Cambridge Audio Azur 740C CD Players
Cambridge Audio Azur 740C CD Players
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 22, 2023]
rangeroo22
Strength:
Never enjoyed upsampling until the 740c. Closest digital playback to analog that I've heard. Superb upper mids, female vocals, and piano. Low bass best I've heard except very expensive Solid State amps... Weakness:
Can be a bit thin at times, but easily altered with synergistic cables. Price Paid: 999
Purchased: New
Model Year: 2010
|
[Feb 16, 2022]
Andrea1
Strength:
The infamous high-end CD player - what's so fascinating about it? Well, there are quite a number of points that actually... Here are some examples: The Cambridge Audio 740C is the only non-modded CD player in the world that can beat the famous (and extremely expensive) Linn CD-12 in measurements. It has even beaten some of the best-modified players out there, like Krells and Mark Levinsons. P.S. please check this Goodyear fencing company Weakness:
No issues encountered yet. |
[Jul 29, 2021]
Breana
Strength:
You have a nice product! | best mattress protectors Weakness:
None so far |
[Apr 13, 2021]
Ray Heng
Strength:
Is a great overall player you won't regret! Weakness:
Display too small Purchased: Used
|
[Sep 28, 2010]
Drazzz
AudioPhile
Although it surely doesn't matter to anyone who wihses to buy this device, I just coludn't resist not to mention the next: from all new CDP's I've bought trough last 15 years, taken off directly from the box, this one, undoubtedly, sounded the worst – compressed, flat, sharp. An old cat on her dying day probably sounds better.
|
[Sep 29, 2008]
timjeter
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
A solution for what ails most digital playback systems.
Weakness:
Very long burn-in This is a very neutral if not warm sounding CD player that plays most anything well. Using transparent cables will reveal the best of this player. A burn-in of 150 hours is needed to hear its true colors. I would differ with other reviewers who describe the sound as thin or sharp. It wizely does not have mid-range bloom which would make the sound mushy. I think the Cambridge people are on to something with their upsampling technology. The sound is rather analog in nature and once and for all does away with considerations of using vinyl.
Similar Products Used: NAD, cheaper Cambridge stuff, etc. |
[Jul 21, 2008]
philltubes
AudioPhile
Strength:
Very clear, fast, great detail. Make sure you give it the proper break in period.
Weakness:
May be too detailed for some tastes and systems. Long break in period that will have some giving up before they hear the full potential of the 740c. This is not so much a review but early impressions of the 740c. I have only had this player for a bout 2 weeks but have about 120-130 hours of burn in time. During the burn-in process the 740c sure has changed a lot, early on it sounds overly detailed with some edge and has a plasticy, cardboardy coloration with some grain thrown in and loose bass. But, it's not all bad, during the burn-in you can still hear some very good attributes, so many run of the mill CD players have a homogeneous sound, the 740c has wonderful layering/seperation of instruments and vocals with excellent speed.
Similar Products Used: Jolida JD-100, Benchmark Dac 1, Eastern Electric Minimax, Rega Appolo |
[Dec 16, 2007]
dpl35
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
detailed sound
Weakness:
None so far This review is for the Cambridge Audio Azur 740C CD player. This unit is the same as the 840C with the exception of the lack of XLR outputs. I've owned it for about 5 weeks, so I now feel I can submit an educated review.
Similar Products Used: Lexicon RT10
|