Marantz CD-17 K.I.Signature CD Players
Marantz CD-17 K.I.Signature CD Players
USER REVIEWS
[Oct 08, 2001]
y
Audiophile
Strength:
refined,smooth sound,tight bass. Looks great ,Excellent build quality.
Weakness:
Component matching must be careful or it will give you bright sound It's been at least a year I using this player. |
[Feb 03, 2001]
Ilko Alexandrov
Audiophile
Strength:
Very good detail, texture, Oustanding remote - other producers should take note!
Weakness:
2D imaging (3D of RCD 991 almost gone), soundstage, transperancy, uninvolving, tiring - cannot listen long to this CDP A non A/B Comparisson made between Rotel 991 & the Marantz.. System : Similar Products Used: Copland 266, Rotel 991, Theta Chroma |
[Aug 15, 1999]
J Mitchell
an Audio Enthusiast
Until recently my system consisted of;Arcam Alpha 7 CD |
[Nov 03, 1999]
Marino Marinkovic
Audiophile
Strength:
Transparency, realism, and timing. There is not much to say. This cd-player is just outstanding. I still can't believe my ears. I am constantly reexperiencing old cd's, they have a new life with the CD-17 KI. Everything is so detailed, yet at the same time delicate and sofisticated. This cd-player is really singing. Im using it with Marantz PM-17, ST-17, and Acoustic Energy AE 120 speakers. And I'm there! |
[Nov 30, 1999]
Paul Franklin
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Remarkably refined, smooth and generally detailed
Weakness:
Abit bland and lacking in the toe-tapping department. I found that I kept falling asleep, rather than listening to music for extended periods. I had a Marantz CD-63SE for 2 years, which I enhanced greatly with a Musical Fidelity X-Act DAC. I always lusted after the CD-17, or (hushed, reverent tones) a CD-17KI !! Similar Products Used: Roksan Caspian |
[Feb 01, 2000]
Audio Fan
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
refined,smooth sound,good looking I have hard time to decide between the rotel 991 & 17-ki, I compared the two and love both very much. The 17-ki is more refined player while the rotel is much aggressive. I ended up with the 17-ki b'cos the prices is only sg$ 50 diff while in UK, there are diff by $350 pound. I bought the 17-ki at Singapore dollar 1350. Similar Products Used: Rotel 991 |
[May 28, 2000]
Mark Perrin
Audiophile
Strength:
Bright airy sound, Cool Frog remote.
Weakness:
Poor bass and very uninvolving, Careful system matching essential. I Work in a Busy HiFi shop in Manchester and have been very fortunate in having the opportunity to try anything I wish in the comfort of my own home (without the cost, of course :). After extensive listening to a Marantz DR700 with an Arcam Black Box 500 DAC (my own) I found my Sony DVPS7700 to be beaten on sheer involvement and this gave me the thirst for better CD performance. The soundstage was stunning through my system, bass huge but not boomy and treble bright but not harsh, I havent listened to the DR700 bypassing my DAC (I wouldn't want to embarass it) but I have to say that so far this is probably the best combination of budget CD/DAC I have ever heard. The sheer soundstage and image/invlovement produced is excellent. Anyway back to the burning issue. I was so stunned at the performance of the EL cheapo unit that I had to try this. Both me and my girlfriend were listening at the same time and made the same conclusions both having slightly different opinions on what was wrong with each player. I have to say that I have demoed this piece of hardware on many occasion at work and it has been a firm favourite of mine for some time now, BUT... On every track played at home something was missing, CD's that I have had for ages and enjoyed very much in the past I just couldn't get into, in fact I was somewhat bored to listen to this player. Never before have I heard it sound so boring and uninvolving, It seemed spineless and on some aspects the sony DVPS7700 even bettered it (I never expected that). Its not that it didn't try because it did the treble was bright and tried to make up for the lack of soundstage but it was found to be very uninvolving. Very disappointing indeed. After playing this unit for extended periods my girlfriend found it unenjoyable and artificial. I was shocked to say the least because after all I had been so impressed in the shop environment but at home it was not for me. It sounded at its best with the Arcam BB500 DAC but was still no where near as involving or enjoyable as the DR700 With the DAC. Sorry to put a downer on it but it clearly doesn't suit my system. I'm sure its not a bad player it just proves that careful system matching and lengthy audition is a must for this player. Once again, Its NOT for me. (or my girlfriend) :-( The remote is cool though. Similar Products Used: Pretty much everything on the market. |