Marantz DR-6000 CD Recorders/Players
Marantz DR-6000 CD Recorders/Players
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 23, 2004]
jvshort
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Copies equal to original. User-friendliness. Ease of use with analogue sources. Astonishing sound as a player.
Weakness:
Works with "audio only" blanks only. Reliability (went wrong after two years' use, cost € 160 to repair) (This review may be useful for those searching for a second-hand recorder,as it seems the model has been discontinued). Excellent recorder. It makes exact copies from digital sources (CD), as long as you don't use poor quality blank CDR-CDRWs. Very user-friendly once you get used to it. I've done a lot of recording from analogue sources too (mainly vinyl) and I must say it's a real pleasure (I advise you to keep your LPs as clean as possible!) The DR 6000 is also astonishing as a player. I sometimes alternate it with my NAD CD player. A shame, though, that it is not as reliable as its brand and price suggest. After only two years use (non-intensive), the recorder went wrong (it wouldn't recognise any disc), and it cost € 160 to put right. To sum up: if you are searching for a good (second-hand) cd recorder, that makes exact copies and plays fine, this is it. If you are looking for new material, the Tascam professional machine could be a good alternative at the price. A last advice: even if you have a built-in cd burner in your computer, as I have, consider having a hi-fi cd recorder like this one, for quality as well as practical reasons. Similar Products Used: Plex Writer computer cd burner. NAD 524i CD player. |
[Jun 17, 2003]
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
High-quality of recordings and playback
Weakness:
Totally unreliable. Service and support from Marantz abysmally poo Sonically, this is a first-rate product as a recorder and especially as a CD player in its own right. Using the best music CD-Rs, such as TDK, copies of CDs are indistinguishable from the originals and if at all they sound better in that they lose some of the tension/ringing/glaring of these latter. On playback of commercially recorded discs, the sound is smooth and sweet, dynamic, open and detailed, with very good imaging, soundstage width and depth. Bass has slam and transients are reproduced with plenty of snap. It gives a pretty good account of itself with high-resolution equipment, like Conrad-Johnson tube preamps and amps. Unfortunately, my experience has shown this model to be totally unreliable. The refurbished unit I bought would not accept remote-control commands. The authorized repair shop could not fix it and it had to go back to Marantz. After FOUR months they sent me another refurbished machine as replacement, which immediately proved to be defective. It took another TWO months for Marantz to finally send me a new unit as replacement. It worked fine until today, when it stopped recording CDs after the first few tracks, updating the disc in such a way as to make it unusable. It keeps doing that on all recording modes. The one-year warranty on refurbished unit (3 years on new ones) has expired and now I'm stuck with a machine that I can use only for playback. I hope that at least it continues to perform as player for some time to come. After three tries, it seems a reasonable conclusion that there's something wrong with the design of this product, at least as a recorder. So be forewarned... |
[Jun 13, 2003]
Jcampos
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
** Precise Imaging ** HDAMs (Previously available only in flagship Marantz components ** No listener's fatigue ** Outstanding Player and Recorder
Weakness:
- None - I purchased the DR 6000 as a CD Recorder and also as a CD Player after some pain-staking research. All of the previous review sum it up - this player/recorder is a bargain. For those not familiar with Marantz product, this player includes High Definition Amplifier Modules. These modules are used instead of cheaper Op Amps on the pre-out stage to give music greater detail, depth, and more air in between instruments. Unfortunately Marantz no longer includes these somewhat costly additions in there Home Theater line up, that is why I decided to purchase a component from there previous line. The sound difference is without a doubt noticable - I would even say night and day! I'm currently using this player/recorder with a Parasound P/HP 850 Preamp and a pair of Marantz MA 6100 THX Ultra 125w Monoblocks. The combination is a complete and utter success with precise imaging, a soundstage with depth, and does not fatigue the listner even after a couple of hours of hardcore listening! I would recommend using the best interconnects you can afford with this player if you're not running a digital output. I would recommend this player/recorder to anyone! Similar Products Used: Onkyo CD Burner Harmon/Kardon Burner Sony DVP7700 |
[Nov 30, 2002]
Kurt28
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Made in JAPAN! Music is cleaner, tighter, sharper than a $200 DVD player.
