Grado SR-125 On-Ear
Grado SR-125 On-Ear
[Jun 27, 1999]
KEN
an Audio Enthusiast
I really enjoy listening to these heaphones. I don't have to be concerned with lousy room acoustics (which would cost a fortune to correct), amplifiers and high end cables. Heaphones make sense if you are on a tight budget and/or cursed with a lousy room. While they are no substitute for a good speaker/room combo,they can sound quite satisfying! I'm thinking of purchasing a HEADROOM amp in the future but I am not sure if it will make a huge difference. I've listened to the X-CANS before and the results were not very overwhelming. |
[Jul 09, 1999]
Doug Miller
an Audio Enthusiast
I listen to headphones quite a bit. For the money you can't match the sound. Ilisten to 'classic rock' and jazz. I have listened to quite a few headphones |
[Aug 11, 2001]
Jamal Jefferson
Audiophile
Strength:
price
Weakness:
horrible comfort, or lack of!! These headphones were so damn uncomfortable that they made my ears numb. Read the reviews at goodcans.com and they will tell you about the comfort problem. Anyways they sound alright but get some Sennheisers and you wont' bother with the terrible fit and finish of GRADO's Similar Products Used: Sennheiser 600's |
[Aug 11, 2001]
Jay Pearson
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Incredible sound and comfort. Pleasing retro-style looks.
Weakness:
Lots of plastic, give the impression they might be a tad fragile. Bought the Sony 600s seven years ago and lacking anything better for comparison thought they were pretty good. Well, they're certainly better than the $25 sports 'phones sold at the local Circuit City, but for any serious listening they're sorely lacking... Bass is non-existent and highs are shrill. For the price they suck. Anyway, having recently upgraded my living room A/V system I decided to look into some better phones. First tried the 240s. Was very impressed with their comfort and extraordinary sonic spaciousness, but they lack any real bass and are very hard to drive on portable players or PCs. Next looked into the 7506s. They're a huge improvement over the 600s but I found them to be uncomfortable and thought the bass was much overemphasized, to the point of obscuring the mids and highs. Being closed they lack much in the way of any spacial feel to the sound. Also, the "pleather" lining of the pads is obviously paper-thin and prone to wearing out as was seen on both demo models at the local Mars Music outlet. Similar Products Used: AKG-240DF, Sony MDR-7506, Sony MDR-V600 |
[Nov 25, 1999]
Terence
Audio Enthusiast
Everything that needs to be said about this pair of phones have already been said in the reviews before mine. Astonishing sound staging and amazing clarity. The midrange and treble really comes right through and bass response is one of the best I've heard. After getting them, I find myself listening to my cans more often than not. The only bit I can say is that they aren't one of the most comfortable pair of cans I've owned, get a pair of Senns if that's what you want. Apart from that, I'd recommend them to anyone. |
[Aug 16, 1999]
Trevor Haskett
an Audio Enthusiast
I've had these phones for a little over a week now, and still run them overnight, cuz the sound just keeps getting smoother. When I was in the audio store, I was doing the last round of comparison between the SR80 and SR125's. I had pretty much come to the conclusion that the SR125 presented _way_ more of the image, when the left phone of the SR80's conked out. I don't know what this says of the quality... but they had been the demo model for a couple of years now. Anyhow, when the new ones were brought out, they had the improved ear cups and were way more comfortable than before. Of course, these were fresh out of the box, and sounded kind of sibilant in the highs. Easy proof that you need to break these puppies in. Now that I have the SR125's at home, I'm hearing new things in every CD I own. I'm talking about bass riffs that don't even come through my 12" woofers, and the clarity to discern the tone of each note. If you play guitar, you'll get a kick out of the way you can hear fingers sliding on the strings, and the pick bouncing off a power chord. When an artist slams a deep piano chord, I smile at the clicking sound that the strings make for a heartbeat. Plain-old more information. |
[Oct 01, 1999]
jason squires
an Audiophile
The SR 125's are an absolutely phenomenol value. At approx. 150 dollars they aren't cheap but they'll blow away anything that you get in a home stereo for the same amount. Bass is deep and extended. The best thing about these headpones is thier ability to articulate every detail in the music. If it's there you'll hear it! everything sound stands out and yet fits in at the same time. Highly recommended. |
[Mar 20, 2001]
H. Dao
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clear mids & highs. Bass is much more extended than the SR-60's. Hearty wires and gold plated 1/4" plug. Price.
Weakness:
Exposes bad recordings. I got into headphones a few months ago. My old Koss phones were adequate and I didn't believe headphone sound could get much better for under 100 clams. Then I found the Grado SR-60's and was floored. Similar Products Used: Grado SR-60 |
[Feb 24, 2001]
Mike Flanagan
Audiophile
Strength:
Lots of bass, but boomy
Weakness:
These hurt my ears so much I had to sell them I previously had a pair of Sennheiser 570's that I loved. Unfortunately, my little brother "borrowed" them to take away to college. He (and I love those phones). Similar Products Used: Sennheiser 570 |
[Dec 30, 2000]
neuromancer
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
clarity, detail
Weakness:
ergonomics, build First impressions weren't very good. The plastic enclosures looked and felt cheap, as does the vinyl headband. But the SOUND! And all is forgiven. The mids/highs are extremely clear and sharp, and incredibly detailed. The bass is good and very tight with no trace of muddiness. Overall, an extremely dynamic headphone. Similar Products Used: Sennheiser HD500 |