B&W Nautilus 805 Bookshelf Speakers
B&W Nautilus 805 Bookshelf Speakers
[Mar 30, 2000]
James
Audiophile
Strength:
Possibly the highest quality speaker in its' price range. Detailed sound, wide soundstage, incredible imaging. Dramatic appearance and high end build quality.
Weakness:
Long break-in period. Careful placement is required for optimum sound quality. The Nautilus 805s offer an excellent combination of high end sound, build quality, and dramatic cosmetics. Their resolving power make careful system matching a must. It's important to be very careful with system matching as the 805s are capable of showing any weaknesses in the system. When auditioning these speakers, it's important to make sure that careful attention has been paid to set-up and that the speakers have had a break-in period or you will not be hearing their stunning capabilities. Similar Products Used: Paradigm Active/20, Revel M20 |
[Mar 12, 2000]
csm
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Soundstage, clarity
Weakness:
Picky, picky I won't get into the morass about how good these sound compared to all others; I haven't heard all others. Similar Products Used: Totem Mani-2, Celestion 100, Magnapan MG1 |
[Mar 07, 2000]
Mark
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clean crisp sound for music and movies. Very solid bass for a bookshelf. Great allround speaker.
Weakness:
Needs good electronics. If you skimp on your amp and preamp don't bother with these speakers. If the wife factor demands bookshelves you should check these out. They will require break-in. Mine took about three months of casual use. Once broken in you will not be sorry about your purchase. You will also need a good subwoofer if you like movies and for 5.1 surround. |
[Jan 14, 2000]
Dean
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
True to the music, with excellent detail.
Weakness:
Unfortunately, they make me want to replace the rest of my components. What can I say. I went into my local shop looking for the DM 601 S2's and came home with these babies at almost 5 times the price. It was love. So much high end detail, such smooth, punchy bass. Like so many other reviewers have mentioned, I'm getting a real kick out of pulling some of my seldom heard CD's off the rack and giving them a new listen. What a difference! My old favorites really shine too. Some of the bright recordings are painful, but I've heard those CD's sound bright on most other high-end setups too. |
[Mar 25, 1999]
Tony
an Audio Enthusiast
For the last couple of months I've been auditioning several speakers (NHT 1.5, 2.5i, 2.9, Martin Logan Aerius Speakers, Klipsch, Vienna Acoustics) just to name a few but of all these speakers I like to 805N's the best. After all my research I can truly say that know of these speakers are bad, they are all good but as always it comes down to what you want out of a speaker and as a jazz listener I felt that the 805's did the best job. |
[Oct 27, 2000]
William
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Imaging and Soundstage
Weakness:
Bass extension I've had these for about 6 months now. Wanted to make sure they were fully broken in before posting a review. First off, these do take a bit of time to break in. Be patient. I think this is probably the biggest reason why some people give this speaker an unfavorable review. It is a world of a difference once fully broken in. Was amazed by the difference. |
[Aug 19, 2001]
Taylor
Audiophile
Strength:
Great performance at this price. Every field is achieved excellently while still not the best.
Weakness:
In absolute metre, shading, resolution, cleanness, coherence, continuousness, & musicality are not the best I have heard from different speakers. In order to maxmize the performance of your B&W N805, you need to do 3 things. Similar Products Used: Duntech Sovereign, Swan, Eminent tech LFT-11, Stax Lambda Signature, Apogee minor Centaus, Reference 3A MM De Capo, B&W Nautilus 804, Infinity IRS V, Infinity Prelude MTS, TDL The Studio Monitor, Verity Parisfal Encore, ProAc Studio 100, JMlabs, Wilson CUB, Wilson CUB 2, Martin Logan, Alon Lotus Signature. |
[Jul 20, 2000]
Glenn Strauss
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Appearance, build quality, soundstage, high frequency neutrality
Weakness:
Will not play loudly when used full-range; small drop in mid-treble causes slight sweetening of sound I bought these after deciding that my Von Schweikert VR-4's were too big for my #2 listening room. I bought them because of their size, previous positive experience with B&W 801 Series 2's, and the striking appearance of speaker and stand. |
[Jan 06, 2001]
Rudy
Audiophile
Strength:
Mids and High, Fantastic design.
Weakness:
Some CD sounded good on my old speakers, but the 805's have showed me that some CD recordings are really bad(especially in mid and high frequency range. But that's the price you pay for having such quality speakers. I use the 805's with the bw cdm1 stand, I did't like the looks and price of original N805-stand. Similar Products Used: None |
[Apr 01, 2001]
David
Audiophile
Just an update and a reply to earlier reviews of this speaker. Most complained of the lack of "air", a feeling of thinness, and lack bass extention for these speakers. First, this speaker will tell of any qualities down the line with amps, preamps, and transports. This is why the 805's sound soooo sweet and warm, and lovely, with high quality components. And in my book makes them welcome in a very eliet group of speakers. This is also why it can sound as it has been above, because your amps or other components lack the reproduction fidelity you think. Other speakers may sound better but only because they cover-up (add to) the sound of your second-rate components. Audiophiles call this "sonic signature". The speakers (805's) sound like they do with an adcom amp because the adcom amp is dry, and lacks fine resolving power, and not because of the speakers. If your Adcom amps sounds good it is only because the speakers are contributiong much of themselves to the sound. Overall, this is not deseriable. |