Marantz DR-17 CD Recorders/Players
Marantz DR-17 CD Recorders/Players
USER REVIEWS
[Mar 25, 2001]
Frank F.
Audiophile
Strength:
Excellent Build, ease of use, great digital & analogue recording capability. Superior playback
Weakness:
No seperate right & left level adjustments An overall excellent A/D recorder & player. Most cd recorders suffer as players but the DR-17 excells in both areas. Similar Products Used: Marantz DR-700 Elite PDR-99 |
[Jan 09, 2000]
michael geerts
Audiophile
Strength:
overall excellent build-quality, high fidelity sound of all music style, build to use for another millenium
Weakness:
none, none, none not so many words, it is superb Similar Products Used: no |
[May 26, 2000]
Scott
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent Build Quality & Sonics
Weakness:
A Little Nasty High End, Brand New, Not Broken In Fully I brought this CD Recorder home from a dealer to audition as a recording mate for my Classe CD Player. When I first put a disc in, immediately the soundstage was more expansive, timbre was quite good and the Marantz was more musically involving than my Classe. It had great pace, neutrality and transparency. It isn't as warm as the Classe, but more ALIVE! I am still a little concerned about the harsh high frequencies. It was nasty on dynamic transients. I have been breaking it in from new for about 50 hours. The high end is settling down gradually and starting to sweeten up. I think I am going to like this player very much!! Similar Products Used: Classe CDP-.5. My System is:McIntosh MC352 Amplifier, McIntosh C15 Preamp, Magneplanar MG1.6qr, Philips Turntable, Nakamichi Cassette Deck. |
[Apr 06, 2000]
Mike
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Construction, 3-year warranty, records AND plays HDCD encoded CD's, excellent CD playback quality.
Weakness:
Quality of digital CD-R recordings. Price is $1500.00 and it's a reference series, but not pro model so you still have to use expensive audio CD-R's. The CD-Sync function chopped off the beginning few seconds of many songs I recorded and forced me to record manually. I bought it primarily for the purpose of creating custom mixes of my CD collection. I didn't think the quality of the recording was much better than that made by the Phillips CDR-765 dual try recorder I tried a few months ago. Similar Products Used: Phillips CDR-765 dual tray recorder ($550). |
[Aug 29, 2000]
Dave
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
idiot proof; exceptional built, performance & ergonomics
Weakness:
expensive Outperforms the Pioneer and Philips machines by a mile in both sound and ease of use. Makes very good to outstanding digital and analog recordings depending on brand of CD used. Very intuitive controls makes recording a breeze. Since I record mostly analog, the CD Sync delay is a non-issue. Excellent playback quality - a tad better than the CD17mkII that it replaced in my system. Same great bass and cleaner highs. I think the PMD100 digital filtering chip may be responsible, since the circuit topologies of the two machines appear otherwise identical. Only caveat - wish it had track index identification. Bottomline: expensive but worth it! Similar Products Used: Pioneer PDR509, Philips CDR770 |