NAD C422 Tuners
NAD C422 Tuners
USER REVIEWS
[Nov 28, 2023]
Sandman1221
Strength:
I got this 2004 NAD C422 Stereo Tuner in 2023 off of Ebay, it replaces a 1978 Kenwood KT-7500 analogue Stereo Tuner. The Kenwood sounds great, except for background noise/static sometimes constant other times intermittent, and very little stereo separation on some slightly weaker stations, but a station that pegged the Signal Meter had speaker to speaker stereo separation. This NAD C422 has great stereo separation on most stations, some 30 miles away in flat Florida with a Stellar Labs omnidirectional antenna mounted in attic. The sound is great too when paired with a 1998 NAD Stereo Integrated Amplifier 317, and the 317's remote works on the C422! I did not need to use the Blend filter most of the to get rid of static/background noise and stereo separation was much better without it. For one station I sometimes do need to use Blend, so have a second preset for the same station with Blend ON, easy to switch between station presets from armchair. The Signal Meter (7-bars) defaults to 7-bars when no station is tuned in, once a station is tuned in the meter kicks in. CD quality sound including stereo separation when not using Blend. Weakness:
Only minor issue is IR sensor on C422 front panel has very limited angle, but good range, need to point the 450 remote from NAD 317 amp. fairly precisely, less so with 317, and miss spinning the heavy silver tuning knob on the Kenwood tuner!, but after making presets, do not need to touch the C422 electronic tuning knob anymore. Remote works power switch for C 422 as well as AM/FM and presets. Oh, and very sensitive to interference from a Samsung smart phone 5' away with 4G/LTE on, will dramatically increase background noise. Price Paid: $79 + $35 shipping
Purchased: Used
Model Year: 2004
|
[Aug 14, 2023]
tomadam23
Strength:
With ample space to accommodate multiple people, this tent fosters camaraderie and comfort, ensuring that your group's bonding experience continues even after the engines are turned off. https://tentsdaily.com/best-family-tents-for-bad-weather/ Weakness:
If you're riding with a group of fellow adventurers, the Expedition Group Cruiser Tent is a must-have Purchased: New
|
[Jan 13, 2007]
MLH
AudioPhile
Strength:
Pulls in stations very well (disclaimer: I am comparing to mid-fi receivers)
Weakness:
No supplied remote but works very well with NAD remote
This tuner is being used along with an NAD C325BEE in my smaller home office system and my comments would pertain more to its functions rather than a critical assessment of its sound quality (which overall is very good for FM in this local). First, it does not come with a remote and so it is very beneficial to have an NAD amp with its supplied remote. My C325BEE SR-5 remote works perfectly with this tuner and the power on button will power up both units simultaneously without the need of a 12V trigger wire. The power off button on the remote will put the tuner (and amp) into standby mode but oddly this is the only way to enter standby; the faceplate button serves more as a master power switch that shuts the tuner down completely, making it unresposive to remote inputs. For the remote in general, a third party programmable device would be another option of course.
Similar Products Used: B&O 5000 series tuner and mid-fi receivers |
[Sep 09, 2004]
erodrigu75
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Loosks like a NAD, i like that! Sound as good as a NAD. Almost noise free radio listening.
Weakness:
No AM step setup. Remote sensor angle is not more than 100°, needs the use of NAD Link. This tuner is a very good choice, if you want to listen radio without noise. All of the radio stations i was listening radio with my previous 5.1 receiver and sound get with noise and distortion, but the stuff changes with this little wonder. it sounds natural, warm... simply nad. Similar Products Used: technics, pioneer, aiwa, panasonic |