Sennheiser HD433 Headphones
Sennheiser HD433 Headphones
USER REVIEWS
[Nov 12, 2000]
Sam
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
-Price
Weakness:
-Lacks midband response Initially, they sounded overly bright. I could not listen to them for extended periods of time. But after about 1 full months use, the brightness of the phones have faded and is now very natural sounding. I think the comments about the brightness is because they havent really worn in headphones. Give it time and it will reward you. Similar Products Used: various cheap ones, sony fontopia buds, sony street gear |
[Dec 05, 2000]
Darwin
Audiophile
Strength:
Pretty good sound
Weakness:
Only pretty good sound I have been listening to these cans for about an hour now, I don't know if there is such a thing as a break in period. They are pretty good for the $22 including shipping, but far from perfect. My office PC won't drive them very loud. There is a peak at about 1.5 - 2 KHz that often causes a shrill ringing on voices that will drive you up the wall. Also the vocals sound a little squeeky and false. The upper bass/lower midrange is a bit muddy and blurred. The range above about 5 KHz is rolled off a little too much so that you miss some of the sense of depth to the sound. So these are not really true hifi, just pretty good mid-fi. Of course, there probably isn't another $22 set of cans that are anywhere near as good so they are a good value. You can certainly get much better for more money, they don't compare at all to my AKG K240s. The K240s are a bit too conspicuous in the office for my tastes and I bought these for the office. I also bought a couple of the Senn Hd26s recently and they have a limited frequency range, but they don't have that very annoying midrange peak that causes incredible distortion. I may have to buy still another set of good phones. Stay away from Sonys, they suck. Similar Products Used: Other Senns, Sonys, AKG, Koss |