Sony CDP-XA7ES CD Players
Sony CDP-XA7ES CD Players
[Aug 24, 1998]
Ulrich R. Sikkema
an Audiophile
I bought my XA7ES half a year ago - used, for about $1200. The former owner found a Krell to be better. Unfortunately, I did not (yet) do much direct a/b comparison with other CD players. So my opinion is based on memory, take it with a grain of salt. |
[Sep 21, 2000]
Kurniawan Tedjo
Audiophile
Strength:
Built Like A Tank, Very Detail
Weakness:
Heavy Truly Great Product. I never thought that Sony could come out with such a fine product. The sound from this CD Player is very detail and the Bass is excellent. Need a good current AC to get most of the sound. Good line conditioner is very recommended. I compared to my first system CD player, Meridian 508.20 and the difference only slight in the soundstage. Meridian produce more airy sound than Sony but Sony has tighter bass. Both are a very Good system. No wonder Stereoreview gives both Class A. Sony has better and smoother tray compared to Meridian and much more heavier. Similar Products Used: Meridian 508.20 |
[Aug 05, 1998]
Chuck Frady
an Audio Enthusiast
Regarding everyone's posts pertaining to soundstage, midrange, extended lows. Meridian vs Krell vs Sony vs etc. All players ultimately use a laser pickup to read Digital information off the disk. Ones and Zero's boys and girls. They all read the disk the same way. Digitally.The sound is created via the Digital to Analog circutry. No modification of sound quality comes from the actual read stage of the disk / laser. |
[Jun 18, 1998]
Trance
an Audiophile
After reading all the reviews I had to get this cd player. I just lovewhen a product comes out and its compared to other products costing 5 times |
[Apr 16, 1998]
Willie Goh
an Audiophile
The SONY CDP XA7ES is truly a world class player. I have listened to others costing much more money with little improvement or lesser sound quality in my opinion. I listen to jazz, folk, classical, operas, and some pop. This player is able to resolve the subtle details that I have not heard before on my CDs. |
[Jan 06, 2002]
Abe Collins
Audiophile
Strength:
Solid and smooth transport. Nice smooth sound.
Weakness:
Dated technology, not as much air or detail as state-of-the art high-end CD players. System: Similar Products Used: Cary 306/200 CD Player. MSB Gold Link III External DAC. Denon DCD-1650AR, CAL Icon MKII. |
[Jan 22, 1998]
ASCHU
an Audiophile
I owned a XA7ES for about 3 weeks. It sounded great, but s**t happen. I kept most of my gear on all the time. With the XA7ES, after about 30 minutes of playing, the cd weight gets pretty warm to touch. I assume this is by design until one day, there was something wrong with the microprocessor -- it won't acknowledge a disk in the transport. I returned it for an exchange, but obviously the player was in short supply, and the dealer can't get me one with any certainty. SO I get my money back and decided to pick one up myself on my trip to Japan. In Japan, I have a chance to compare the XA7ES to its sister XA50ES (with selectable variable filter coefficients, and not available in the US). To cut the long story short, I bought the XA50ES because I felt the highs are even better, and it cost less than half the list price. It's a mystery why SONY sells it in the rest of the world, but not in the US (may be it has a lot to do with good reviews of the XA7ES). Look out for the XA70ES with variable filter coefficients, it may be right around the corner............ |
[Feb 11, 1998]
Leland Li
an Audiophile
I needed a cd player for my home theathre system, since my dvd players ability to play cds was not good enough. I have a dvd-s7000, so a xa7es was a natural choice. For the price this cd player has no peers. |
[Feb 11, 1998]
Paul Mangen
an Audiophile
Why is the XA7ES not sold in England ? I listened to this unit while in Hong Kong and I'd have to disagree that the XA50ES sounds as good ( although definantly not bad )...the XA7ES is as good as it gets and much more reasonbly priced than the gear it betters, I love it ! |
[Feb 12, 1998]
Mechir
an Audio Enthusiast
I currently have the XA7ES in my home for an audition. The dealer got the player brand spankin' new therefore it is still green; boy is it ever. For the first hour when I plugged it in and started playing the highs were screechy and orchestral passages were not coherent (incomprehensible). Over a period of a few hours however, I think that the power supply must have settled down because the player started producing some very good music. For comparison, I also heard the Sonic Frontiers SFCD-1, Mark Levinson No. 39, Proceed All in One, Classe CDP.5, and Krell KPS20. I found that the Sony was very close to the attitude of the Levinson and Krell players (neutral with no colouration, slightly bright but VERY open). The Sonic sounded more "coloured" with a pleasant euphonic colouration that seemed to emphasize the bass. The transport mechanism on the Sony is another story though: tactile feel, robustness, and refinement hint to me that the transport is the best that can be had anywhere. In summary, I found the Sony player to be the virtual equal of the Levinson player and just slightly less revealing than the Krell player (at less than 1/2 the cost). I think that my audition may lead to a permenant addition to my Hi-Fi. For the value and sound quality 5 stars! |