Weakness:
Bass not quite loud enough, but it's there. I was actually looking for the latest Marantz CD6000 cd player, but no one carried them,finally went to one dealer but had the DR6000 instead and was offered at a price that was a steal. Hooked it up to my Marantz receiver and immediately the sounds were fresher and the voices fuller. This is a great player! Haven't tested the recording yet. |
[Nov 09, 2002]
Darragh Sinnott
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
It's a classy CD recorder that can also shoulder up with dedicated CD players.
Weakness:
A bit over-priced if you just want to record CD's. Otherwise, it can't be faulted. IMHO I guess the good points have already been covered in earlier reviews, and I agree with them, it's a superior product. As a recorder I can't fault it when you take the viewpoint that making CD copies is the goal and I would be a liar to say I could tell the difference between the original CD and the copy made by this machine. As a player, it's a little bit harsh compared to the likes of the Marantz CD6000KI (in my case), though I suppose it's not a fair comparison, and by way of mitigation I should say, for what it's worth, that the difference between it and my previous dedicated player, (Marantz CD6000OSE LE), is not as obvious. On the other hand, I did notice that the tray mechanism was quite a bit less sophisticated compared to the KI or the OSE LE, and also that the CDR/CDR-RW disk finalising time is indeed slower compared a more recent CDR unit that I've used. However that's nothing I can't live with. (IMHO) If you want a good CD player that can also record, then I don't know of any better that this. Similar Products Used: MARANTZ CD6000OSE LE MARANTZ CD6000KI PIONEER PDRW839 |
[Oct 30, 2002]
Denniz
AudioPhile
Strength:
Sound. Build. Looks.
Weakness:
Sudden recordings not as fast as cassette recorder. Good value for the money. Copies are excellent, especially via the electrical digital cable. Just one minor issue: it's not a fast operator (compared to an old cassette recorder). If you want to record something you suddenly hear on the radio, it will take about 10 seconds before the recording starts. First you have to select "Rec Type" (displays for 10 seconds: "Wait"), until "Press Record" appears. Then the recording starts. Similar Products Used: none. |
[Feb 21, 2002]
victor cubi
AudioPhile
Strength:
quality of playback sound, and recordings nearly as the original.
Weakness:
It can produce a little of auditive fatigue. I wanted to buy a good recording machine, and, at the same time to optimice my actual CD (Denon DCD 1550-R)and all I have to say is that anyone interested in this machine can buy it with confidence. It has a beautiful sound and is perfect as a recording. Better in black than in gold plated (I don´t know why, but the sound is softer & warmer) Similar Products Used: None. Only PC´s |
[Feb 21, 2002]
victor cubi
AudioPhile
Strength:
quality of playback sound, and recordings nearly as the original.
Weakness:
It can produce a little of auditive fatigue. I wanted to buy a good recording machine, and, at the same time to optimice my actual CD (Denon DCD 1550-R)and all I have to say is that anyone interested in this machine can buy it with confidence. It has a beautiful sound and is perfect as a recording. Better in black than in gold plated (I don´t know why, but the sound is softer & warmer) Similar Products Used: None. Only PC´s |
[Feb 07, 2002]
barri
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
good sound
Weakness:
2 machines gone down i wonder what next one will refuse to do initial thoughts on using cdr 6000 very good.but after 1 month machine packed in.enter replacment this one refused to finalize sony discs. no prob use another brand.works fine, but now willnot play various pre rec cds.wait rep Similar Products Used: traxdata |
[Apr 18, 2001]
Mike
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
* Excellent recording quality on some CDR
Weakness:
Very poor coax cable is supplied for a recorder of this price/quality Second best recorder after the Yamaha CDR 1000 (no longer available in Belgium since December 2000). The Yamaha was so good they replaced it by a lesser god, the dual tray CDR-D651 at a smaller price. So second choice in the international polls was this Marantz DR 6000. Similar Products Used: none |