Cambridge Soundworks Tower II Floorstanding Speakers
Cambridge Soundworks Tower II Floorstanding Speakers
[Jan 13, 2001]
Rich
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Without a doubt the finest speaker made for the money. This is yet another update to my previous 2 posts.
Weakness:
None. I simply must upgrade my previous 4 star ratings to 5 star. As I mentioned earlier, these speakers get SO much better with age. I have got to say that compared to the first few weeks I had them, they have now got be fully broken in. I can't imagin them getting any better. I will again restate that anyone who is not satisfied has got to get a new reciever/amp. These speakers demand high current. Before you sell or return these speakers and think about "upgrading" to yet another pair, save the $ and go buy an Onkyo TXDS575 A/V reciever. This reciever has had so many best buy and top quality reviews it is fantastic. You can throw away the other amps and equalizers that simply distort sound in my opinion and stick with simplicity. Great reciever, great speaker cable, and great speakers. That reciever will drive these speakers beyond what any sane human being would care to listen to, unless you want to advertise to the entire block that you are throwing one hell of a party. Pushing that reciever to the limit results in absolutely NO DISTORTION while the Tower II's are rated for al but the most powerful amps. I can't imagine feedng even even more than this reciever delivers. I swear the clarity, imaging, and range of these speakers simply gets better and better with age. Give them some time and drive them you will be totally amazed. Whatever you do, DO NOT SELL THEM BEFORE YOU TRY ANOTHER RECIEVER AND GIVE THEM ABOUT 6 MONTHS TO BREAK THEM IN FULLY. Similar Products Used: N/A |
[Oct 14, 2001]
Rich
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
HERE COMES MY REVIEW #4... AFTER A YEAR!
Weakness:
NONE I have got to again update my previous reviews of this speaker. Having started taking the hobby far more seriously and listening to numerous friend's systems costing two and three times as much, when they come over and listen to these CS Tower II's I still can not believe the looks on their faces. I don't know what it is with some of the people on this string who can bash these speakers. I am begining to think that every so often a set of speakers is produced that so exceeds their expectations that it is almost magical (for the $1000 price of course) although they can now be had for $699 a pair which is an absolute steal. Similar Products Used: NONE |
[Sep 30, 1999]
Michael
an Audio Enthusiast
I really can't see why anyone would give these speakers anything less than a 2-3 star rating. One star? You've got to be kidding me. |
[Sep 30, 1999]
Kevin
an Audiophile
Better than anything Polk or AR or Infinity or JBL has to offer in the same price category. Just under B&W in terms of pure performance and quality ... but again the former is usually priced quite higher. CSW Tower II's will do an awesome job, whether it be CD or DVD, Stereo or 5.1! |
[Mar 01, 1999]
Anthony Cordeiro
a Casual Listener
I'm not going to pretend to know more than I do, here, but I readthrough the reviews already here and felt that there's a lot of |
[Mar 10, 1999]
Dennis Blejer
an Audiophile
I've had the Tower IIs for about 2 years now. The rest of my system has gone through considerable upgrades but I have yet to feel that I need to upgrade these puppies. The rest of my system consists of the Proceed AVP pre/pro, ATI 1505 5 ch power amp, Rotel RDD-980 CD transport, Marantz DVD-810, CSW Centerstage, Powered Sub, and Optimus Pro NX 77s for surround speakers. I use the system extensively for music and HT. I also have a stereo system downstairs for music that uses the NHT SuperOne Xu speakers. I often after listening to a CD on my stereo system will play the same CD upstairs. The Tower IIs are far superior to the SuperOnes. Of course, the Tower IIs are full range and the Superones cut off at 50 Hz, but even so, the sound from the Towers is sweeter clearer, purer and more engaging. If you know the SuperOnes then you know how well they perform and how highly rated they are - the Tower IIs are simply better period. As for the bass of the Towers being bloated - look at your room acoustics! Unless you have an acoustically treated room you have bass problems at the low end; that is simply physics. The Tower IIs may not have the flatest bass response of any speaker but to pay more without considering your room is absurd. |
[Mar 10, 1999]
Tom
an Audio Enthusiast
I've owned the Tower II's for about 2 years. When I first set them up, I was not particularly impressed by their sound. However, I naturally attributed this to lack of proper break-in. As time went on, though, I continued to be perplexed by the sound - the bloated bass, relatively non-linear midrange and often shrill unnatural highs failed to improve. I really tried to like these speakers but in the end I finally gave up and purchased a pair of B&W CDM7SE's which are simply fantastic! (and they're not even broken-in yet). I can't say the Tower II's are horrible but only merely acceptable, in fact they would probably be a reasonble value if they were $500 dollars cheaper. |
[Mar 28, 2001]
Herb
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Good bass, wide high sound stage
Weakness:
Problems resolving brushed snares and cymbals. I was looking for a full range speaker for my main stereo system. Had already bought a pair of B&W 603's but found that they were lacking clarity and power in the bass region. Plucked bass violins became boomy on the 603's, if the bass control on the receiver was boosted. Similar Products Used: Advent Legacy II's, III's, B&W 603S2's |
[Apr 25, 1999]
Jeff
an Audio Enthusiast
There obviously is a very wide range of opinions on the TOWERII's! I have owned these now for 6 months and am very satisfied. They did take 2-3 weeks to "break-in", after that the sound became very natural and pleasant. I listen to mostly "classic-rock", jazz, and blues. These babies sing! Bass response is very good; tight and deep. Mid-range and high frequencies are very smooth and natural. They are teamed up in my system with an Onkyo 100/ch. receiver, Onkyo C340 disc changer, and Infinity BU120 sub. I have experimented to great extremes with the positioning of the speakers and have realized they must stay away from the rear walls 7-10 inches. Once I realized this, the soundstage and bass response opened up tremendously! I am a drummer in a rock/country band and I DO know what live music and "kick" should sound like; for $1000, these speakers can't be beat! Give them a try; you should be pleased! |
[Aug 25, 2001]
mike aubin
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
good clean bass and excellant mid's & highs
Weakness:
looks These are the best sounding speakers I have ever heard for under 1000. The sound just got better when I switched my sony 100w reciever for a marantz 70w high currunt reciever and bi-wired the towers. What a difference! They sounded great before, but now it's awesome. Do not pass these up because of the looks, the sound is what matters. Similar Products Used: infinity,polk |