B&W Nautilus 804 Floorstanding Speakers
B&W Nautilus 804 Floorstanding Speakers
[Jun 14, 1999]
Chris Wynn
an Audiophile
Tremendous excitement attended my audition of B&W's new Nautilus 800 series. The salesman told me that the N804 was his favorite in the series, so I listened to it after auditioning the flagship model N801. I wondered how much of the larger model's weight and drama the N804 would retain. As it turns out, the N804s display none of their larger siblings abilities. |
[Jun 14, 1999]
Lee
an Audio Enthusiast
I've waited to post a review until I managed to listen to the majority of my cd collection and get through break in. But I've got to tell you that I fell in love with this speaker from day one. Previously I had cdm7se's with the cdmcse center channel. I waited until the n804's were available to make a decision on upgrading to the N803's or 804's from the cdmse series. I'm a little surpised at some of the reviews on this site of most of the nautilus series-especially the 801's- how anyone can give that speaker one star and say it lacks a detailed midrange is beyond me, but to each their own I suppose. |
[Jul 01, 1999]
Charles Crovo
an Audiophile
An open letter to Chris Wynn. Do you consider yourself an audiophile when you describe the quality of the recordings you listen to in detail when evaluating a loudspeaker? Most of us REAL audiophiles know the difference netween a bad recording and a bad speaker. I'm ashamed that you consider yourself an audiophile. REALLY ... MOTOWN??? As many audiophiles have realized, the Nautilus series requires a huge amount of break in time. After that they are incredibly detailed and musical. I have owned speakers from SNELL, VERITY AND REVEL in the past few years, and even though I do not own any Nautilus product, I can't sit by and let a so called audiophile who describes every last detail about the recordings he listens to yet doesn't have a clue dis' these speakers. I hope you folks will give a well broken in pair a listen and decide for yourself that Chris is an arrogant egotist that just wanted to get his name on the internet. All you have to do is read his review to know he is an extreme weanie. Why else would he write a bad review of an excellent product. I know, he can't hear! |
[Jul 02, 1999]
Peter
a Casual Listener
I got these demo speakers yesterday at $2900 plus tax and they are broken in from the store for 3 weeks. The sound is incredible in clarity and image. Lacking a little bit of bass, but they are perfect for my music (Classic and new age). I think they haven't got through the break in period yet, but the sound is terrific ,rich and accurate. Good product. |
[Jun 28, 1999]
Walter
an Audiophile
I own a pair of Nautilus 805,s but had to comment on the Nautilus series in general because of a review posted by Chris a couple spots back. This is not meant as a personal attack, but it is obvious that he heard a pair of N804,s that were either just out of the box or did not have much break in time. There is no question the speakers exhibit all of the qualities he described, but I have never heard a speaker that evolves nearly as much as any in the Nautilus series. Go back and listen to a broken in pair Chris, you'll surely agree that they are magical. |
[Jul 16, 1999]
Steven Towne
an Audio Enthusiast
I must revise my initial review on this newsgroup. I brought my own front end equipment to the same dealer some two months after hearing them previously. I attribute much of the calming down of them to break-in. On the previous visit the speakers were brand new. A word of advice let these break in a while. Anyway, same great midrange but a more laid back yet detailed treble response. Bass response seemed better also. A great speaker. |
[Jul 10, 1999]
Brian
an Audio Enthusiast
I don't know what qualifies one as an audiophile, so I won't presume to be one. However, I am a former musician, including both live and studio work, typically classical or jazz. These speakers are among the most accurate I've heard, and possibly the most accurate in their price range. Yes, they have a break in period, but that is a small inconvenience to pay for the quality of their sound. They are especially wonderful for anyone who wants to hear acoustic sounds reproduced accurately, no matter whether the music contains vocals or instrumentals. I easily give them five stars. |
[Jul 23, 1999]
Chris Wynn
an Audiophile
It was very courageous of Scott to post his review of the N804 after he had witnessed the kind of personal attacks that I got after telling the truth about these speakers. The N804 supporters (presumably people who have bought the speakers and definately some people who have never heard them) cannot challenge the truth about the N804's shortcomings, so they resort to bashing the messenger(s). |
[Jul 29, 1999]
Scott Smith
an Audio Enthusiast
I recently replaced my speakers and listened to about everything I could find in the $1500-3500 range. I ended up getting Vienna Acoustics' Mozart speakers which are $2500 (if you are looking in this range, my audioreview of the Mozart's includes comparisons with everything I tried). I thought these N804's were also quite good, #2 of the speakers I listened to. I am a bit puzzled by the bad reviews here. I agree they are too analytical, the highs popped out seemingly a bit "too good" (I don't know why it seemed that way but it did) and they are a bit on the harsh side. The bass is fine for me although they are placement sensitive (salesperson didn't place them right and I had to fix). Other than that, they were very impressive. Their accuracy is truly amazing and imaging also exceptional. I could put up with the problems because of the beautiful music they were making. They stood up extremely well at higher volumes. Other (stereophile high-rated) speakers I A/B'd them with sounded like pure crap. |
[Aug 05, 1999]
Mike Hanson
an Audiophile
I spent two hours listening to these at a shop here in Toronto. We used a combination of Proceed, Bryston and Rotel amplification. Sources were the Arcam Alpha 8SE and Rotel CD991. Overall, I wasn't really pleased with the speaker. The primary shortcomings were: |