Sony SLV-R1000 VCRs
Sony SLV-R1000 VCRs
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 30, 2015]
Vanderbil
Audio Enthusiast
As an electronics technician, I have services many types of VCRs over the years and have come to conclude Sony VCRs to have been superior in both consumer and professional grade units. Most professional recording and broadcast studios still use Sony machines for control room editing. I have used a SLV-R1000 since 1994, and it still operates flawlessly. I did have to replace a guide arm gear and do a general cleaning about 10 years in but other than that, the unit works fine. The only shortfall is with a lack of toslink and /or HDMI connectors for output to newer TV/ monitors. However, there are several S-video to HDMI converters products that offer 740i/1080i video quality close to high definition |
[Jan 06, 2003]
Composer
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Superb image quality, flexible control
Weakness:
Did not last past a year. This vcr was pretty awesome until 2003 came along, it is giving me shaky pictures and I don't know if it's fixable. I have take it to a vcr shop and see how it turns out. Having paid so much for it I thought it would have lasted me more. Similar Products Used: none |
[Jan 04, 2001]
Dennis
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great display and build. Input level adjustment. Picture sharpness adjustment.
Weakness:
Grainy picture, cumbersome remote This is my first S-VHS deck and so far I'm pretty satisfied with it, even though it wasn't what I expected a first(I expected no difference between the tape and the source, so I guess I was expecting too much). I noticed that reds are faded when playing back recorded material on S-VHS tapes. Picture is a little grainy. I have 2 of these decks: 1 used and the other new. I wouldn't say that it's worth the $1000+ dollars that Sony sells it for, but it's a great quality machine and a reliable workhorse. To keep from wearing this good piece of machinery out, buy a videotape rewinder. I'm going to give this machine 4 stars. |
[Jun 22, 2001]
Jim Kladis
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Shuttle Remote, Front Inputs, Detailed Front Display, High Speed Rewind
Weakness:
Noisy Tape Transport System Let's face it, this is an old VCR. When Sony came out with this model in 1993 it was $649 at my local authorized dealer. Now in 2001, on the brink of it's demise it's cost is in the range of $800 - $1100. There is only one problem: Similar Products Used: SONY SLV-595HF |
[Sep 01, 1999]
Mark
an Audiophile
This is a very good VCR. The S-VHS quality is much better than standard VHS. I have a DVP-S7000 DVD player and when i record off of DVD onto S-VHS the difference is minimal. Its only about a 10% loss where as a standard conversion would be like 50% loss. The DVD transfer to S-VHS looks much better than store bought movie. |
[Apr 06, 2001]
Stuart
Audio Enthusiast
After 13 years with a JVC VHS Hi-Fi VCR that suddenly and catastrophically failed, I went out to purchase a replacement. I unfortunately found it impossible to find the qualities I wanted in even today's top-of-the-line models. My JVC had recording levels on the display screen, panel switches for combining audio inputs from the stereo with video inputs from the cable (important in these days of digital cable boxes which don't output stereo audio via the RF line but only via the lines going to the stereo), and the ability to playback audio from the HiFi tracks simultaneously with audio from the normal tracks. All these options seem to have vanished for some reason. Moreover, on screen displays seem to be the order of the day...very annoying as I frequently would set up my VCR for timer recordings without needing to turn on the television. Not anymore. |
[Aug 20, 1999]
Vincent Lo Presti
an Audio Enthusiast
I still don’t understand why the S-VHS format never became more popular, when the picture quality of a S-VHS recording is Head and Shoulders above a Standard VHS recording! Ultimately we the consumer decide any particular video or audio format’s fate. We buy it, it lives! We don’t, it dies! I don’t know, I guess the higher prices of S-VHS VCR’s contributed to it’s demise, but I have always been one willing to pay a little extra for quality, but I guess a lot of people aren't. That said, let’s get on with the review... |