Transparent, detailed sound when it worked--which was rarely.

It almost never worked. Ultimately, over $100 thrown to the winds after four months.

The HD-720 started by sounding harsh, but it smoothed out a good deal after a week or so of playing in to reveal a wide sound stage, complexity of sound, and good dynamics, though never the sweetness and ease that one used to associate with Harman Kardon. Even less like HK was the infuriatingly flimsy plastic transport, not even worthy of a $15 CDRW drive, and inadequately shielded thin internal wires. Soon, to no one's surprise, the unit started to have moments of CD non-recognition, silences with a flickering display in the middle of play, audible distortion if *anything*--even the paper-thin aluminum case itself!--was too close to the skimpy wires leading from the transport to the circuit board. All these preposterous problems were intermittent enough that an in-warranty inspection might not have yielded anything, and HK wouldn't have paid for it. Even if something had shown up to a tech person, the problems are so systemic to the terrible design that I doubt they could ever be solved--and I'm pretty experienced. I don't think this was just a "lemon": the model itself is a disaster. I haven't mentioned yet that one of the skimpy unshielded wires broke off from the 5-pin plug and I had to solder it back, voiding the warranty anyway. Finally, after four months, the problems made the unit unusable and I discarded it. For a unit with good electronics and sound to be defeated by the destructive cost-cutting of a non-transport, in a $350 list-price player, is an inexcusable scandal. Even the face-plate was a cheap plastic replica of the solid brushed metal one on its good predecessor, the HD-710. I should have paid attention when people told me that after the mid-1990s--at the very latest, HK was to be avoided. No wonder virtually all dealers have dropped them. If you see a post-1995 Harman Kardon, run the other way!

Similar Products Used:

Harman Kardon HD-710--transparent, sweet, built solidly; couldn't be less like its unbelievably junky successor the HD-720. My HD-710 has performed magnificently since 1995--except that the remote is virtually ineffectual. NAD 521i--built like a tank but ugly sounding: nasal midrange, harsh top. Like the 521BEE, 541i, 542i, it has an unreadable display, and no time-remaining-within-track feature, though the NAD web site lists it. Cambridge Audio 300SE--fascinating, transparent sound, but only intermittent CDR reading. Toshiba SD-1800 DVD player--not at all bad: sweet sound, if lacking in detail, and will play anything you put in it; a bit hard to operate as a CD player, since it's optimized for DVDs (of course). It was typically about $60 and is 1000% better than the HK HD-720! Magnavox CDCB-482--sweet sound, little error correction, but it lasted for fifteen years! Teac CD-P1250--run the other way even faster than with HK HD-702!!!

A number of operating niceties have been corrected since the HD-710.

Plastic replaces metal all over the place. Awful flimsy drawer and almost unlistenably harsh sound, both completely atypical of HK. And for what's in there, it's way too big and clumsy. HK finally sold out its values with this one. I finally bid a regretful farewell to the audio company that I loved all my life.

