Acoustic Research AR1 Floorstanding Speakers
Acoustic Research AR1 Floorstanding Speakers
[Aug 02, 1999]
Bob Stack
an Audiophile
This is definitely a pair of speakers that far exceed the price. Midrange is excellent, while treble is high and crisp. Even before run-in, the speakers already show their potential, just that after a full break-in, it really shines. The low-end is taut enough, especially with the right partnering equipment, sounds extremely decent!!. By the way, transients is also excellent. When I saw these at www.cyberteria.com for $1509.90/pair I could'nt resist. |
[Nov 28, 1999]
Jethro
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Good value, Excellant bass and overall frequency response, Nice finish (cherry)
Weakness:
Very directional, Early woofer problems, could used an adjustable crossover Great value speakers, blows away many over $2K, Excellant bass and great for playing music very loud. Recommend using line outs directly to woofer amps and carefully adjusting the gain. Nice shape and easily fits into most rooms. Built in amps mean that you dont need a huge amount of power to drive these speakers well. This means that you can use tube amps for the upper end (I am using monoblocked Golden Tubes). I did notice that the speakers are highly directional on the high end. This is great if you are using them for home theater or have a set listening position. But if you are looking to fill the room with sound it will be more difficult (I'd suggest using surround sound setup or buying an optional after-market tweeter to offer a a broader high end dispersion pattern). This is not an ucommon problem with other speakers but this is what I noticed with these. I did manage to push them so hard that the woofer delaminated. It took about 3 weeks to get a new one from AR and they were somewhat cooperative (they dont like to support their products if you buy them online, some persuading is necassary). I shopped around quite a bit and looked at Infinity, Bose, NHT, Klipsch, B&W, totum, among many others and these are the best by far for the money. The cherry finish is nice. Similar Products Used: NHT 3.3 |
[Dec 17, 1999]
Steve
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Bass; efficiency; good overall sound.
Weakness:
Quality control? Service. Follow-up to my 6/24/99 review. That 'sizzly' high end I found at the outset turned into no output from the R speaker's tweeter. Calls to AR required more effort than expected to have them designate a Factory-authorized repair shop in the New York City area. The designated shop reported that they didn't do work for AR & it took a call from AR to convince them that they did. To my disapointment, the shop's techs had obviously never seen this model, nor its predecessor the 315 HO, and they had neither any manufacturer's literature on it, nor any inclination to do a meaningful diagnostic on it. Instead, they insisted on ordering 2 replacement tweeters, despite the fact that the L tweeter works just fine. Hmmmmmm. As it happens though, the L speaker needs work of another kind. In this regard, I echo Steven Rosburg's 7/1/99 criticism of the cheesy LF 30HZ potentiometer knobs on the speakers' rear panel. The left one literally detached/snapped off in my hand as I adjusted it. As such, this incredibly flimsy and overly-long circuit board-mounted stem has to be replaced and perhaps the board with it. I await, with trepidation, delivery & installation of the replacement parts by my local shop, who's techs will apparently be learning on the job. |
[Feb 24, 2000]
Jeff
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Price and SUB
Weakness:
can only buy online I have not bought these speakers yet but i am looking into it. YOu can buy the center channel for like $300 that goes with these. And you can also get these at netmarket.com for $1500. The problem is that i can not listen to them first so i doubt i will buy them. |
[Jan 17, 2001]
KEVIN LUONG
Casual Listener
Strength:
GOOD BASS, THIS SPEAKERS ARE SUITABLE HOME THEATER. NOT FOR 2 CHANELS STEREO LISTENING
Weakness:
LACK OF HIGH FREQUENCY. I AM VERY DISAPPOINT. I HAVE AN OLD PAIR OF AR 9. IT IS MUCH BETTER THAN THIS IN TERM OF HIGH FREQUENCY AND EVERYTHING. RECOTON IS THE PARENT OF AR. THEY DO NOT KNOW HOW TO ASSEMBLE SPEAKERS. ALL THEY DO IS MAKING AUDIO ACCESSORIES SUCH AS CABLE, TAPE HEAD CLEANER... I HAVE COMPLETE SET OF AR 9 FOR FRONT, AR 2C FOR CENTER AND AR 15 FOR REAR. TOTAL SPEAKERS COST $2300. OTHER EQUIPMENTS ARE DENON 5800 RECEIVER. DENON DCD3000 CD PLAYER, SONY 7700 DVD...ALL SPEAKER CABLES AND AUDIO INTERCONNECT ARE TOP OF THE LINE FROM MONSTER. SOUND SHOULD BE GOOD, BUT IT IS NOT WITH THESE AR'S. I AM VERY DISAPPOINT ON THE SOUND. TO FIX THIS PROBLEM,I AM THINKING IS ADD A GOOD PAIR OF TWETERS FROM JM-LAB/FOCAL. IT COST ABOUT 250 INCLUDING CROSSOVER. HELP IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER IDEAS. I CAN NOT REPLACE THESE SPEAKERS BECAUSE ALL FURNITURE CUSTOM MADE BASED ON THESE SPEAKERS DIMENSIONS. Similar Products Used: AR9, POLK-SRD-2A, BW 605 |
[Jan 17, 2001]
Bob
Audiophile
I have reviewed these speaker before. There are individuals posting negative comments multiple times that skews the total points this speaker deserves downward. I have been using these for over a year with a high powered separate amp, and top associated equipment, and the sound is flawless. See Stereophile, June 99. There are NO cheap parts in this speakers, and if you can blow a driver you are misusing your amplifier( driving it into overload or clipping). If it sounds bad it is somewhere else in your system. I am an audio elecronic engineer for many years and have used multiple speakers to evaluate equipment. These are among the very best. |
[Jun 08, 2000]
Donald Hess
Audiophile
Strength:
Good imagining and detail.
Weakness:
Built in 15" woofer limits placement. System Configuration: Similar Products Used: Tested: |
[Dec 15, 2000]
Josh C
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent sound reproduction, solid construction
Weakness:
No AR dealer near me Current Setup: Similar Products Used: none |
[Oct 23, 2000]
Travis
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Incredible bass response. Smooth and crisp highs.
Weakness:
Long warm up period. I've read a lot about the speaker, but I could not find the article in stereophile but knowing the personal history of Bob Carver and the craftsmanship of AR I decided to look into them. |
[May 09, 2000]
Armstrong Ting
Audiophile
Strength:
They are Acoustic Research, need I say more?
Weakness:
If you put bad music in, it will faithfully reveal it. Mr. Werner must not understand the principles behind getting good sound from one's speakers. It is crucial to match the right amp for a pair of speakers. In defense of Acoustic Research, who's been in the business of making quality loudspeakers before I was born, they've revolutionized the way music is reproduced with their acoustic suspension design for loudspeakers. In other words, they created closed port speaker systems which many other companies soon followed. And I highly doubt your understanding of audio engineering since you stated that you chose to use Krell of all amplifiers to drive your high efficiency 312 HO speakers. The 312 HO is a bass reflex design which uses an open port, which makes the speaker more efficient. You need a low powered tube amp to get the best sound from your 312 speakers. Save the Krell for power hungry closed port speakers which utilize acoustic suspension, like the top of the line AR1 which retails for $2500/pair. It's simple, open port means louder sound with less power. Closed port means cleaner, tighter bass, but requires more power. Many audiophiles choose the latter. |