JVC HR-S7800U VCRs
JVC HR-S7800U VCRs
USER REVIEWS
[Jun 06, 2002]
Rob
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Amazing noise reduction system that works better than advertised
Weakness:
longevity issues, light build materials Before I give my 2 cents here, I want to qualify something. I have been involved with home video and video editing for almost 12 years now. While I am by no means a professional, I DO know what I am talking about. I have used and tested dozens of pieces of VHS equipment over the years and have owned 6 JVC SVHS vcrs. What I say here comes from long experience, and are not the kind of knee-jerk reaction you typically see on user/net reviews. After doing some reading on the DigiPure NR system, I found that all models from the 7800 (now 7900) and up have it. This looked promising, as the 7800 was only $300-400. After finding a review on audioreview that referenced Crutchfield as a very good vendor, I went to their site. Not only did they have it for a lot less ($199) but they had it in scratch and dent for $169! I placed the order and in 4 days had the VCR. Excellent job by crutchfield. Now for the VCR itself. It delivers. Plain and simple, the DigiPure noise reduction system really does work. Most of what I have is in EP speed, and this VCR cleans up the video dramatically. When you hit play, for a couple of seconds, the image looks like fairly standard EP VHS: a little noise, kinda dull, good color. Then the NR kicks in and the image clears right up. It does brighten, and the background noise that tends to "swim" and flicker smooths right out. Even the edges look a little sharper. The trade off is a slightly soft picture, and a loss of a little of the fine details. But on an older tape, this wont matter much, and you get a much less "busy" image, much much smoother and easier to watch. For reference, I am watching this on a brand new 27" Panasonic with s-video. I am VERY happy with this VCR. My only concern and caveat is that VCR's in the past few years have been built very cheaply and disposably. And JVC have always had a problem with their VCR's mechanicals, especially the tape loading mechanisms, lasting more than a couple of years. I have owned several since 1990, and they all had this failing. So, while I might end up buying another in a year, I recommend this to ANYONE who wants to get the best image out of their old tapes. Similar Products Used: every major JVC svhs vcr since 1990 |
[Mar 27, 2002]
Paul Heroy
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
S-VHS, price
Weakness:
Build quality, quality control Disappointing step down from 7600. I''ve had 3 7800s and none have worked properly. Either the digital TBC/NR or Video Stabilizer circuit have not functioned correctly in 3 units I''ve tried. Similar Products Used: JVC 7600 JVC 9500 |
[Feb 24, 2002]
secstate
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
TBC and digtial noise reduction (when it works)
Weakness:
Problems with TBC and digtial noise reduction. Weak performance without TBC and digitial noise reduction. Like many of the reviews discuss below, the physical build quality this unit is pretty poor. But certainly no worse than any other VCR made today other than $1000+ semi-pro and pro units. The great selling point of this VCR is the built in Time Base Corrector and Digital Noise reduction. This make any amazing difference in picture quality but have one fatal flaw. One a large number of tapes engaging these features cause a preiodic tearing of the picture at the top of the screen. This occurs anywhere from once every 30 mins to nearly all the time depending on the tape. I can find no correlation between this problem and the tape. Some old tapes in poor condition don''t have the problem and some new tapes in excellent conditon do. For whatever reason the problem appears to manifest itself much more often on prerecorded tapes. I have seen several similiar compaints in other forums about this problem (avsforum.com) so I don''t believe that my unit is defective. Also the TBC can only be used for tapes that played on the machine (i.e., it does not effect recording and it does not effect signals that are being passed thorugh the VCR). With the TBC and digital noise reduction disabled, the picture quality of this units is below average, with it on it is very much above average. Unfortunately given the problem it has with at least 50% of the tapes I tried, I am going to return the unit. Perhaps the 9800 with 4 megs of digital memory would not have this problem. Similar Products Used: JVC 3800, two six year old Sony VCRs |
[Dec 25, 2000]
Geoff
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
In SP mode recordings made off DBS are almost identical to the source. Pretty cheap price.