My favorite CD player since 1995 has been the Harman Kardon HD-710. My ancient second-system player, an old Magnavox CDB-482, died last July--RIP. I have been seeking to replace it ever since. I started with a Teac CDP-1250 which, despite a surprisingly sweet sound, died right after the labor warranty period expired; the horribly flimsy tray should have clued me in to its toy-like transport: $80 down the drain (take my premature positive review on this site as a warning). I have been using a Toshiba SD-1800 DVD/CD player. Very cheap, surprisingly well-built, plays everything, sweet if not a very complex or detailed sound; but it's difficult to manage as a CD player: virtually everything is on the remote; some things don't read out, like total tracks; it takes ages to load and close-and-play is absurdly mandatory. Harman Kardon no longer makes single-CD players. Imagine my delight when a Harman Kardon HD-720--the direct descendent of my great HD-710, appeared last week on Ebay from Sound Seller, for $99 brand new! Apparently it had been languishing in Sound Seller's warehouse for several years. The HD-720 arrived today. First inspection revealed it to be identical to its older brother the HD-710. Sadly, the similarities end with the first inspection. For whatever reason, HK decided suddenly to use a transport rather frighteningly similar to that of my dead Teac CDP-1250, complete with a drawer so flimsy that it's terrifying to touch. The front fascia is also plastic, a cheesy replica of the metal design on the HD-710. Positive characteristics: unlike the HD-710, you can scan backwards when the CD is inserted on the HD-720, a convenience. The three read-out display levels actually work: normal-dim-off, while the HD-710, claiming to do this, only has normal-off (I tried four units). The HD-720 remote, while embarrassingly shoddy, works from any angle; the HD-710 remote, though more solid, has to be pointed directly at the unit from the proper angle to have any effect, so I never use it. And the power switch on the HD-720 can actually turn the stand-by light off, which was impossible with the HD-710, so unlike the HD-710, one doesn't need to plug it into a switched outlet to keep the light off (and to keep it from burning out). Stand-by is a feature only on the HD-720 remote, which in this case is a relief. There's also a switch in back to turn off "instant play" when the unit is switched on with a CD in it; the lack of optional defeat of "instant play" is an annoynace on the HD-710. The circuitry on the HD-720 is supposed to be better: Burr-Brown vs. the Bitstream of the older HD-710, and 8x oversampling compared to the 4x of the HD-710. But the HD-710 sounds far better: sweet, open, easy, and detailed, with a great soundstage. At least now, the HD-720, while detailed, with a wide soundstage, is way too bright, forward, brittle, and not easy to hear. My little Toshiba is a bit muted by comparison, but even it's easier on the ears. Hopefully the brashness of the HD-720 will smooth out over time, but I never had to wait with the HD-710. I think that if I had paid the original $349 price for this player, I'd be very angry. For $99, I'm just disappointed that this is the model where Harman Kardon changed from pseudo-audiophile to pseudo-junk--and for a similar list price. I also expect that with the flimsy tray, it will end up in the trash before very long. I hope that at least the sound sweetens up a bit before that, but I doubt it. To the reviewer just below this one (Marshall, Aug 1, 2002): if you saw a Harman Kardon HD-710, you'd understand what everyone else is complaining about with regard to the HD-720.

Similar Products Used:

Harman Kardon HD-710: my favorite player, and so much better than the later HD-720 it isn't even worth comparing. NAD 521i: I don't really like it much--too antriseptic sounding--but unfortunately, it's a lot better than the Harman Kardon HD-720. Cambridge Audio 300SE: fascinating, if artificial, sound; terrible transport. Toshiba SD-1800 DVD/CD player: sweet, not complex, but more listenable than the HD-720. Magnavox CDB-482: late venerable player, very sweet, though virtually no error correctuion. Still, it lasted for fifteen years. Wish it was still alive.

Great deal for a hundred and fifty bucks! Except Fry's had no paperwork on it, and no remote. They wouldn't even sell me a 2 year warrenty extension. I can only hope for the best.

None for my application.

I don't get these reviews. I had to check a couple three times to make sure I had the same model these reviewers have. I picked up a demo at Fry's because the price was right for my purpose: have a unit on my desk at worked hooked to a Musical Fidelity X-Cans headphone amplifier. Plastic build quality??? What are people talking about? My top is made of metal. Flimsy tray??? That is one of the things that impressed me, for crying out loud! Silky smooth and silent. But the main thing I was interested in was the sound quality and I certainly have no complaints about that.

Similar Products Used:

Many different models over the years, most of which broke after a year or two of use. I have a Philips at home right now.

Sounded great before it broke, powerful headphone jack, digital out.

Awful build quality, broke in barely a year of light use, no standby or eject buttons on the remote

I bought this CD player online, sight unseen. If I had known how cheaply it was constructed, I would not have even considered it. The entire player, case and all, weighs maybe 4 lbs. The top flexed under the heavy weight of a full CD wallet. The remote control made creaking plastic noises when I pressed the buttons. The clear faceplate over the display never lined up right. I worried that the CD tray would break every time I used it. However, I was wrong, none of those things broke. What broke instead was the driveshaft and/or gearing of the electric motor that spins the disc. I figure that 300 hours of playing time before it died would be a generous estimate. It really seems wasteful to me to put together a pretty good set of electronics, upper end Burr-Brown DACs, a good headphone jack amplifier circuit, etc, and then pair that up with such a cheap and flimsy remote and housing. Well, they got my money this time, but Harman Kardon will never see another dime from me.

