Bose 301 Bookshelf Speakers
Bose 301 Bookshelf Speakers
[Apr 14, 2010]
Bert
Audio Enthusiast
I bought my pair of bose 301´s back in 1976 together with a HK 330B and a Thoréns record player.
|
[Dec 21, 2009]
beaumoa
Audio Enthusiast
Ahhhh the much maligned Bose 301 speakers, I can honestly say that I have always been happy with mine. I purchased my first set in late 1978 they had just been released and after hearing them fell in love with them and their warm all rounded sound. many people say they are crap and not worth the $$$ but I've had many other speakers over the years and while some may have been technically superior none could match the listening quality of the 301's. I had mine until 2004 36 years and they were still sounding great. Unfortunately a lowlife decided he needed them more than i did and so I now have another set of 301's newer but still sounding great. I believe that the stereo needs to match the speakers and I purchased mine in 1978 so I at least have a quality built system. Ther must be something right about the set up as all my kids are arguing over who gets the system when i pass on |
[Dec 18, 2009]
Tyrone McGillicutyy
AudioPhile
I can do nothing but jerk off and splatter goo all over the walls every time I hear these speakers!
|
[Dec 16, 2009]
robbiefest
Audio Enthusiast
I've live with the same pair of bose 301 series 1 since 1980.I have replaced the bass drivers once and they are still going strong. For 9 years I worked for Bang & Olufsen, have a sound degree for the film industry, and am a musician. I believe I know music when I hear it.
|
[May 14, 2009]
TheRambler
AudioPhile
This is hard to describe product! As a long term audition addictive, thes small, poor-looking speakers shocked me in many respects. All negative comments to do with mis-placing or some other technical reasons within your system. To improve performance of those Jewel 301s try followings ;
|
[Jun 26, 2008]
wallace Karbe
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Warm easy sound. Natural sounding
Weakness:
Poor Poor construction - more solid MDF cabinets would be wellcome. I cannot for the life of me understand why it's become a national passtime to roast these speakers. In this site, folks talk of old technologytweeters, cheap electronics and poor stereo imaging.
Similar Products Used: Castle, AR, PSB |
[Dec 25, 2007]
tawaa
AudioPhile
Strength:
Good all rounders. Can take plenty of punishment. Controlled lows, no over bright highs. Compact
Weakness:
Poor stereo image. Not sure about the rear tweeter thing. Paper cone looks like poo. These Speakers have always impressed me for what they are. I bought them as monitors when i was living in a flat in Sydney studying Audio Enginerneering. I used them to do my home work on and they served me well! They hosted many a party too and done the job perfectly, took some abuse from my 2x 85wRMS Denon amp. I now have Mackie 824 monitors to do my work with but i still listen to any production after its mixed down to get an idea of what the rest of the world will be hearing. I've read plenty of bad stuff about bose but i deffo rate these 301v's. I now use them as fronts for my 5.1 dvd sytem in the beadroom and they do equally great job. Customer Service never needed any. |
[Sep 03, 2007]
perfect pitch
AudioPhile
Strength:
Price (but I got mine on sale in a big way)
Weakness:
They're Bose - so you, like me, are likely to never give them a chance.
First off let me start by saying I NEVER purchase my A/V equipment at Best Buy. Second, let me say that I've been disaapointed in Bose for the past 20 yrs.
Similar Products Used: Definitive Technologies
|
[Jun 07, 2007]
JonBeGood2U
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great dispersion of sound
Weakness:
Port Noise and Muddy bass in current design I purchased the BOSE 301's V in aproximately 3 years ago to complete a 5.1 surround system using the previous Bose 301 model for surrounds. In spite of the salesma's insistance that the bass is improved in the latest version, I conclude otherwise. The 2 round ports of the newest 301's produces some port noise with a muddy sounding bass while the earlier version's sloted port produced clean sounding bass with no accoustic complications. The newest 301's does have greatly improved treble which they atttribute to the trageting lens over the front angled tweeter. I therefore see the latest 301's as not in total improved over the earlier model as much as anticipated. They do look great and good enough for my purposes. I like the natural sound that Bose is attempting to create and am glad that the tweeters are not piercing or so predominate as in alot of competitor's models. Customer Service Excellent Customer Seivice Similar Products Used: Bose 201's
|
[Oct 29, 2006]
voddy
Casual Listener
Strength:
8 inch woofers,other speakers added with bose
Weakness:
tweeters,they should of used high end tweeters.this design is 16ohm parrel wiring makes 8ohm.I dont know about speaker wiring ect,but this is how I heard they were made.I replaced some tweeters,they were vey cheap to buy. II like to start with why I dont like the design.reflective speakers.lets enter 4 601 bose series 111 floor standing speakers as an example.ive done this test.this equals to 16 tweeters 4 woofers. to me theres to much treble.I always use regular speakers with it.then it sounds fine.the same test can be done with bookshelf speakers,I think it would sound better less tweeters.people always want to hear my system,there not interested in hearing the bose,although half are.they want to hear all the speakers.all I did was use 7.1 pre amp out to 2 stereos.its A total pain,to many speakers.I wanted to try this set up to see how it would work.its fine no clipping.but I dont leave the other 2 amps on very long.it draws 2 much current.sorry I got off the subject.ps I wanted denons 10.1 amp.but its $6,000 this was cheaper. Similar Products Used: b&w,bose,onkyo7.1,cabridge soundworks.dacs,kyocera710,b910 amps. |