bass, and the subjective involvement factor. Similar Products Used: AQ Emerald, Transparent Music Wave Plus, Pro Silway Mark II |
[Feb 20, 1999]
CTN
an Audio Enthusiast
Just got my AudioTruth Diamond x2 and replaced my Kimber KCAG. It's like getting a new pair of glasses where things become more focused. Since my speakers already had a clearly defined base, I didn't notice much extension, but the base became more separated. Vocals improved too with a clearer definition as well as the at the top, high end. Kimber KCAGs were good and half as expensive as the Diamond. However, to get your system that little extra push towards Audio nirvana, the Diamond will do it. If your system doesn't sound as expected, you will know that the weak link is not the Diamond interconnect. Regardless of cost, the Diamond definitely gets 5 stars. Some people will wince at the cost because you can by a medium-end CD player for it. But if your system is high-end, and you have to have one of the best, you must try the Diamond. Considering the cost, it gets 4 stars. But 5 stars for performance, easily. |
[Jun 04, 2001]
Louis
Audiophile
Strength:
Very natural and smooth.
Weakness:
Laid back.
Similar Products Used: AudioTRUTH Lapis x3, Emerald x3, Opal x3, Ruby x3, Quartz x3, Topaz x3, Turqouise x3, Jade x3. Harmonic Technology Pro-Silway Mark II. |