Bose Wave radio CD Mini Systems
Bose Wave radio CD Mini Systems
[Aug 15, 2001]
Troy
Casual Listener
Strength:
Size, appearance, ease of use
Weakness:
none, it does exactly what it is supposed to Some "interesting" reviews on this product, so here is my two cents. I bought this to have a nice stereo in the living room that the whole family could listen to, and it does a great job! I don't need a stereo that is a piece of furniture, but wanted one that is quick and easy to use and has great sound and the Wave fits the bill perfectly. Some day I will probably want a full blown system like I had when I was a teen, but for now I can have this in my living room in a spot where kids won't get at it and it doesn't take up any living space. |
[May 04, 2001]
mike
Audiophile
Strength:
Best sound clock radio I have ever heard.
Weakness:
Retail price outragous for what it really is. After a song and dance story about how He needed some money, I gave in and offered my friend 50 bucks for the wave radio. He wanted 200, but I talked him down after a few beers. I mostly use this product in the kitchen when I am getting ready for work in the morning. The sound quality is about on par with a GPX mini system or an clock radio from walmart. It doen't botther me that the sound is not the greatest, I only use it to listen to the news. I would not ever pay the retail price, as you could assemble a stereo for about 500 dollars that would beat this tiny system. Hey want do you expect, it is a Bose Product? Bose sells because it is well known and percived to be the end all be all of audio. This could not be further from the truth, but hey More power to them if they can sell a 450 dollar clock radio and people buy it.... Similar Products Used: GE clock radio, Sony boombox w/cd |
[Feb 04, 2001]
Sam Sundaram
Casual Listener
Strength:
Somewhat attractive. It does it's job (a great alarm clock) and EVERYONE wants to touch it/hear it after they go "ohhh, it's a bose!"
Weakness:
The people are soon disappointed by the inferior sound. The looks get old and you suddenly realize that it's a very expensive clock radio Now, I'm not a Bose basher.. As a child of indian immigrants my family has always spent the extra penny for quality and luxury.. It's an odd problem associated with trying to prove your success.. So, while I claim to be a free thinker, I picked up this system because of Bose's claim of superiority.. The fact is that this is just an over priced status symbol that still works well though.. Works well, not sounds well.. If I was doing a review of clock radios and price was not an issue, I would rate this system a 10 out of 10. It's attractive (for a clock radio), sounds good (for a clock radio), and plays cds.. But as a minisytem this system fails miserably. The bass is too thumpy, their is distortion at higher levels AND it's not that attractive compared to other minisystems. I have a Denon DM5 that has an awesome FM tuner, 3 cd changer and great mission speakers that cost me 300 bucks that's insanely better than this system.. If it's too big for you, pick up the $169 (!!!!!!) panasonic pm03. It MUCH more attractive than the bose, sounds better (though the bass is a bit too punchy) and works GREAT as an alarm/clock radio. I picked up a pm01 for 140 bucks on clearance and everyone thinks it cost me 4 timest that price (it looks a little like my wonderful dm3 by denon). Similar Products Used: panasonicSA-PM01/PM03 |
[Mar 19, 1999]
Dennis
an Audio Enthusiast
Let me start with the negatives so that you'll hopefully take the positives a little more seriously. First, all Bose products are way overpriced. They can do that, though, because they have little to no competition. At one time, I seriously considered a Bose Acoustimass home theater system. In addition to small, inobtrusive speakers, it had a small, inobtrusive system unit. The sound was okay - liveable if not good. But the sound really can't be compared to anything else, because there isn't (or wasn't !) anything similar. I wouldn't be surprised if the Yamaha AV-1 is as good for a fraction of the price, but I never checked it out because I convinced myself that components are the only way to go. I couldn't see spending $3000 for a HT system that can't do Dolby digital - or that can't supply power to a 2cnd set of speakers (you need powered speakers) ! So I stuck with components. As for speakers, I still thought about Bose, then starting looking at better sounding, though bigger, alternatives, like the Energy Take 5's or the Definitive Pro Cinemas. I finally ordered a set of Gallo Micros. I'll post a review in the Gallo Micro section soon. |
[Jul 22, 1999]
Brian
an Audio Enthusiast
Stop yelling.Or did your caps button get stuck.What planet are you from.I`m an above average audiophile with equipment valued over $14.000 and I used to be a Bose owner.I`ve owned the 901`s and I use to think they were awesome until I heard a pair of Dalquist DQ-10`s with their powered sub.Since then I learned to audition as many as I could before unloading alot of money.Most people I know who own Bose bought them because of their reputation from other rookie wanabee audiophiles.I have had them sit down in my recreation room and hear what GOOD SPEAKERS ARE SUPPOSED TO SOUND LIKE.Most Bose owners are NOT aware of GOOD stereo outlets.Best Buy,Circuit City,Sears ect. are the only place they know of.Cheap plastic enclosers,cheap plastic speaker clips,cheap paper cone woofers ARE NOT MY IDEA OF A GOOD SPEAKER. |
[Jul 22, 1999]
Len Katz
an Audiophile
if poster bobbylen is a PHD, then I must be Superman. He does not write to the capacity of a PHD, nor does he express himself like one. He also does not obviously think like one. He is more than likely a Bose saleseman or employee who is putting up an obviously hokey [typical of Bose lovers] post. Dr Amar Bose is a mathematician and a marketer. He knows how to make a fancy looking consumer product, with parlor trickery to lure in the weak minded and inexperianced. |
[Jul 20, 1999]
Joseph Young
an Audio Enthusiast
Expensive, but it does give sound stage and is relatively detailed. If you primarily listen to classical music and don't have enough space for big stereo system, it is a good choice. If you listen to pop music only, I think every cheap boom box will do reasonable jobs for you. |
[Jul 20, 1999]
John Nesmith
an Audio Enthusiast
No, I feel if you have ears that function, there are much better buys than $499 for a plastic, cheap clock radio with a cd player. I listen to all forms, and they all sound bad on Bose products. Teac, Technics, and the like make $499 systems that can be mated with REAL speakers. If I don't have much room, that same space that occupies that Bose junk would accomadate a decent mini system. |
[Jul 19, 1999]
ehlava
an Audio Enthusiast
The price is way out of line, but the sound is not too bad for such a small unit. I have heard component systems of the monster truck crowd variety that sound much worse than this. If money is no object and space and simplicity is a consideration, it is worth a look. |
[Jul 19, 1999]
Bruce Mahew
an Audio Enthusiast
What, I ask you justifies the price of this when a clock radio, or MINI system with MUCH better sound costs less? For $499 you can get a whole mini system with a full plethora of components. Or for $149, a boom box with the SAME features. For the outrageous "More money than brains" pricing scheme: 1 STAR!!! |