AudioQuest Topaz Speaker Cables
AudioQuest Topaz Speaker Cables
[Aug 13, 1998]
Bruce Satow
an Audiophile
In my system, Parasound P/LP 2000 preamp, Musical Fidelity X-A50 monoamps, Marantz CD67SE CD player, I found that the Audioquest Topaz II interconnects delivers a more transparent midrange and treble, AND controlled bass than the Monster Interlink 400 that it replaced. I have also found that the Audioquest Turqoise (originals) worked well between my preamp and amps but is giving the Topaz II a chance there to see what will come up after some burn in time.Between the Marantz CD67SE and the preamp the Topaz II's made the most difference. Between the preamp and amps, I noticed better imaging and some loss in bass extension, but I believe after some time the bass will be back. |
[Oct 05, 1998]
Ryan T.
an Audio Enthusiast
The AQ Topaz 2 is an amazing value for its money. I usually buy at 24in lengths from my dealer, which he charges me 50$ Cdn. Compared to ordinary, cheap interconnects, the Topaz has a much wider soundstage. The bass comes through much cleaner and more definitive. Music, especially songs/pieces that have alot going on at once, sound much more "organized" and "articulate". With the cheap cable, everything is jumbled up into a mess. A word of advice to those new to cables or skeptics: Don't evaluate cables at first with an intimate solo. Start with some mainstream pop/rock. The improved soundstage and the more "articulate" sound is easier to discern. Believe. |
[Dec 07, 1998]
Joseph Fisk
an Audio Enthusiast
I replaced the el-cheapo radio shack interconnect between my preamp and amp with a 0.5 meter topaz interconnect (cost $65US). |
[Dec 06, 1998]
lyndon lim
an Audiophile
After much unbiased research and listening, I have to conclude that this cables and most other cable companies are absolutely ripping gullable consumers off. This product for its price is absolute rubbish. The only way to really test a product is to bring a comparison along then ask the sales man if he can tell the difference between one to the other. And which one is superior. I did exactly that with a much cheaper Quad interconnects, my $50.00 interconnects trashed the whole range of this brand. Don't waste your money guys !!! |
[Dec 11, 1998]
joe
a Casual Listener
This fecal-brown, thick, inflexable cable has nearly illedgible markings: audioquest Topaz x 2 hyperlitz, and if the light is strong, you may be able to see a directional arrow. The direction is significant since the drain shield is connected at the business end only--as it should be. I bought a factory meter pair for about $65 on the recomendation of Stereopile. If it came with instructions I must have missed the part about the "locking" connections. They were very hard to put on equiptment, due to the thickness of the connectors and stiffness of the cable, and working against the wall upside-down at the back of the rack is probably what you're doing too. Upon removing they have pulled out the female RCA's on a processor, cd player and two pre-amps, so far. When the outer covering shrunk back from the connectors I got fed up and stopped using them. The connectors look good, are color-keyed and the collar tip can be screwed to loosen or tighten the connection. I did not know this. It was so tight I was twisting the thing to get it on and off and the collar started to unscrew, and then things were much easier. When I took it apart this is what I found: |
[Jan 19, 1999]
Tv
an Audiophile
The Topaz is much better than Radioshack Gold Interconnects, as well as the Phoenix Gold interconnects. However, $75 for a one meter pair is excessive. Try the Kimber PBJ. Initially, I did not think this was excessive, until I auditioned the Ruby. In terms of sonic gratification, the improvement of the Ruby over the Topaz is almost as noticable as the improvement of the Topaz to the Radioshack Gold. |
[Jan 28, 1999]
H Morris
an Audio Enthusiast
This cable was a bit an enigma at first. When I switched from my IXOS Gamma 1002my first reaction was wow! it is so much cleaner so much detail. However after time I found myself not enjoying the listening experience though every single detail appeared to be present. It eventually became apparent that on complex passages the various instruments, vocalist etc apppaered to be competing against each other, there was no depth to the soundstage. Having purchased these cables on their ranking in Stereophile, I kept doubting myself and thinking the problem was elsewhere until I found Hi Fi Choice, the UK magazine, in their review found it flattened the music. |
[Mar 31, 1999]
JeffN
an Audio Enthusiast
Can't be beat for the price. |
[Nov 27, 1999]
Karl
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Good clarity I never thought there was much to the hype about interconnects. I figured if theere was that much difference, there would be a reccomendation by the componenet manufacturer or they would be included in the unit when purchased. |
[Nov 27, 1999]
tyson
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
solid performing copper wire, relatively low price, high grade copper
Weakness:
it is still just copper anyone considering buying this cable needs to check out the pure silver sound trio interconnect. for only $80 you get a pure silver interconnect that will trounce just about any copper interconnect on the market, no matter how expensive it is. they are at www.puresilversound.com I got the pure silver sound quartets about 3 weeks ago and they just kill my audiotruth emeralds. happy listening. Similar Products Used: audiotruth emeralt, pure silver sound quartet |