Monster Cable Reference PowerCenter HTS3500 Power Conditioners
Monster Cable Reference PowerCenter HTS3500 Power Conditioners
[Aug 25, 2002]
glassfan
AudioPhile
Strength:
Plenty of AC outlets
Weakness:
Shoddy build quality- off switch quit working, meter lamp quit working Shoddy build quality, questionable benefit to system performance. Doesn't seem to help cable TV picture. System doesn't sound any better. Not sure if meter is accurate at all. Will upgrade soon to a non-Monster product. Monster spends their money on advertising. Similar Products Used: Adcom ACE-515 |
[Mar 04, 2000]
Charles Nordlander
Audiophile
Strength:
Amazing difference in my cable TV picture.
Weakness:
It just sounds awful, like taking a vacuum to your system and sucking the life from it. I'm sad to report that the 3500 is, without question, the most disappointing audio product I've ever purchased. I was looking to replace my very old Adcom 180, and read Robert Harley's rave review of Monster's 2000 power conditioner in The Absolute Sound. I was most impressed by the fact that Richard Marsh was the "hired gun" designing Monster's power products, since he is arguably the top engineer in this field. And, after reading that he had designed an amazing power conditioner selling for $200 (if I remember correctly, Harley claimed Monster's 2000 model offered 85% of the performance of his $3,000 line conditioner!), I couldn't wait to hear what Marsh could cook up for $400. Similar Products Used: Adcom 180 |
[Mar 15, 2000]
Brian
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Holds black very well. Cleaned up cable ghosting. Sound less bright.
Weakness:
Can't turn gauge light off, only dim it down. I've had this unit for about a month and it has been a good purchase. I noticed immediately that the colors were more saturated and that black was very black. I ran Video Essentials again to adjust the display and now it looks great. My cable no longer ghosts like it used to, which is a godsend for some of my frequently watched channels. I noticed a slightly quieter sound overall, I'm not sure if that is the drop in power like the previous reviewer experienced. I guess if I had his system, I wouldn't be putting a $400 power piece in my rack. It would look cheap in comparison to my other stuff. The reason I went with the 3500 was the rack mount ability and the power gauge. If I had it to do over, I would go with the 2500. The 2000 may be good, but it's not a rack piece. One annoying fact is that you can't turn the power gauge light off. You can only dim it. Why is beyond me. |
[Dec 02, 1999]
Bruce
Audiophile
Strength:
More natural, life-like sound with a reduced digital edge.
Weakness:
In my system improvments were easy to discern but faults were not readily noticeable. The Monster PLC has done all that I could have expected. Yes, I would like a more refined, natural sound but that will require better components or the MG 1.6's. I read a favorable review about the Monster HTS 2000 Power Line Conditioner and decided an in-home audition was in order! However, I decided on the more expensive ($400) HTS 3500 model because of it's rack component design (unlike the HTS 2000 which is a oversized power strip) and the added circuit to filter digital sources. I expected to hear marginal differences that required a careful A/B comparision. However, the improvements were immediate and obvious. Clearer, more defined bass. More natural vocals with a life-like presence. And clearer highs but with less of a digial edge. In my modest system (12 year old Magnapan speakers, Rotel separates, and a new Linn CD player) everything sounded more musical and listenable. Less hifi and more like real music, you could say. My initial reaction was so good, I listed with the PLC for 3 hours before the first A/B comparision. That may be a first! My system never sounded so good. Similar Products Used: None. |
[Apr 04, 2000]
Andy
Audiophile
Strength:
cheap, more than enough inputs
Weakness:
takes too much away from the music i bought this unit, expecting it to be the most incredible thing since sliced bread. boy was i wrong. it took away a lot from the sound, especially in the high end. the unit itself made a loud buzzing noise, and the LED's were redicuously bright. i actually switched back to a 10 dollar surge protector. but if you don't care about any of the things i have listed, than go for it, maybe it will work out for you. Similar Products Used: power pack II, and generic surge protector |
[Jan 28, 2000]
Mike
Audiophile
Strength:
Looks cool, has a lot of plug in's. Can be rack mounted. Remote turn on.
Weakness:
To many digital pulgs in comparison to other outlets. No dedicated VCR imput. Needs programble turn on/off. Well, I spent all of this money on my new system, spent even more on good interconnects. I was told that this is a MUST HAVE componet. However it is a retelitivly expensive one $400. So I went out to Good Guys and got one. What I had on hooked up was a big computer battery backup. (if I loose power I can still watch my move or finish my cd listning. This unit was $200 cheeper then the monster power. Similar Products Used: None/ except for a APC ups |
[May 05, 2000]
Sam
Audiophile
Strength:
Allowed me to discover HTS 2000, which is great for audio
Weakness:
softens sound, removes detail from audio I must report my additional experience with Monster power Similar Products Used: Monster HTS 2000 |
[Aug 25, 1999]
Dan Cohn
an Audio Enthusiast
The 3500 cleaned up a persistent hum that was added to my system when a sunfire cinema grand amp was added. Things are sounding overall extremely good, but this is a very difficult component to A/B test. My meter is accurate, and I experience no noise from the meter as the previous poster did. I'd also like to point out that fewer components/smaller circuit board is not a valid way to judge any device. For me, it sounds good, it looks good, and I'm quite pleased. |
[Jul 26, 2000]
Andrei
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Too many to count
Weakness:
None that I could find This is the most economical cost/performance model of all HTS grades. I tried them all. It simply improved the video and audio quality as if i am in a different world. |
[Nov 28, 2000]
Erik Cabral
Audiophile
Strength:
Good price and warranty.
Weakness:
none yet. I was experiencing the "electric chair" effect (dimming of my lights) and some short outs when running an electric heater with my a/v equipment. So I ran out and picked this up and I'm pretty happy knowing that my $12k plus investment is protected. The built in meter is a good gauge to see exactly the flux and inconsistency from the incoming current. Plenty of options for equipment plug-ins. Except there isn'te a specific outlet for the sub. Which is dissappointing. I ended up pluging into the "pre-amp" outlet. All in all it's comforting to know that everything is protected with the $100k warranty. Similar Products Used: plain jane surge protectors and computer battery backups. |