Bose Acoustimass 5 Floorstanding Speakers
Bose Acoustimass 5 Floorstanding Speakers
[Dec 15, 2001]
????????????
Audiophile
Strength:
Clean Sound, Looks Nice
Weakness:
Where's the bass?, price This speaker system is very pricy. the sound is very clean coming from those small cubes. the only thing is the bass, i still don't hear it. Similar Products Used: polk, klipsh, sony |
[Dec 17, 2001]
Simon
Casual Listener
Strength:
Size, directional mounting, bright trebles, natural bass, directional sound reflection. Good for acoustic, Flamenco, pop.
Weakness:
Setting up - sensitive to position, mounting brackets are extra. Not so good for classical and heavy rock. With a NAD amp and Arcam CD.... Similar Products Used: Celestion |
[Dec 17, 2001]
carls steve
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
very clean sound.
Weakness:
not enough power for bass. This Speaker is good and i can enjoy music as i do in AR and JBL.The Clarity is much more better then jbl. Similar Products Used: AR and JBL |
[Dec 17, 2001]
Jeff S
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Good, clean sound, SIZE (duh)
Weakness:
Bass module is *very* position sensitive, OEM satilites don't really cut it This is an update to my review in January. I visited this review board yesterday, and really got to thinking about the sound of my system, so I really listened to where all the sound was. The 101's I replaced the OEM sats with are still great (and I don't care WHAT the Bose bashers say, at $110/pair new, these make GREAT sats for any 3 piece system) Similar Products Used: Bose 101 (used as sats for this system), 2.2 (surrounds), Yamaha 635's(center), old-assed Warfdales(gone) |
[Jan 20, 2002]
russ
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
size...wife acceptance factor
Weakness:
sound... these were originally purchased for my main speakers...as i became a better listener and sampled more and more speakers from other companies, i realized that i had made a mistake. i am not here to bash bose, but looking back i really feel that i paid way too much for the sound that i got from this speaker system. Similar Products Used: klh, boston, klipsch, advent |
[Jan 18, 2002]
Dan P
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
size, styling, ability to play quite loud
Weakness:
Not very accurate (especially in the shrill high end) I bought a pair of the original AM5's around 1995 when subsats were just becoming popular and admit I was hooked by the way the product was packaged, they were replacing huge old floorstanding BICS and seemed to sound too good for so small a package. I liked them at first but after a while began to notice lots of harshness in the upper end, the midrange is pretty good and the bass is better than most people seem to think although they seemingly peak around 80hz--very loudly, a trick it would seem to get the listener to think they extend farther than they do. There also seems to be a gap in the upper bass between the bass unit and satellites, noticeable on male voices (sometimes sound a bit hollow). Similar Products Used: NHT super zero |
[Jan 13, 2002]
Thom
Casual Listener
Strength:
Size.
Weakness:
Unbalanced. Has anyone else had a balance problem? I get more from the right than the left (it's not the receiver) The size is great (kids can't reach them), but I have a balance problem. I always get more out of the right channel, no matter what source I use. I have a brand new Sony 675 receiver, so it's not that. When I use the balance control on the receiver, I can balance them, but then it sounds muffled. Has anyone else had this problem? Similar Products Used: JBL Towers, Cerwin Vega Floor Standing |
[Jan 13, 2002]
Ron
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Sound quality
Weakness:
None Better sound through research. Similar Products Used: CSW |
[Jan 09, 2002]
Steve
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
They suck.
Weakness:
They suck. These are the suckiest speakers I ever heard. Because they suck. Similar Products Used: They suck. |
[Dec 23, 2001]
Kevin C.
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Size,size,size....did I mention size?
Weakness:
Sound and value. Simply put, the AM 5 is the most overpriced and under-performing(for the cost) speaker out on the market.Let's be honest, if Bose slashed the price of these things in half then it(along with the rest of the AM line) wouldn't receive as much abuse on this board.Case in point, I purchased my dbx Soundfield 3x2 sub/sat system from DAK in 1990 for $225 shipped. Shortly thereafter the folks at DAK performed a double blind test with over two hundred paticipants. The competitors were the dbx,Bose,CSW,Polk, and Yamaha sub/sat systems.The dbx blew away the field wih over 60% of the first place votes with the Yamaha system a distant second with 20%. Polk was third, CSW was fourth, and you guessed it...the Bose AM-5 was dead last. The ironic thing was the fact that the dbx was over $50% cheaper than the others(with Bose costing the most) and it sounded SO much better. Remember, the participants never knew which system they were listening to at any given time...they let their ears and minds decide. IMO, the AM-5 would receive much better treatment on this board if it retailed $250. Alas, we know that's never gonna happen so it will continue to get flogged. The Bose AM series deserves the heading of "buyer beware"....don't be duped by their relentless ads in the magazines. Similar Products Used: Aura LSW-828M's(three pairs),Aura LSB-627M's,Aura LSB-527M's(three pairs), and my old(but still great-sounding) dbx Soundfield 3x2 sub/sat system. |