Cambridge Audio Azur 640C CD Players
Cambridge Audio Azur 640C CD Players
[Jun 13, 2008]
Carl109
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Solid build quality of unit and remote; expansive soundstage; very good detail and nice vocal rendition.
Weakness:
Hit and miss reliability or quality control; a unit that simply wont recognise discs should not end up in a store.
Note: Bought new June 2008, but drop-down menu only goes to 2006.
|
[Mar 04, 2008]
Svenster
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Price, reliability, overall smooth sound regardless of source musical stylings.
Weakness:
NONE at this price point. Really... for under $600...
Customer Service Never had an issue, works every time I power it up... Similar Products Used: Denon, Sony |
[Jan 22, 2008]
mtcane274
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Natural Tone, Great remote control, Midrange.
Weakness:
Bass focus, treble, soundstaging. The Azur 640C V.2 is a pretty good player for the price. Build quality (at least from feel and weight) is good. The player's remote is great for the price and operationally the player is good.
|
[Nov 11, 2007]
timjeter
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very refined and smooth sound
Weakness:
Long burn-in I need to preface this review by saying I have the 640C v.2. It is the second generation of the product described in the previous reviews. Secondly the dropscreen prompting a model year did not give 2007 as an option. So I indicated 2006 which is incorrect.
|
[Oct 30, 2007]
Jim Drummond
AudioPhile
Strength:
Looks, remote control, connections.
Weakness:
Build quality Arrived defective out of the box. Both the salespeople and friends in the business have told me that the ribbon connectors are flimsy and often break in transit.
Customer Service Good from Audio Advisor. Took the unit back without hassle but I had to pay over $16.00 in return shipping charges. Similar Products Used: Samsung CD/DVD player, Hitachi (Denon) CD changer |
[Sep 22, 2007]
Simon Heath
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent sound - but reliablility makes it useless - AVOID!
Weakness:
Very unreliable - left channel stopped working on two models in less than a month!
I brought my 640c V2 less than a month ago & as soon as I got it connected, I was hooked on the clarity & depth it brought to so many CDs - I felt like I was rediscovering my music collection. However, after one week the left channel stopped working. I took it back to Richer Sounds who expressed their suprise. Two weeks later and the replacement has developed the same fault. Astounded, either by the extent of my bad luck or the poor reliability of the player I wanted to find out which of these it was - many of these reviews have mentioned the same fault! I then thought maybe this was a bad batch, but the reviews on this site are two years old - how can a company with such a reputation for excellent products turn out such unreliable rubbish? Mine will be going for good tomorrow - trouble is I don't know what to replace it with... Customer Service Richer Sounds helpful, although I'm now doubtful that CA are as good as they claim. Similar Products Used: None |
[May 26, 2007]
ankurjain.aj625
AudioPhile
Strength:
build,detailed,lifelike and real presentation without any artificial sweetness created by rolling off highs(remember old alfa series of arcam cdp)
Weakness:
initially it may pu spoil the mood by being very very brash, non coherent and upfront. see the out come after at least 70 to 80 houres of burning in , not continious though. sometimes open close/ button response is slow. transport intially noisy. dont go for amp on bright side.( i am using it with marantz pm7001) very detailed,may shame some sacd players in details and dynmics. it may sound thin and flat to some but that is what should be the freqency response of a cdp. very much a 3d sounstage with very clear noiselessness. brings the details which were previously faint. try diana krall love sceans cd , you will realize the abilty of this player to make every thing lifelike. at this price nothing can match. Customer Service good Similar Products Used: onkyo liverpool |
[May 22, 2007]
ankur
AudioPhile
Strength:
very much detailed and clear sound, very good build
Weakness:
initially sound so much brash. takes at least 70 t0 80 hours for burning in. cd mechanism noisy intially.not for scrached cds.tray open button responds poorly. very detailed.very good sound staging.tried diana krall love sceans album, felt like diana singing in the room itself. plenty of air,seperation. good for every kind of music.detail and clarity wise it beats some sacd players also. Customer Service good Similar Products Used: onkyo liverpool |
[Feb 28, 2007]
Steve62
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great sound at an entry level high price
Weakness:
The highs lack that last bit of "air" but still very good, especially at this price. As I readsome of the reviews for this player by the so called professional reviewers, I read comments like shallow soundstage, with somewhat harsh highs, and tonally thin. I guess that’s why reviews are subjective because I don’t get that with this player, my NAD C272 integrated amp, and my Definitive Technology BP7006 speakers. The soundstage is huge, extending at least three feet beyond the speakers with very good depth. In my system in my room, the soundstage almost envelops you with the right source material. Image placement is also excellent with a palpable “you are there” presence. The player is very detailed, reproducing all of those little things in recordings that you don’t hear with the average budget player. The base is tight and extended, with neutral mids. I would never describe the highs as light and airy but this could also be the NAD and BP7006 speakers as neither is the last word in producing high end air. I would say that the highs are detailed without any digital harshness. Maybe just a tad bit thin-especially when the music gets complex - but only in absolute terms and when compared to players costing much, much more. Substituting interconnects and system matching may also help. It is still way better than the average budget or most other entry level high end players that I’ve heard. Ultimately the Cambridge Audio 640C II offers more than a glimpse of high end sound at an entry level price. |
[Feb 27, 2007]
Steve
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent imaging with a wide and deep soundstage
Weakness:
Highs lacking a bit in high end air but generally well done. As I read the reviews for this player by the so called professional reviewers, I read comments like shallow soundstage, with somewhat harsh highs, and tonally thin. I guess that’s why reviews are subjective because I don’t get that with this player and my NAD C272 integrated amp and my Definitive Technology BP7006 speakers. The soundstage is outstanding, extending at least three feet beyond the speakers. Depth too is very good, with very good (not excellent) layering. Image placement is excellent with a palpable “you are there” presence. The player is very detailed, reproducing all of those little things in recordings that you don’t hear with the average budget player. Tonally, the base is tight and extended, with neutral mids. I would never describe the highs as light and airy but this could also be the NAD and BP7006 speakers as neither is the last word in producing high end air. I would say that the highs are detailed without any digital harshness. Maybe just a tad bit thin-especially when the music gets complex - but only in absolute terms and when compared to players costing much, much more. It is still way better than the average budget or even entry level high end player. Substituting interconnects and system matching may also help. Ultimately this player offers more than a glimpse of high end digital sound at an entry level high end price. Similar Products Used: Replaced a highly modified Marantz CD-67 SE |