B&W CDM 1 Bookshelf Speakers
B&W CDM 1 Bookshelf Speakers
[Feb 23, 1999]
Jancok
a Casual Listener
Never listen to speakers that so amazing like them before. The vokal is so pure and the tweeter is so clear. I had NHT superone before, after listening the CDM-1, I just traded them to the shop...............Compare with the price...the sound that I listen to is more EXPENSIVE |
[Jun 03, 1997]
Arthur van der Zijden
The cdm1 are the best surround speakers for AC-3 (rear large)in combination with the 801 matrix and the HTM centre. |
[Jun 20, 1997]
Ben Pearre
an Audio Enthusiast
I had a couple of chances to listen to these in stores. My impression is just that they are dark speakers, with a moderate bass-boom problem. They were well out from the wall, being run with compatibly-priced equipment in both cases. For their size, they get a great deal of bass, but it is uncontrolled and too loud. Don't expect airiness or crispness out of them. They are fairly pleasant-sounding apart from that, but I think that for the price, if you're not looking for lots of bass, you can do much better. Just for your reference, my dream speakers are really big Magepans :) |
[Sep 13, 1998]
Amy
a Casual Listener
One of the best speakers I have ever heard! They look nice too! |
[Jan 03, 2000]
Ben Franquiz
Audiophile
Strength:
Very natural and smooth sound
Weakness:
Limited bass extension I bought my pair 8 months ago for $700.00 used, the best $700 I have ever spent. The speaker is very warm and natural sounding. I think it gives the music depth and it sounds so smooth. The only drawback is it does not have exceptional bass extension, however it is a wonderful little speaker with a exceptional build quality. A great deal at $1,100 a steal if you find a nice used pair for around $700. A 4.5 rating would be fair but you cannot do that so I will give it a 5 because it is definitly deserves more than a 4. Similar Products Used: B&W DM 602 |
[Mar 05, 1999]
Siegfried
an Audio Enthusiast
I have read all the reviews with great interest. I am also the proud owner of the CDM1SE. Had them for 6 months - they are run in. They are wonderful and I like the detail they reproduce. I think the electronics driving mine is not bad, being AudioLab 8000S, 8000P and the Marantz 63 Signature. I enjoy listening late at night and the music I listen to is classical and blues. I am also the proud owner of Paradigm Monitor 7 speakers and here is the catch. Every time I place the Monitors 7's in place, I immediately loose 25% detail, but can they sing. Sometimes I think the boxes are working harder in making music than the actual speakers themselves. When I place the CDM's in place, I again enjoy their detail and accurate presentation. Maybe that is why you get Audiophiles and Audio Enthusiasts ? |
[Feb 08, 1999]
Steve
a Casual Listener
Oh the choices! I recently auditioned the CDM 1 SE and am comparing it to the NHT 1.5s, which are nearly half the price. Goal is to use these eventually as fronts for home theater with a sub, so bass isn't driving this decision. The CDM's have the edge - but not by much (better imaging and soundstage), but the NHT's have crisper highs. Quite frankly, the CDM 2's appear to be the better buy but as a rear ported speaker you need to be careful about placement. Looking for recommendations. By the way, Uncle's doesn't sell B&W's anymore and you can find NHT's at Netmarket for under 500. |
[Dec 13, 2000]
kostas
Audio Enthusiast
3 years ago I bought these speakers along with an audiolab 8000s and a marantz cd63-kis player and I could say with confidence that I was impressed by the result. These speakers are used in a space of around 40 square meters and even that the space is relatively big for a pair of 120watt speakers driven by a 60 watt amp, the result is great. At first audition, I was a bit dissapointed by the bass but as I then found out this was my fault since I had placed them in a corner too close to the wall. After putting them in a pair of Atacama SE 24 filled with sand and a bit furrther from the wall, the result was much much better but again not peerfect. Last move was to use the sponges provided to seal the bass reflex hole and that was it. Bass is clearer than ever and you can sit at a distance and enjoy whatever kind of music you like. Bass is perfect and the tweeters are capable of producing an amazing result and always clear. I have never reached the limit of these speakers with my amp so I am not capable of saying how far they can go but they are perfect for the space. A small disadvantage that might be my fault as well is that I have changed the tweeter of my left speaker twice until now. First time the tweeter coil was cut, I decided to replace it myself so I just got a new one and I did not add any coolant fluid that was in the original, so that might be the reason for burnng it again. |
[Dec 07, 1996]
Jimin Sun (Jimi)
an Audiophile
A pair of speakers that deserves to be called “Beauty.” |
[Mar 30, 1999]
David
an Audio Enthusiast
Listened to these using CD Audio, Laserdisc DTS Jurrasic Park 2, The 5th Element and a few other movies. I basically thought they sounded superb. I compared them to Monitors, Tannoys, Energys, and Paradigms. Its a real hard choice when these speakers are just a couple hundred more them the above competitors but perform so well. Personally I see it as follows:Monitors - Didn't spend much time here. I'm sure there good just wasn't real interested. |