MIT Cables Terminator 2 Speaker Cables
MIT Cables Terminator 2 Speaker Cables
[May 03, 1999]
Rob
an Audiophile
I found a good deal on the interconnects: 2 1 meter pairs for 150.00. I couldn't resist, and I must say I'm sort of sorry I didn't. |
[Jul 16, 1999]
Ted
an Audio Enthusiast
I bought a pair of the T2 speaker cables on sale through Audio Advisor based on the recommendation of a friend (and listening to his systems). Though I was comparing them to admittedly weak cables (high quality, oxygen-free bare wire...Liberty, I think), I found a decent improvement right out of the box from what we affectionately call "the garden hoses". The sound actually deteriorated pretty dramatically for a couple days, then got better and better until it peaked after 2+ weeks of constant break-in (my cat hates that). |
[Jul 16, 1999]
Larry Stolow
an Audio Enthusiast
MIT Terminator 2 Bi Wire:I wished to upgrade my speaker cables.For about 2-3 years I have used had a pair of the least expensive transparent cable. Which were OK, but I thought that this was the weak link in my system- it was! Originally I brought home a pair of Terminator 4's but they did not perform to my liking. The dealer suggested trying the Terminator 2- bi wire.I am extremely pleased. |
[Oct 23, 1999]
Chris
Audiophile
First of all, this is the top of the "consumer" line of MIT cables. I don't own this product, but I bought a pair on a 30 day trial period from a local store to try out of curiousity. After I burned them in for most of the 30 days, I sat down and gave them a serious listen. I was not impressed with this product at all. I'd say that the only thing that it has going for it is its bass warmth, though it isn't correct IMO. Overall, this product to me sounds sonically like any other MIT or Monster product out there. Rolled off at the extremes with an overly plump mid bass. I'd say that these cables are highly colored and if you want a nice tone control for your inexpensive gear, their is no need to look any further. I'm not going to give this product the lowest rating because there is worse out there. For my money though, I'd be much happier with something else. |
[Nov 15, 1999]
s k
Casual Listener
Found that the T2 speaker cables were a great improvement from run of the mill speaker cables. Burn is seems to be very important and listening gets better over time. |
[Jul 10, 2001]
James
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
warm sounding, controlled treble, bass, soundstage
Weakness:
bass come become a bit too much. slight coloration on the mids This is not a real bad cable if you have a very bright system. Yes, it adds weight to music, but sound is a bit artificial. During my test period, I was using an XRCD audiophile reference IV and the bass seems to be BLOATED at times. Soundstage though was good. At this price range, there are other cables that are good out there. Also, against the transparent cable (also with the box), transparent is better. Similar Products Used: kimber 1020, van den hul d102, transparent music link super, ixos, tara labs prism 22, 33i |
[Jul 10, 2001]
Jim P
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Bass impact, soundstaging, build,locking rca's
Weakness:
none for $$ My review is for the 1 meter interconnects. Similar Products Used: various Ultralink,Monster and now MIT cables |
[Sep 09, 2000]
Dan
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
INCREDIBLE BASS IMPROVEMENT @ INCREASED THE VOLUME OF AMP??
Weakness:
None at this price except bulky WOW! WHAT A DIFFERENCE A CABLE CAN MAKE! WHO WHOULDDA THUNK IT?????????? I bought these from AA after ordering a Set of MIT 330 Interconnects from Usedcable.com. AA charged 120 for the 8ft. pair and 140 for the 12 ft. pair plus $9 shipping and $10 for 4 banana clips. I found out later that usedcable will match the price plus the shipping is free so I ordered my center channel from them. AA would not sell me just one cable so my business goes to Usedcable from now on Similar Products Used: Monster Cable & 12 guage RS |
[May 16, 2000]
Jason
Audiophile
Strength:
Looks; superb bass definition and weight; revealing of the source (this can also be a drawback on poor recordings); smooth and robust mids; warm, airy sound; non fatiguing top end; ICONN connectors provide a lot of flexibility
Weakness:
None that I've found other than mine took a good 2 weeks to burn in and continued to sound better after 3 weeks of constant burn in (I highly recommend using a break-in disc as I did) I'd like to start by saying that anyone who says cables don't make a difference in a good system is missing the boat (and the best sound their equipment can serve up). Cables are VERY important, especially if you don't have run-of-the-mill equipment. I also bought a pair of MIT T-2 interconnects that I will also place a review on. In short, using both made a remarkable difference in a system I was already very happy with. Similar Products Used: These replace Tara Labs Space and Time cables. Have also used Monster Cable (don't remember model) |
[Jun 23, 1997]
Charles Purvis Kelly, Jr.
a Casual Listener
I demoed these cables last week when I was audtioning a preamp (soon to be the McCormack TLC-1 (Standard)), and needless to say, I was impressed with their sound. Extended highs, a neutral and clear midrange, and tightly extended lows (Did I use these two adjectives in the same sentence?), These could be the cables that could tighten up the lows that I'll be getting from the Vandersteen 2Ce's. They almost do not have a sonic footprint of their own (they do slightly sweeten the top-end, but so what). Nice soundstage with great depth too. And the speaker cables are unusually thick with a nicely designed network box. |