XLO er-11 Speaker Cables
XLO er-11 Speaker Cables
USER REVIEWS
[Apr 29, 2003]
westcoast54
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
What a great speaker cable! Competent sound, dynamic and transparent, without the "sticker shock" that comes with so many brands. If you survey the reviews and opinions, you will find that XLO is fine product and a great value. This cable is no exception!
Weakness:
If I keep on finding great deals on XLO cable, I'm going to have to put together a third system!! I've just added my second set of ER-11's, at a GREAT price thanks to Omer at Oz Enterprises. These are a 10' set with bananas, which I will be running with a Rotel RA-02 integrated and Soliloquy SAT-5's. I've used a 12' set with spades for several years with my Outlaw Audio home theater set-up. |
[Mar 07, 2003]
Art S
AudioPhile
Without a doubt, this (and XLO's Pro 600 & 1200) is the best "cheap" speaker cable on the market. Similar Products Used: Audio Research LitzLink; Harmonic Tech. Pro-9 Plus; Nordost SPM Reference; many others. |
[Nov 19, 1999]
Nick
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
neutrality, airy, detailed, good in all frequencies
Weakness:
maybe not as dynamic as more expensive cables I recently bought the Denon D-M10 mini system which comes with the mission 731i speakers. I'm very pleased with the sound of the system, but I wanted to see the effect of better speaker cables and interconnects compared to the factory ones. So I bought the Monster cable 400MkII interconnects for CD to Amp, and a 10' pair of 12 gauge Original Monster speaker cables. To my surprise, the sound wasn't as good as the one from the factory interconnects and speaker cables! There was loss of detail and it simply didn't sound as natural, there was something missing. (I should mention that I tried a variety of music from classical to rock to rap.) I then removed the Monster interconnect and put back the factory ones. The sound regained it's detail and dynamics and was quite pleasant, but after a while something bothered me. I noticed that the bass was quite pronounced and that when I played music a bit louder, the bass was muddy and overpowering. The Monster cable was better in imaging than the factory zip-cord, with nice highs but the overly strong and muddy low frequencies were not to my liking so I returned both Monster products. I decided that the factory interconnects were a good choice, but that I should find a better speaker cable. From the reviews on the web and on this site about XLO cables, I decided to give them a try. I wanted to try the er-14 ones but the dealer had the er-11 in stock and offered a 10' pair with factory pin terminations for 85$. I love these cables. They give detailed and airy highs without being bright, and good bass and midrange with detail and none of the muddiness of the Monster cable. Overall a very nice neutral/detailed sound which doesn't lack in any frequency range. I'm very pleased with my purchase. |
[Feb 05, 1999]
jeff
an Audio Enthusiast
I was very skeptical about the performance of this product. I read a review in hometheater magazine and it outscored the rest with a 91. I gave it a shot. |
[Aug 24, 1999]
Jon Elliott
an Audiophile
I used two sets per speaker to bi-wire my B&W 804's and HTM2. Transparent, huge soundstage and zero colorization. The craftsmanship is outstanding. These deserve a listen if you are looking at Kimber or Audioquest products. |
[Mar 26, 1999]
da
gayy |
[Jul 14, 2000]
Michael Dryden
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent Performance; neutral product Coloring (the Wife Factor); Excellent Customer Service
Weakness:
Difficulty in getting The Cable Company to sell it too me (evidently, they make more commission on other cables. I recently upgraded all of my electronics and speaker: moving from a Yamaha Receiver and Mirage OM-6 speakers, with Monster Cable connections and cables, to a B&K AVR 202, dual 4420M monoblocks (for the B&W N802s) and B&W HTM1 center channel and ASW4000 sub. The XLO's were the last component to arrive, so the existing Monster Cable fed the B&Ws. Similar Products Used: Monster Cable, but this is not really a 'similar' product. |