Similar Products Used:

Most of the CD players on the shelf at any Best Buy, Circuit City, etc.

Design,sound

Standby is available only from remote.

I''m a brand new owner for a couple days and am very pleased. This thing sounds good. I can hear now more and clearly details in music than before with my Pioneer PD M426changer. Stereo field is good eather.

Similar Products Used:

Pioneer PD M426

Price

The Plastic front

This is a very good buy if You're looking for a cheap "hifi" CD and only care how it sounds. If you want a rigid goodlooking CD you should reconcider. They should put a little more effort on the sledge and box. It's to unstable.
The sound is very ok for the price that is. You can't compare it with players that costs twice as much.
Overall it's a nice sounding player in my system.
Which is: H/K 620 amp. TDL T-line2 speakers. Mid-price cables.

Similar Products Used:

Various cheap CDs

Optimal sound quality for the price

Built quality

As I don't care that much about the the design/built quality it's "my winner"!
Exellent sound, best in it's price range!
Works good in the most of different combinations!

Similar Products Used:

Nad, Rotel, Onkyo etc. at same price range

Great sound, Clean, simple looks

Well...some say cheap, but I say you get what you pay for.

I like this CD player. I have owned it for almost 2 weeks now and it sounds sweeter everyday. I was a little concern reading some reviews about this cd player's build quality before I purchased it. However, when I got it home and finally seen it I realized the build quality is really not that bad. The CD tray is a bit flimsy and silent which usually means small motors and gears, but it opens and closes slowly and smoothly.

The sound quality on the other hand is very good. Everyday it sounds a little bit better. The first thing I noticed was smoother highs. Further auditioning revealed slightly more bass extension, better imaging, and I wider deeper soundstage(than my Yamaha). All the little changes added an overall large change to my system's sound.

I can understand poeple's grips with the build quality, but this CD player is not DJ equipment, it is meant for home use. The build quality doesn't concern me a bit. For the \PRICE// I honestly beleive this is a great CD player and is well worth the money.

If your looking for a great sounding and affordable CD player, this is clearly a good choice despite poeple's claim of cheap contruction.

This is an acceptable CD player.
Sound compares favorably to everything else I've heard in the <$300 range.

Build quality is minimal, though. Poorly fitted plastic throughout, a sharp edge on the remote that needed to be buffed smooth.

(Made in China. If slave labor over there can build a quality anything, I've yet to see it.)

Featurewise, it has everything you would expect of a player in this range. Coax digital out is nice if you have a seperate DAC. Controls are basic, but for a single disc player, how many buttons do you really need?

Sound and feature wise, this is a 5 star unit.

Fit and finish are what you'd expect on a $49.95 no name POS, though. There's no excuse for charging $230-300 for something built like this.

If they'd spent another 20 bucks to include a decent remote, beef up the tray, and fit it together properly, it'd be a 5 star no-brainer.

As it stands though, look elsewhere.

Audio Quality

lacks a bit on certain features

I am a great fan of Harman/Kardon.

I bought the HD 720 just because it was from Harman/Kardon.
I compared the audio output of HD 720 and my Toshiba SD 2109. I used a rather rough used CD on both. The SD 2109 denied reading the disc. HD 720 performed marvelously well with the damaged disc.
With Normal CDs I could figure out sound quality in both players. HD 720 did quite well as expected. Both players have coaxial outputs and anyone could figure out the difference in Sound Quality.
With a Normal CD with some tracks damaged I was really annoyed with the HD 720. The HD 720 keeps on trying to read the track endlessly. The SD 2109 did well skipping the portion.
Hey I found one button missing in my remote(the Open/Close) button in the remote(Well it is not a issue). Further there are two buttons( one "ON" and another "OFF"). I feel the "OFF" button could have been replaced by a Open/Close button.
In my HK avr35 I have a coaxial out as well as a Optical output. Harman should have provided a coaxial output as well with this player. I had to buy a separate converter for $45 for conversion of coaxial to optical.
On the whole I would suggest this player for anyone who wants Quality sound for $200. The cons given by me are what I feel would have made the player of my choice.

Similar Products Used:

Toshiba SD 2109 DVD Player(Comparing the CD output)