Roksan Caspian CD Players
Roksan Caspian CD Players
[Oct 07, 2000]
menachem toren
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
quality, sound, soundstage, reputation
Weakness:
display I AM VERY HAPPY WITH THIS CD PLAYER |
[Jul 30, 2000]
Galen Valentine
Audiophile
Strength:
Soundstage and imaging
Weakness:
Can occasionally hear the CD spinning Let me first say, any review of electronic equipment should be taken with a certain amount of skepticism. Components that sound outstanding in my system may not in yours. Having said that, I'm including a list of associated equipment at the end of this review. Reviews are helpful in narrowing a large list of choices. Similar Products Used: Sony DVD Player, MSB Link/McCormack Transport Combo, Sony multi-disc |
[Mar 21, 2000]
Sivalingam Rameish
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Heavy, retro styling, looks well built
Weakness:
Harsh sound, tracking problems Harsh sound. Very unmusical. There are certainly far better players out there that will better the Roksan Caspian. Quality contol is suspect as 2 units were found faulty. Buyers beware. The 2 years warranty as stated in the brochure doesn't apply to all markets. Roksan itself will honour it but the hassle and cost of shipping something this heavy is costly. Similar Products Used: Copland 289, Rotel 855 |
[Feb 22, 2001]
Viraj Theberis
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Natural (ie. not digital) sound, clarity and vibrance suited to classical, acoustics styles just as well as rock. Superb with modern music styles, forgiving on bad redoring. Build quality.Looks.
Weakness:
No HDCD, 24bit resolution, lack of certain useful features (e.g. random play) but bear in mind this is being fairly picky This is an 'entry level into the hi-end' CD player from a repsected British maker of hi-end vinyl turntables. As expected, great care and attention has been paid to build quality and solidity, this is a quality product weighing in at roughly 25pounds! Similar Products Used: Marantz, Sony,CD players,Kenwood & Sony Minidisk Player/Recorders |
[Sep 11, 1999]
Rob Dyte
an Audiophile
I have just gone through the process of upgrading my CD front end. This turned out to be a very long process. I first took home a Naim CD3, the sound was very upfront and harsh. You could not listen to this player for too longer period. Next, i took home a Primare D20 CD player, the complete opposite to the NAIM CD3. This player was very uninspiring to say the least. After thinking all CD players were lousy up stepped the Roksan Capsian. What can i say, this is the best CD player i have ever heard. The control, detail and general soundstage of this player is exceptional. I can hardly believe the difference. This has to be a veritable bargain at £895. |
[Dec 01, 2001]
Tony Whitfield
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Lovely open sound with bags of detail and air.
Weakness:
Drawer mechanism could be better. The Caspian has a lovely open sound and no harshness whatsoever. I previously owned the Marantz CD17 Mk2 which was much more upfront and brash. The Caspian is an altogether warmer, cleaner sound. Build quality is excellent, apart from the drawer which seems a bit fragile. Recommended for those who like lots of vocal prescence. Similar Products Used: Marantz CD17 MK2. |
[Dec 18, 1999]
Veda
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Forward, open, transparent
Weakness:
A bit harsh Sounds similar to the MSB Link DAC + cheap Harman changer. Good sound but overpriced. Used with the Caspian integrated and Acustik-Lab Melody Triple. Similar Products Used: many |
[Mar 05, 2001]
High End Friend
Audiophile
Strength:
Clear and transparent sound
Weakness:
Remote controll looks ugly ;-) (compared to the Roksan Kandy modell one) Yes, I did it. I upgraded my Roksan Kandy CD to a Roksan Caspian. I was happy with the Kandy, but now I´m very happy with the Caspian. The sound is much more clear and transparent. It is brilliant. Also the manufacturing seems to be very good, a strong cover and a good mechanic. I use it with Spendor 2/3 speakers and an Oktave VA 50 tubeamp. Speakercables are from Tara. The upgrade was the money really worth. I tried a lot of other CD´s but no one compared with the Caspian (in my configuration) at the moment. I you like a really true sound, its the player of your choice. |
[Apr 25, 1999]
Gord Mitchell
an Audio Enthusiast
Cd players have come a long way since they were first introduced. You can now get detail and performance from Cd players in this price range whereas only a few yars ago you had to pay 5-10 times as much. This CD player is a great example of what technology can do over time. This player replaced a Esoteric player which only a few years ago was the king of players and only a select few could own. Now a number of us with a little less to spend can enjoy the best that a CD has to offer. Just in time for the format to change to 24/96. |
[Apr 07, 2000]
Oliver Parvin
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Styling,Build,Performance
Weakness:
Maybe a fraction too bright at times I am lucky enough to own a Roksan Caspian CD player. After having an old Marantz CD63 for the past four years I felt it was time to upgrade my source component. The result was the Caspian. Having auditioned many players in the £400-£500 (British) pound range including the excellent Rotel RCD-971 I had the chance to get the Caspian for only £450 from an auction site (normally retails at £895). (NOTE: This was NOT second hand but brand new straight from the manufacturer!). I was able to audition a player at a local dealership and the sound quality was superb. The detail it grasped from each CD was impressive. The Caspian gave music a 'live' quality so often missing on CD's. It has a sound not unlike the Naim players but it is less 'in your face' and as such should appeal to a wider audience. The only critisism so far is that, on occasion if partnered with bright speakers and amps, it can sound a little too bright. Similar Products Used: Naim CD3 Marantz CD17 |