Dynaudio CONTOUR S 3.4 Floorstanding Speakers
Dynaudio CONTOUR S 3.4 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 01, 2021]
texnutter
Strength:
Clarity whatever you throw at it. Natural sounding. Good looks and build Weakness:
Tweeter can sound a little bit clipped Purchased: Used
|
[Jan 01, 2020]
texnutter
Strength:
Very natural sound Can never get tired of listening to them. Good looks Solid build Reliable Weakness:
Tweeter may sound a little bit clipped at the end. Some of friends say they prefer this to the endless type as it makes for a clearer sound. Price Paid: 2500
Purchased: Used
Model Year: 2012
|
[Jan 17, 2019]
doraboots
Strength:
The best speaker you can buy under $8000. Weakness:
I wish I bought them years ago Purchased: Used
Model Year: 2012
|
[Jun 07, 2013]
Evans224
Audio Enthusiast
These speakers needed another review, and since I've owned them for 10 months, I think I can say without question that they will be with me for the long term. I upgraded from a wonderful stand-mounted speaker (NOLA Boxers) because I needed to hear more of the music from a floorstander. I came across these used at a terrific price, and could not pass them up.
|
[Mar 10, 2007]
Godfrey L.
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Everything that everybody has said about this speaker is true. If you want to hear the music and emotions of the performer, this delivers.
Weakness:
None. I had to add another review for this speaker as there is certainly a lack of them on the net. The typical review has to be clinical for good reason. And through this pile of net speaker reviews, I needed to make a call on wether to buy a 2nd hand high end speaker, previously unknown to me.
|
[Feb 19, 2007]
RossFlet
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Amazing imaging, crystal clear treble. Non fatiguing listening small footprint by comparison with competitors
Weakness:
Expensive. Need plenty of power to sound their best. Cosmetically, an industrial look. I read the review by Simple - a shorter version of the one he wrote for Audioasylum - with considerable interest having auditioned these speakers some months earlier. This prompted a second listen and ultimately a purchase. Having had Proac speakers before with rear firing ports (2) that produce a retreating soundstage it was interesting to note that the soundstage was further forward with the Dynaudio with only one rear firing port. But the left to right imaging is superb.
|
[Jun 21, 2006]
audio tragic
AudioPhile
Strength:
distortion free, dynamic range, imaging both left and right front and back and hieght, designer looks. small foot print in the room. power handling
Weakness:
price price and price well i cant believe this is only the second review,for such a outstanding speaker.
Similar Products Used: B&W 580. cerwin vega. dynaudio audienc42, sonus faber concerto |
[Jun 28, 2004]
Simple
AudioPhile
Strength:
The soundstage is always well developed and reachable. There is an ambience of space which is larger and more enveloping as compared to the Dynaudio Special 25s. The rhythm and boogie-factor is felt in spades. They are well balanced, and very smooth, portraying all the beautiful timbre's and musical textures more times than not -- without dancing the fine line of over extending it’s resolution capabilities. To convey the intrinsic magic many of us search for in a loudspeaker, and given it's asking price and performance - I dare say that with the Dynaudio S3.4 we have " a new Classic". Bravo Dynaudio, and thank you ! The S3.4's arrived double-boxed a few weeks back and had a fairly easy and un-eventful break-in period as I played them continually with 2-channel audio and 2-channel dvd films at various volumes. Compared to the Special25's (more on the S25 later) which took well over 2-monthes to fully break-in; the S3.4's were quick to open up and relax. Cosmetically the S3.4's are a simple and refined Danish design with subtle cues from the more expensive Confidence and Evidence lines. The black base plinth's are a wonderful touch and anchor the S3.4 to the floor and incorporate a spike-level-adjustable feature from the top, i.e. you don't have to turn the S3.4 on it's side or upside down to adjust the spikes. The grill-cloth's are situated on the drivers metal face plates via hidden magnets, and can be taken on and off with a slow and steady pull; these are not flimsy connections at all and the magnetic tightness is surprising; no plastic nubs to break-off. The grills hug the corners in a tear-drop fashion and perfectly align with the outside perimeter of the drivers. From the profile view, you are able to see through the grill spacing and the profile of the drivers edges as well as the round side of the tweeter. All of it is tightly nestled behind the grills; giving it a 'multi layered sandwich effect'. The (2) 6.5" newly designed drivers reside vertically above the newly designed 1" soft-dome tweeter. The fit and finish are flawless; as one should expect in any loudspeaker priced at $5,000. Standard WBT clear binding posts (no bi-wire; i.e. clean and simple) are found at the bottom rear. The S3.4 are not imposing nor bulky, and will not physically overwhelm a smaller/medium sized room; as their footprint is very small and reasonable. Sliding them on carpet is a breeze. For comparison purposes: the front dimension of the S3.4's are narrower and slightly taller than the S25's (if you have the S25's on 24" stands), and the depth is very similar. Overall, the look and stance of the S3.4 is not predominantly "rectangular" as you'd expect, instead you will find your eyes following the hour-glass curves of the face-plate/grill clothes tear-drop shape directly flowing down towards the complementary curves of the base-plates. You should know that imaging is one of the quality's that we are very fond of when auditioning speakers and eventually a big factor when selecting them for our home. Typically we are not huge fans of big floor-standing loudspeakers because they don't always typically image as well as smaller 2-way (physically smaller box) monitor(s). Well, the S3.4's do image equally as well as our S25's and prior 1.3SE's. In many ways the S3.4's bettered the smaller box models with respect to the height, size, and depth of the image. Not only does the 46" tall S3.4 disappear -- it does so, easily. We have owned most B&W Matrix models, a few B&W Nautilus models, and the WilsonAudio Witts. Many of them a fine speaker; however in most cases the imaging and overall picture/image of the music would suffer. The S3.4's have a very ‘tangible’ and un-processed quality, and they are not like any prior speaker we've owned or auditioned. The S3.4's possess a new and exceptional 'voicing' as compared to all older models of Dyn's. The only way that I can articulate what my ears hear is to say that the timbre and resonance character has been made more organic and integrated. Part of what constitutes the organic flavor is the smoothness between drivers and overall tonal balance (not lean; not heavy; not light; not dark) as well as the drivers themselves; also the inverted driver array. The voicing of the S3.4's is one of it's greatest strengths and should appeal to many who audition them. There is a real sense of flow that you will immediately notice upon your first audition. One criteria that we both dislike when auditioning any loudspeaker is: the amount of manufactured bass "bloom" in the lower bass regions. Many other loudspeaker makers seem quick and proud to cloud the lower regions with something other than musical instrument reproduction; we refer to it as "made-up bass noise". While listening to the S3.4's we did not hear any discernable made-up bass or artificial bloom - Period. What we did experience was fluent and expressive bass notes from real instruments. In comparison to the the S25's and 1.3SE's: both of those models are not able to match the frequency response of the S3.4's. The S3.4's have remarkable bass response; I cannot quote you a frequency range as of this writing; but it puts a smile on our face everytime the S3.4 starts digging deep - and it does so without adding any artificial ingredients, and it does so easily. Summary: The Dynaudio S3.4's Contours in contrast, embody a new and Natural voicing that convincingly sounds right on most source material. The S3.4's present a strong organic character when portraying instruments and vocals; without the additives. Similar Products Used: Dynaudio 1.3 Special Editions, Dynaudio Special 25's, Dynaudio Confidence C1's, Dali Euphonia MS4, Wilson Audio Witt, B&W Matrix (most), B&W Nautilus (805) |