Radio Shack RS Gold Interconnects Speaker Cables
Radio Shack RS Gold Interconnects Speaker Cables
[Dec 07, 1998]
Justin Doring
an Audiophile
I'm a big believer of cables...if the system calls for it. 5%-15% is not unreasonable in a high end system. My review of the Nordost Red Dawns is evidence of that. |
[Dec 09, 1998]
Bill Canilang
an Audio Enthusiast
I have been using RS Gold Interconnects for Audio and Video for the last few months and these are my humble opinions. |
[Mar 31, 1999]
joe
an Audio Enthusiast
i had a hard time choosing between a brand name or radio shack. overall, it did not matter. i bought these babies, anyway. they do not disappoint. color saturation and detail seems fine. as far as sound, who really knows. i guess if joe kane educated me to the best of his abilities i might be a little more critical. however, i am a firm believer in line conditioners and any other signal enhancing tools. so, i have been satisfied. i know i saved plenty of money. this owner highly recommends these cables if you are not into buying a product (such as cables) because an advertisement claims they are (probably) better. in any case, open these cables up. trust me: they are built quite well. |
[Nov 02, 1999]
deltachiguy
Audiophile
Strength:
great cable for the money. nicely built. very good sound and open soundstage.
Weakness:
radio shack label Great cable for the money. I didn't get them fopr the on slae price. I paid 25 dollars a piece for them a few years ago. I don't believe in spending mase amount of money for cables, so these hit the mark for me. Similar Products Used: audio quest topaz |
[Nov 01, 1999]
Gil Mathews
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Good solid cables that do the job
Weakness:
ugly Radio shack gold cables are the best cables for the money out there. I have used Monster and Tributaries and can tell no difference.If you want to spend a lot of money for the other high end cables, you would be better off spending it on speakers where it really makes a difference. |
[Nov 01, 1999]
James
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Shielded, cheap
Weakness:
no 1.5 foot length, connectors kind of flimsy I bought one of these to connect my CD player to a sampler I just bought and was blown away [I was using cheapo stuff before] by how much cleaner they sounded. If you're like me and are using every jack on the back of your reciever, upgrading to really good cable would cost me an arm and a leg. |
[Nov 14, 1999]
Byron Burgess
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Price, Build Quality These a good cables for the money. For most moderately priced systems these cables are more than adequate. I replace some Audioquest cabling with these with no noticable sound differences. Similar Products Used: Audioquest Turquoise |
[Feb 15, 1999]
manny
an Audio Enthusiast
OK if you have a Best Buy, Circuit City, Fry's etc... CD player and reciever and some Bose speaker or a "rack system". Otherwise, buy some real cables, there are plenty out there less than $75-$100. |
[Apr 25, 2001]
Vincent Chen
Audiophile
Strength:
Cheap for what you get. Way better than that Stock Terrible cable that comes in the box with you gear
Weakness:
Yes, grips that ground like no tomorrow, but allot better and easier than those "Turbo" Connections that Monster loves to use. First of all lets not carried away here. If you think this cable is a giant killer, keep looking and listening. Now for those great projects or systems that need some decent interconnects, these will do fine. Plus, you have a Radio Shack close to home,right?? There you go. I use my Gold Connects on all my Multimedia projects with no hassles, and the sound is still pretty darn respectable all told for the $$$. Even works fine as a Composite Video cable in a pinch, but I probably advise against long term for critical viewing. My project studio mixer has a long 20' plus cable going to my pre amp of my other main system, and no hum, or other unhappy artifacts rear thier ugly head. Just Sound, and nothing more. The Black rubber/PVC(??) sheath is plenty tough with the spring loaded ferrules to boot. Color coded rings make channel identification easier though not as clear as a "RED" and "WHITE" colored ferrule, but it looks so trick with the knurling on the barrels. I could tell my buddies that this cable is by someone else of a bigger name and he would buy that if he had not checked the cable up close. Sound?? Yeah it is not perfect, but what do want for $20.00 bucks. The midrange is congested, the highs actually not too bad, and Bass that is just a bit thin, but hey I could say the same for those cheapy Monsters and others out there too. So for the cheap seats price, the RS cables are just fine for the job. They never let me down, or damage my gear like the Monsters can with those Turbo connectors. So sound that is better than you have a right to ask, and decent build and the "almost" free price, and you have a great reliable buy. Just find you nearest Radio Shack, and you are set for those great projects including these cables. Enjoy. V.C. Similar Products Used: Monster,Audioquest,Pro Co,Audio Technica,Tara Labs and of course Radio Shack cables of one variety or another including these. |
[Feb 25, 2001]
Poorboy
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Decent quality cable,I guess...Slightly different sound than Radio Shack standard interconnects?!
Weakness:
Possibly,a slightly "thin" sound,but airy. I am not a cable-connoissuer,by any stretch of the imagination,but I can hear things-very strange,very phantasmagoric things,sometimes.But..,back to the subject of audio-interconnects!I have only ventured but cautiously into the jungle of wiredom,and,I do not think I ever will go on much of a safari.But I can say that while much of what Exotic wires seem to offer,based on my own hearsay-hunting,review-reading,etc..,has to do maybe less with actual "improvements" than with individual tastes.For instance,I prefer my Rockford-Fosgate-thick-blue-triple-shielded-interconnects to the Radio Shack Golds because the R.S.Golds,while "airy and clean" sounding,sound a little bit "tizzy" to me,"thinner",and not as "fat and rich" as the Rockford's,while giving less detail.Maybe the Rockford's are geared toward auto-sound,where all so many people care about is fat bass? All I know is,some may prefer one type of distortion,some will crave another type.All electronically reproduced sound is one flavor or another of distortion,so I know that $100 is the most that I will ever "distort" my wallet for a one meter pair of Interconnects,and I will ask to audition a given set or two before buying.Let the audio-dealer earn his keep,and beware of "snake-oil"..? Similar Products Used: Radio Shack standards,Rockford-Fosgate triple shielded. |