Monster Cable 2.2 Speaker Cables
Monster Cable 2.2 Speaker Cables
USER REVIEWS
[Apr 08, 2012]
Marty
Audio Enthusiast
I'll start off by saying, these are my first "real" set of speaker cables. and this will be the first review I've ever written about any of my own audio equipment, but after hearing the difference these made... I had to encourage others who are thinking about getting these cables, to just spend the money and get them...
|
[Mar 02, 2000]
Henrik Gabriel
Audiophile
Strength:
very neutral, Deep soundstage, timbre and fascinating voice reproduction
Weakness:
May be difficult to connect! Dynamic. INTRODUCTION Similar Products Used: Fadel Art, Straight Wire, MIT, Kimber, Groneberg other Monster Cable |
[Mar 18, 2000]
MP
Audiophile
If you talk to people in the technical side of the audio industry and ask them about the role of speaker cables, most will tell you that every cable, to varying degrees, will pass distortion through the wire. It is this distortion that influences the quality of the signal and its ability to create depth, soundstage and musical reproduction in the loudspeakers. Less distortion through the cables means better sound. Makes sense. |
[Dec 06, 2001]
STEVE
Audiophile
Strength:
Build Qulity, ability to reproduce music!
Weakness:
None in terms of performance. As with all good cables, price is certainly ans issue. People who are interested in upgrading their cables and really want a top notch product must demo this cable. Compared to the other manufacturer's this is a bargin. the clarity of the tight bass and the impact of the midrange is truely amazzzing. Plus, it has the monster interchangeable connections that allow you to install bannana plugs or spades. It's roughly 3/4 of an inch thick and as stated before it is well crafted. 25ft run. Similar Products Used: Mit, AQ, Nordost |
[Aug 07, 1999]
Dave Borda
an Audiophile
I recently auditioned Monster cables M2.2s speaker cable in my $40,000 reference system; consisting of Dunlavy SC-V reference monitors, Audio Research VT-200 amplifier and LS-25 preamp with a Balanced Audio Technologies VK-D5 front end.This product is "World Class"! I have owned and lived with $12,000 worth of various cable companies product from the likes of Transparent and MIT to name two. The Monster Cable M2.2s speaker cables outclassed them all: the refined and detailed high end(liquid and sweet with no grain), the palpably rich and tonaly accurate midrange and the deep unrestrained articulate bass was astonishing. Enthralling is the only word I could think of as I kept reaching for the next CD to play! If any audiophile desires an absolutely beguiling set of reference cables that capture the heart, soul and spirit of a "Live" concert..search no more...these cables deliver! They just don't have the snob appeal. |
[Oct 11, 1998]
Veda
an Audio Enthusiast
I actually thought these wires are well made, for a Monster that is. As for the sound, it has deep bass and decent midrange but lacks crisp treble. That's fine for movies but in a real music system? I don't think so. As for famous people using this brand, check out the new Monster-Krell alliance... Krell just lost 1 point of respect. Still, they managed to put out great sound through the JM Lab Utopias in the HTExpo... |
[Sep 19, 1998]
Iuri Kranert
an Audio Enthusiast
One year ago I wa a monster fan. I didnt know any better. Brainwashed by Monster ads and the fact that they are so easy to find. I have a story to tell. Hope I can chnge you. Please, read on. On it aug97 isue, Home Theater Tecnology mag ran a interconnector face off. Monster 550i was the winner. However, acording to the editor of the mag, Brent Butterwrth, Straightwire Chorus II was BETTER. I bougt both brands and conducted a face off myself. THAT changed my sistem AND my life. Chorus II had a deeper bass, more detail and made voices sound awsome! Monster 550i was just ok. Now, check this out: Chorus II had a more controlled bass and better human voice reproduction than my Monter 1000i, wich costs 3 times more than the Chorus II! I heard things using the Chorus II that I never heard before. Ok, the Monsters are smoother, but the Straightwire int. was neutral, almost smooth(but NEVER bright) Sooner I had every Monster cable off my sistem. Even Their video cable(wich is ISF recommended. I dont know why) paled in comparison with Straightwire video silver II. |
[Feb 18, 2001]
Russell Ruggiero
Audiophile
Strength:
Bass and Midrange.
Weakness:
None
Similar Products Used: 8TC Biwire, MIT MH 650 |
[Aug 25, 2001]
Russell Ruggiero
Audiophile
Strength:
Bass, midrange, and top-end.
Weakness:
Look's like gray garden hose in my living room.
Similar Products Used: Audio Quest, and Kimber Cable |
[Aug 30, 2000]
Perry
Casual Listener
Strength:
Good stuff, really lets you hear more bass.
Weakness:
none If you're gonna invest in a good stereo, might as well go all the way and get you some moster cable. For a small price, you can hear the full potential of what you have. |