Dynaudio Contour 1.3 Bookshelf Speakers
Dynaudio Contour 1.3 Bookshelf Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Jun 04, 2015]
Peter
AudioPhile
Legendary speaker. Proud owner since 1993. Still in perfect shape. Throughout the years, I matched them with various components. They sounded always as good as the worst part of the audio chain supplied. Brilliant. Truly reference speakers. If you manage to find a pair, go for it. Currently, they are hooked up to Pass Aleph 3 with Audioquest speaker cables and Homegrown Audio DNA signal cables. I'm simply amazed how they deal with various genres of music. However, take my advice to make them sound outstandingly well:
|
[Jan 31, 2009]
ren9328
AudioPhile
Sorry to say that one reviewer thought these to have a "tubey" sound with non existent bass. I hope that others interested in these speakers did not stop investigating after that horrid review. (Maybe he tested them with a worn out Philco amp or something!)
|
[Oct 26, 2008]
dkzzzz
Casual Listener
Strength:
None, seriously absolutely none. This speaker is pathetic exercise in cabinet making(well,just like 90% of speakers).
Weakness:
Muddy lingering bass. No treble. Does not have any ability to reproduce accurate bass. Bass lingers too long covers everything that follows overlaps and creates nasty reverberations. Meanwhile treble does not exist, even with very efficient amp like Linn or Naim. To make a long story short this speaker is not suitable for listening to music or any sounds. It is incoherent and at best can be described as something deliberately made to sound "tubey".
Similar Products Used: Focal JM Labs, KLH Signature, ATC 20 passive, Ymaha studio momnitors, B&W |
[Mar 29, 1999]
Kevin
an Audio Enthusiast
Recently purchased the Contour 1.3 Mark II after much listening. These speakers, while mildly demanding of amplifiers, are the flattest in response terms that I've ever had the pleasure of witnessing (sans statics). If you listen at modest rather than light levels, these should be auditioned without fail. The $2,400 is a little steep though. My opinion is that they need 100w to bloom. 4 Stars = Nothing is perfect |
[May 01, 2000]
sirin
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clarity of voice, neutrality, wide dispersion
Weakness:
limited bass as expected but has plenty for most music and rooms just demoed the 1.3 with the audience 50 speakers. i used lower end components - $700 integrated amp - $500 cd player to emulate my home set up as closely as possible. |
[May 03, 1999]
dave
an Audio Enthusiast
This is a terrific speaker. It is highly accurate and images superbly. It is not efficient, but so what. A decent 100 watt solid state amplifier will only set you back $2000. You can even get 70 watt tube amps around this price range. The speaker's not cheap; but then near perfection isn't cheap either. Try buying a new Lexus for $12,000. |
[Aug 23, 1998]
Yee fung
an Audiophile
Unlike several reviewers, I have heard these speakers. They are incredibly revealing ad analytical. A reviewer would find great use for these speakers. Howeveer, these definitely are not speakers that I could live with long term. |
[Nov 29, 1999]
Ron
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great mid-range.Very smooth and natural.
Weakness:
Bass is somewhat bloated and slow sounding. I just solda pair of 1.3 mkII's.I really liked the natural sound and the high's and mid's are just right.Not to bright and just the right amount of detail.But, I was bothered by the slower sounding bass. I thought I could deal w/ it. Until I heard the Dyna 1.8's.And then I couldn't live w/ the 1.8's.I guess i'll never be satisfied. |
[Dec 25, 1997]
Joe Wessling
an Audio Enthusiast
I've had a pair of 1.3's for about 4 months now and love them to death. I use them in conjuction with a Levinson 39 player, Tara Labs Decade and Master wire and a Sunfire amp. They're extremely accurate and uncolored and have an amazing amount of bass for such small speakers. They sound particularly good with a REL subwoofer filling out those missing 20 or so hertz (my next purchase, i hope). I used to own B&W 805's, which are good speakers, but the mid-range of the Contours is impeccable and the highs are perfect and they're much more attractive looking (B&W's are really ugly - except the Silver Signatures). As a recording engineer and producer i must say that everything i take home from the studios sounds even better on the 1.3's, though they are not kind to poorly recorded material. (BTW, the next model up, the Contour 1.8 isn't that great -- don't be tempted by the extra bass performance unless you've got a BIG room to put them in.) |
[Dec 07, 1997]
Laurent Vanderlynden
an Audio Enthusiast
Contour 1.3 are fabulous speakers for the price. |