Monster Cable MCX-1S Speaker Cables
Monster Cable MCX-1S Speaker Cables
USER REVIEWS
[May 01, 2002]
Jim
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
good high end home theater cable, very open and natural sound
Weakness:
sound quality for music not up to par for home theater, these are an excellent value. the best cables hands down for the money. not so good for music though. Slightly bloated upper bass/ lower midrange and highs a bit "scratchy". it''s not too noticeable in a home theater setup though. I give it a 5 for home theater, 2 for stereo Similar Products Used: cardas, monster cable |
[Jul 07, 2000]
Aundrae
Casual Listener
Strength:
Better Bass, Midrange and Treble
Weakness:
None, if compared with what I was using before (Radio Shack 16 guage) A friend told me to upgrade my speaker wire from the generic brand and go to Monster Cable and I would be suprised what it would do for the sound. I did not believe him, but I got some extra cash and invested in these cables from J & R Music World for $50. When I first tried them, I was very disappointed because I could not hear any tremendous difference. I kept them anyway, after three weeks or more I decided to switch back to my old generic brand, and was I shocked, the sound totally diminished, so I switched back to the Monsters' and it opened up again. I called my friend, told him about my discovery and he told me that everything in the audio world usually needs a "burn-in" time. How true this is, I do not know, but I have to say I will not be going back to the generic brand of speaker wire. I gave this Cable 4 Stars for value because I still think $50 bucks is a lot for a pair of 10' speaker cable, even though it came with banana plugs. Five stars for overall rating because of great sound. Similar Products Used: Radio Shack Brand, Bose speaker wire. |
[Sep 01, 2001]
Howard Halligan
Audiophile
Strength:
Neat package; termination options
Weakness:
expensive I have never been a great believer in expensive speaker cable. The components themselves plus speaker placement and room acoustical treatment are far more important. The mark-up on wire provides a store’s biggest profit margin thus generous sales incentives. There may be some difference in cables with one providing a different equalization effect vs. another due to different resistance, capacitance, and induction values but there might be better and cheaper ways to adjust for needed equalization. Better shielding against outside electrical radiation and interference is something that may make a difference with early stage (weak signal) interconnects. Certainly, study construction is a desirable feature but this can be found in low priced RS Gold, AR and Iced Purple cables. On the other hand bi-wiring seems to have some value. I like these cables because they sound better, but I think that’s because they replaced regular wire with bi-wire. Actually, the internal wire is of a smaller gauge then I had been using, hardly anywhere near the thick gauge that gave Monster its name and start. Yet it is adequate for the 15-foot run I’m using. Why I really love these cables is that they form neat looking package and have neat but expensive ($22.50 for 4) screw on terminations. Since my custom built ALK crossovers for my Klipschorns are bi-wirable but have small screw on barrier strips, loose strands can easily cause shorts. The braided flexible strip terminators offered are ideal for sliding under my crossovers small screws. And the Banana tips at the amp end make connection/ disconnection easy as do the fact that the bi-wires are joined internally in the cable harness. Work well for me. Similar Products Used: Radio Shack Gold |
[Jan 16, 2001]
Chris
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Resonable priced, great quality
Weakness:
Lone burnin time I purchased this cable to go with my Infinity IL40 speaker just recently purchased as well. At first I heard no difference bettween the MCX 1s and the PL3's and if anything the cable sound worse to tight and flat in depth and sound feild. This was remidedy with 6 days 24/7 burnin time along with burnering in my new speakers. I left Santana Similar Products Used: Monstor Cable Powerline 3 |
[Jan 19, 2002]
Bill
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Well-made; better sound than zip chord.
Weakness:
Not good for high-current systems. This cable is a decently made relatively inexpensive cable. I had purchased these to replace Monster XP, and they did make the sound noticably tighter and cleaner when installed. However, in my system I thought the sound was still a little flat. There just weren't the dynamics that the Dynaudios are capable of. In my system, once I replaced these with the Monster Z-2R, the difference was amazing. The MCX-1s may be a decent cable, but if you have low-impedance speakers and a high-current amp, I recommend getting a heavier-gauge cable like the Z-Series, or Kimber. Similar Products Used: Monster Z-2R |
[Jan 19, 2002]
Bill
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Well-made; better sound than zip chord.
Weakness:
Not good for high-current systems. This cable is a decently made relatively inexpensive cable. I had purchased these to replace Monster XP, and they did make the sound noticably tighter and cleaner when installed. However, in my system I thought the sound was still a little flat. There just weren't the dynamics that the Dynaudios are capable of. In my system, once I replaced these with the Monster Z-2R, the difference was amazing. The MCX-1s may be a decent cable, but if you have low-impedance speakers and a high-current amp, I recommend getting a heavier-gauge cable like the Z-Series, or Kimber. Similar Products Used: Monster Z-2R |
[Jun 25, 2001]
Jordan
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
high quality connectors, fair-to-good mids and treble
Weakness:
muddy-sounding bass, only 16-gauge, cheap soldering, poor value when compared to Monster Z1 When the last component of my new mid-fi stereo arrived, I went to Tweeter and purchased this pair of 10-foot cables. After 200 hours of continuous play, I began to listen critically to the sound passing through these cables, and I was disappointed to say the least. After spending more than I can afford on a stereo, I expected my system to sing, but instead it screeched. Bass sounded especially muddy and unclear, and overall the sound was harsh and fatiguing, especially at high volumes. I thought the speaker wire was the culprit, as my other components are very highly rated mid-fi gear (Yamaha CDC-775 CD changer, H/K 3370 receiver, Boston Acoustics Lynnfield VR-20 speakers). Similar Products Used: Monster Cable Z1 affordable audiophile cable, Monster XP cable |
[Dec 23, 1999]
Scott
Audio Enthusiast
Weakness:
Overemphasized highs, lose of midrange, non-controlled bass This review is on the MCX-IS Biwire version of this product. Would not recommend this product if your system is bright. On my system the highs were to bright and overemphasized, midrange was lost and bass was improved but not controlled. Could not live with this product, returned to dealer. |
[Aug 03, 2001]
Martin
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Imaging not bad; midrange OK
Weakness:
Treble too bright, bass digital rather than warm Gear: Similar Products Used: Kimber 4PR, 4VS, & 4TC |
[Dec 07, 1999]
Peter
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
low bass, smooth highs
Weakness:
none I was previosly using regular two core cable and was not satisfied witht he preformance so i decided to bi wire my b&w 601 s2's Similar Products Used: Audioquest type 4 |