Acoustic Research Pro Series Interconnects Speaker Cables
Acoustic Research Pro Series Interconnects Speaker Cables
USER REVIEWS
[Jul 24, 2003]
kidmichel
AudioPhile
Strength:
Build, overall quality, many features(oxygen free, gold plated pin, dual shield), good looking, excellent in everything.
Weakness:
None that i have noticed yet. I have just bought some proseries 2 audio cables for connecting my dvd player to the amp. I immediately noticed that they gave more detail, a better image, a warmer sound, the soundstage improved, i also could turn the voulume up and it didn´t distorted like the old box cables or sony cables i used, i didn´t think they could improve my system so much. They beat easily monster cable interlink 300. Excellent cables for the price. Similar Products Used: Box cheap cables(big mistake), sony cables, monster cable interlink 300, tributaries (also good but a little more expensive. |
[Apr 02, 2002]
Mike
Audio Enthusiast
Weakness:
none that I can hear at the price payed. I purchased a pair of these a year ago to connect my cd player to my integrated amp. I had been like many others highly skeptical on the benefits of expensive interconnects. These made a substancial inprovement in the sound of my cds bringing out little things I had never heard before an adding clarity that was not there before also. These made me wonder if a more expensive pair of cables would make even more of an improvement. so I purchased a pair of Better Cables Silver Serpent cables. I my self found the Silver Serpent cables to be to reveling, bringing out back ground sounds to much and drowning out the main part of the music. So I went back to the ARs, and to my tastes find them to be better than the Silver Serpents and alot cheaper. For the price you can purchase these cables they are a great buy. Similar Products Used: Better Cables Silver Serpent cables |
[Feb 18, 2001]
busy child
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
sound, grounded at the source ,sturdy connection
Weakness:
the rubber end grips dry rot the cable is all around a very good cable. i got mine at sears in chula vista ca. i had an 18$ cupon for a purchase and saw them and needed them anyway. i have had them since 97 and my only complaint is that the little rubber end grips dry rotted away on the reciever end. cable still works exellent. they are as good as the monster 250 which is also a very good consumer cable. they look cool too. Similar Products Used: monster and radio shack gold |
[Mar 02, 2001]
Ken Keller
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
construction and component quality, tight fit, excellent shielding, grounded at source.
Weakness:
None that I've seen or heard. The entire line of AR's Pro Series patch/interconnect cables are top notch performers for all types of consumer grade (or higher) audio and/or video setups. I use a variety of lengths/types on both my Dolby 5.1 Home Theater setup and my standard two-channel stereo CD/tape/LP rack system. Even old equipment will be made to sound better using these interconnect cables. Stop shopping around right now and go to and get solid discount prices and superfast shipping on this entire line of cables. One of the best buys on the Web! Similar Products Used: Monster XP speaker cable w/AR gold connectors. |
[Apr 04, 2001]
Paul
Casual Listener
Strength:
Cost and quality.
Weakness:
None Can't compare against any other as this is the only SW cable that I ever used. No interference, it hooked right up, no problems. Also S video is a good value also. Similar Products Used: None |
[Feb 14, 2001]
Andrew Mugisha
Audiophile
Strength:
Allows most of the music (PRAT=pace rhytm and timing) to come through. Clear.
Weakness:
Adds some color in the form of warmth. These are excellent value cables as can be seen from the other reviews. The 3 ft seems less colored than the 6 foot but they are both acceptable even in a high res system. I am always impressed when I 'forget' about a component of the chain in my system. I have to say that the ARs humbly achieve this status. These cables in sound are worth a lot more. Similar Products Used: Ultralink, Van den Hul, Kimber but at higher prices. |
[Mar 21, 2001]
FRANKO
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
good construction, good price
Weakness:
wish they has a better version with teflon insulation and thicker wire. I AM A BARGAIN HUNTER I will walk a mile to save a dollar...it is the principle not the money. Similar Products Used: Kimber pbj, monster 550I, Wireworld solstice 3, Phoenix gold, 'free cables' that came with my Sony vcr. |
[Jun 07, 2001]
Paul
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Build, Now have a 'clearer' Image
Weakness:
improvement wasnt that that great over free cables or maby I just need to burn them in I just hooked these cables up and they are very well made. They sound better than the free cables that I have been using for over a year now. I still think that they need time to burn in. Over all I am very pleased with my purchase. Similar Products Used: freeby cables |
[Sep 03, 2001]
Jason
Audiophile
Strength:
Better than generic interconnects
Weakness:
Dull sounding. Hides detail. I bought a few of these cables based on reviews here. These cables can be good for some applications, but definitely not for some others. Similar Products Used: Audioquest and Nordost |
[Dec 03, 2001]
luke k
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
price, look, service
Weakness:
below i wasnt sure when people talked about how different cables can effect sound... right after i was done with connecting my new cables (interconnects, toslink, coaxial all AR) to my system i found out that everything sounded.... duller. it could be my ears. it could be me being paranoid. i am letting all my equipment run constantly to "break in" these cables for about a week or two to see whatll happen. one thing i hate is the tight grip of those cable ends on my equipment. it makes me feel like i will rip the rear panel apart every time i try to switch things around. Similar Products Used: cables that came with equipment |