B&W CDM 7SE Floorstanding Speakers
B&W CDM 7SE Floorstanding Speakers
[Aug 04, 1999]
e phillips
an Audio Enthusiast
I've been busily researching speakers and components before I dig in and shell out the big bucks for a serious audio system. I've collected business cards (and thus reccomendations) from just about every salesman in a forty mile radius and listened to a number of speakers, including NHT, B&W, Mission, Paradigm, AR, Definitive, and yes even Infinity and Polk. I am determined to get the best I can for my dollar. |
[Sep 05, 1999]
Ben
an Audio Enthusiast
I have been shopping new speakers for two years. I've listened to JMLab, Tannoy, ProAc, Martin Logan, Aerial, Linn, Genesis, "you name it," etc... After all this, I chose the B&W CDM1SE's because they simply had the BEST sound in terms of accuracy, clarity, soundstage, & sweetness of sound. I just traded my CDM1SE's for the CDM7SE's and unless something changes in the future...the CDM7SE's are better!! As for comparing the 7's to "BOSE"....that doesn't even warrant a response. |
[Sep 13, 1999]
Michael
an Audio Enthusiast
I recently bought these fine speakers in the red ash, and boy I am satisfied. I compared them to Jamo, Paradigm, Tannoy, Monitor Audio, and PSB. These were by far the most accurate in music reproduction. The highs and mids are clear but not too bright. The bass is okay, but a sub will take care of that. I am extremely happy with them. I got them and the CDMSE center for 2,400. |
[Sep 27, 1999]
Netles and Friends
an Audiophile
Re: Monitor 5These speakers are a joke. I compared them to a pair of B&W CDM 7SE which are a little bit more expensive (obviously better brand) of the Silver 5 and the CDM 7SE blew them away hands down. The highs are more detailed and smoother on the CDM 7SE. The midrange is so forward and 2 dimensional sounding on the Monitor 5 that Sade's voice sounded like she was in a box. I set her free once I switched over to the CDM 7SE. It is amazing how one company could make a product which not only looks better, but sounds superior. Don't waste your time with the Monitor 5 garbage cans, go out and audition the CDM 7SE. Those who make the comparison will see the light of day and realize just how bad the Monitor Silver 5 speakers really are. |
[Nov 15, 1999]
Alex
Audiophile
Strength:
Very accurate highs and mids.
Weakness:
Very unforgiving highs and mids, poor bass response. I have the complete CDM front array with a CDMCSE as center and the 7SE towers as mains. The sound from the towers is incredible. Albeit a bit weak in the bass department, but you can't ask for much with compact tower speakers. A good trade-off for size vs. deep bass response. I have the Sunfire True Sub MKII and it fills in nicely where the CDM7SEs fall off (at about 45Hz). Similar Products Used: B&W DM Series & Nautilus 804s. |
[Dec 18, 1999]
Jason
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Imaging, soundstage, clarity, smoothness, beauty!
Weakness:
Bass response I have had my speakers for 9 months and love them! I recently added a REL Storm III sub and they sound even better. I admit they are lacking in bass response for Dolby Digital but I was happy with them for music. The sub has only made them better. The sheer beauty ( I have red ash) of them won my wife over. I have the CDM CSE center to go with and they sound perfect, escpecially with the sub tuned in correctly. I highly recommend them! Similar Products Used: Klipsch, Thiel, Martin Logan, Jamo, Definitive Technology |
[Mar 02, 1999]
marl
an Audiophile
well in previous posts, i have always referred to myself as an audio enthusiast, but where do you draw the line between an enthusiast and an audiophile. im not really certain, but audio is a very important part of my life, ive been a musician for 16 years, been around studios and audiophiles for a majority of it, and i guess while i always considered myself an enthusiast, i guess with the amount of importance and time i spend and place on audio, im proclaiming myself a beginner audiophile :). |
[Aug 30, 1999]
Michael
an Audio Enthusiast
The 7SEs are fine speakers for those who want more OOMPHH than available in a bookshelf style speaker. |
[Feb 27, 2000]
Gary Lester
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Accurately reproduces the recording with plenty of detail. Attractive wood vaneer cabinet. Easy to drive.
Weakness:
The 6 1/2 in. bass driver lacks the ability to reproduce loud low bass, so if you wanna thump it looks like you'll need a sub to fill out the system. To keep a speaker at a certin price point, limitations in design are necessary. Obviousley, the cabinet construction is not on par with the more costly Matrix/Nautilus series,but it's about as good as any others I've seen in this range. Setup: Similar Products Used: Other floorstanders I listened to in this price range were Meadowlark Kestrel, Vienna Bach's, NHT 2.5i, PSB Stratus Silver, and Paradigm Studio 80. |
[Feb 26, 2000]
LINN
Audiophile
Matrix series drivers in a lousy cabinet with plenty of resonance. For nearly the same coin you could have previously got the Matrix 804s (before the series was discontinued) which are FAR superior. For all those that think the CDMs are so good, have a listen to a used pair of Matrix 804s if you can. The CDMs are designed to produce decent home theater sound with mass-market mid-fi stuff, but when you compare them to what was previously available from the Matrix series you really have to wonder how B&W could produce such a well groomed dog and sell it for nearly the same price. Hang your head in shame B&W, these speakers aren't worthy of your emblem! |