Weakness:
"ET" mode that allows S-VHS recordings with regular VHS tape isn't that good - you'd be better off sticking with S-VHS tape. It's made of cheap feeling/looking plastic. I first bought a 9800u which I ended up exchanging for this model - it's over $200 cheaper and really is only missing some editing feature from the 9800u, which I didn't need. Similar Products Used: Sony regular VHS S-320u, Mitsu S-VHS, JVC-9800u |
[Aug 28, 2000]
Richard Hanna
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Smaller
Weakness:
looks and feels cheap Compared to the JVC HR-S7600U, this thing is a piece of cheap junk. Gone is the jog dial on the VCR's shuttle ring. How's that for an editing VCR? The PRO SLOW motion has less speeds! Pressing the buttons on the VCR itself is like pushing on cheap plastic. This is a travesty. JVC must have needed some bigger profit margins. One good addition is an audio monitor button on the remote. Otherwise, if you're like me and already own the 7600 model, you won't believe your eyes. If you can find the 7600, buy it! JVC should be ashamed of themselves. This is comparable to Pioneer's cheapening of their laser disc players in that format's dying years. Even the labeling of the audio/video jacks behind the VCR haven't been painted to make them visible. That must have saved JVC a fortune. Similar Products Used: JVC HR-S7600U |
[May 01, 2001]
Lisa
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent picture quality in SVHS (SP). Ease of use.
Weakness:
Remote is not backlit. The picture quality is beautiful - even from cable tv. I think that the tuner in the vcr helps to clean up the cable noise, as well. (I also have a 9600, which has equally beautiful picture quality.) I only tape in SVHS (SP mode) so I can't comment on SVHS-ET or on tapes made in EP mode. Before buying this unit, I tested two different Panasonic 4820 units. Either they were both defective or they both made horrible tuner lines on the tapes. In any event, the JVC 7800 is heads above the Panasonic. (I have had good success with last year's Panasonic SVHS model but the picture quality on the 7800 is better than that one, too.) I have a universal remote so the fact that the JVC remote isn't backlit doesn't bother me too much. I do use the JVC remote to set up timer recordings and it would help if it was backlit. Highly recommended. Similar Products Used: JVC 9600; Various Panasonic SVHS models |
[Dec 17, 2000]
DAVE
Audiophile
Strength:
Playback/record picture quality. Digital TBC (time-base-correction) and noise reduction get rid of horizontal jittering and the slight red/blue frame-to-frame noise visible on black areas of the screen. Works even with old video tapes. No blurring or pixelization are visible. Includes cable mouse to change channels on cable box.
Weakness:
VCR auto-tracking doesn't work that well. Remote control really only works with the VCR, Otherwise you must use 2 hands every time to control TV or cable box. The digital TBC stabilizes all of the line-to-line jitters from all your old video tapes, and the noise reduction works without blurring the picture! Finally something done right. No digital pixel artifacts are noticeable. The TBC only works on playback mode - it doesn't clean up "video in" from other vcr's. Similar Products Used: JVC HR-D910U, magnavox, sharp |
[Sep 09, 2001]
Mike
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Loaded with features missing on so many run-of-the-mill units. Records SVHS on regular VHS tapes. Many "auto" type features like auto tracking, auto tape speed. Svideo output. Excellent output
Weakness:
None really. Almost all VCR's today are light weight and plastic. No different from most that I have purchased in the past. Remote is a bit odd, but usable. No need to reinvent the review, previous ones pretty much cover it. In spite of it's less than stellar reviews, I noticed that the bashers were angry about some features being eliminated on this newer model. Do people in this day and age REALLY believe that a higher model number and/or newer model dictates a more equiped/better model? In that case, send them over to by the Kia 9000. Give me a break, one must always consider features and construction on any product. Similar Products Used: Sony, Toshiba, Sears(yuck!!!) |
[Jan 12, 2002]
Steve I
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
SP recording, ET mode
Weakness:
prone to dropouts This machine makes terrific recordings in SVHS and SVHS ET SP mode. I can barely tell a difference from the original cable signal. EP mode is noticeably poorer, but unfortunately I have to use the EP mode in everyday recording, because I barely have room for all those videotapes on my shelves as it is. Similar Products Used: 9 year old Panasonic HiFi VCR |
[Jan 26, 2002]
Jim Brock
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent picture in S-VHS.Easy setup. Quiet operation.
Weakness:
Light build quality In response to some of the negative reviews I say,"Picky,picky,picky!!!". Is the VHS-ET picture as good as S-VHS? No. Is the VHS-ET picture better than VHS? From what I have seen the picture in VHS-ET mode is slightly better and quite passable for taping regular TV fare on regular tapes.The S-VHS picture is excellent considering the medium.The unit is lighter than my old Sharp VCR but everything works fine.The unit does not contain sophisticated video editing features but whar unit in this price range does? It is fine for editing my Hi8 camcorder tapes. Similar Products Used: Sharp VCR 10 years old. |