Sonic Blue Rio PMP300 MP3 Players
Sonic Blue Rio PMP300 MP3 Players
[Jul 10, 1999]
Lewis
an Audio Enthusiast
I just picked up a Rio last week and I love it. I can't think of a better product for listening to music either on a train or (and I like this the best) while working out, because there's great sound quality, the thing is tiny, light and it doesn't skip. |
[Jul 09, 1999]
Rick Wills
an Audio Enthusiast
There are a lot of misconceptions about the RIO |
[Aug 03, 1999]
Jacob
an Audio Enthusiast
Just a comment on the lack of Bass from the mp3 format in general. For those that don't know, mp3 is a form of compression. In order to fit sound files in about 1/10 of the space digital audio on a cd takes up, certain things have to be removed. This includes frequencies most people can't hear and other sounds that are masked (which again most people can't hear). This is why the majority of the world's population hears no difference between a 128kbps 44khz mp3 (or even 112kbps) and a cd. I can't speak for the Rio's amp, but those people who complain the format in general lacks bass, check your soundcard (on a pc) or find a different encoder. MP3 is just a format, there are different encoders, and some are better than others. As for the Rio, 32 megs is just not enough memory, but as a first generation product, it's pretty good. |
[Sep 08, 1999]
Rob
an Audio Enthusiast
"Charles an Audio Enthusiast from Cambridge MA writes: |
[Sep 30, 1999]
Randy M.
an Audio Enthusiast
Iam looking to get the new rio500 to mainly create Mp3's from TV and movie sound tracks and upload them to the rio. Iam expecting to get up to the 32 hours of storage out of it since I will be using mostly voice audio only. Anyone else uploaded voice only mp3's? And do you get more record time that way? |
[May 18, 1999]
I got the rio about 1 month or two ago, and I have to say that it's kind nice, but not worth the money. If it either cost half as much or had twice the memory, it'd be good. You can really only fit about 30-40 minutes of quality mp3's on it, which means you have to copy new mp3's to it al the time. |
[May 24, 1999]
Zildjean
an Audio Enthusiast
I saw this when it came out and figured $199.99 was a bit pricey. Well, I'm glad I waited, I just bought it at $129.99, with a $50.00 rebate. I'm very happy with it; I bought it because rollerblading with any disc player means plenty of skips. |
[May 13, 1999]
Kev
an Audio Enthusiast
I own a Rio and am extremely happy with it. I have it hooked up to a reciever that gives 40-watts to the speakers I have attached to it and it rocks better than anything else. People also need to relize that this thing is the first portable mp3 player and they will get loads better. I am also intrigued by the car mp3 player. It goes in your dash like another radio, it has a couple gig of space and is supposed to rock. I'm sure that everybody has already guessed that it woulndn't be cheap. $1000-$3000 is what i've heard. |
[May 10, 1999]
dan
a Casual Listener
Hi!I just want to say that the Rio player RULES, why? Because: |
[Jul 04, 2001]
Peter
Audiophile
Strength:
No skipping, Loooooooong battery life, good sound qaulity at 128 kbs. Tiny.
Weakness:
little bass. skips with normal batteries. While this is a little old it is still good. I use it mainly when i mow the lawn. BUt the battery compartment was mad to use with a Duracell Ultra, which is slightly bigger then other batteries. Just stuff a little piece of foil in the battery thingie. Nice and tiny. If you press on the headphones that came with it, it sounds like a concert in your head. Which is cool.But it hurts your ears. |