Energy Speaker Systems e:XL 26 Floorstanding Speakers
Energy Speaker Systems e:XL 26 Floorstanding Speakers
[Oct 09, 2001]
Robert Nancy
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
excellent highs
Weakness:
weak midrange and bass I did an in store comparison of these with the Paridigm monitor 7s. Both speaks use the same layout of drivers but sound very different. While the Energy speakers have much louder highs - I think they may have been ever so slightly clearer too, but that could just be the loudness of the highs, - the Paradigm's have much tighter midrange and base. Overall the Paradigm seems to be a much more "natural" sounding speaker. Check out the monitor 7's if your looking at speakers in this price range/style. Similar Products Used: Paradigm monitor 7 |
[Dec 02, 2001]
Andrew
Casual Listener
Strength:
Hometheater and sensitivity 94 db, Classical, New age
Weakness:
highs are overwhelming(maybe I haven't worked it in yet). These speakers are fantastic for hometheatre in cojunction with the Exl c2 center, exl s12 sub and exl 16 bookshelf. The tones are well balanced with this set-up since they use the same woofer and tweeter. Similar Products Used: exl 16 |
[Jan 18, 2002]
Steve Snodgrass
Audiophile
Strength:
Good imaging. Wide dispersal. Good clarity on the mid-bass.
Weakness:
Sorry, but I think they are slightly wierd looking. "Hey, hey look at me!" (no biggy though) I have an old pair of Pioneer HPM-100 speakers purchased in 1977. Polk was an infant back then (but the Polk 10's were great sounding), and JBL-100's ruled. The Pioneers are very close in sound (Pioneer used to turn out high-end audiophile stuff back then, $600/pr/MSRP in '77 dollars!) Similar Products Used: None, But listened to Polk and Infinity before choosing these. |
[Jan 04, 2002]
Joe Donley
Audio Enthusiast
I find it interesting that just about everyone who low rates these speakers has based their rating from an "in store comparison". For those people, don't rate something until you have had some experience with it. Do you honestly think professional reviewers rate something without taking it home and trying it for a while. Just a comment. |
[Nov 21, 2001]
Erik Vorwerk
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very Accurate highs mids and Lows. Need to spend much more to compete with these babies!
Weakness:
Does looking too good count as a weakness? I have owned these particular speakers for some time now and am constantly suprised by the sound these speakers produce. I have listened to many speakers ranging in price from $500-$1500 dollars each and they can't satisfy me like the Energy E-XL26 does. When listening to any kind of music from rap to classical, I have never been dissapointed. When watching Star Wars Episode I, I actually debated buying a Subwoofer because the lows were couch shaking. Of course I did eventually buy a sub, but I wasn't in any huge hurry. All in all, I am very pleased with these speakers and would highly recommend them to everybody, no-matter what your tastes are. Similar Products Used: too many to list |
[Oct 06, 2001]
Martin Ritchie
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Solid Base, Good Definition
Weakness:
Cheapo Feet, Takes a while to get used to I purchased a pair of these 'cosmetically blemished' at the beginning of September and have really enjoyed them. Hooking them up to my new Cambridge D300se and my old (are you listening santa) Kenwood reciever I have been playing around with them for about a month. Despite the limitations of the amplifier I am getting a really good clean sound from these units and have the following comments. Similar Products Used: Cheap Panasonic, Old Boston Acoustics |
[Jul 04, 1998]
Steven H.
a Casual Listener
I was looking for some speakers, and after reviewing $ 3000 Monitor brands, (very nice), I was about to buy the Energy or Mirage OmniPolars, but on the way to the till, I see the Energy e:XL 26's....and WOW! They do not sound as clear as the Monitors, but at 1/3rd the price, I think they are awesome. |
[Jul 04, 1998]
Scott M.
an Audio Enthusiast
I have had my Energy e:XL 26's for about 3 months and really, really like them!!I compared them side-by-side to B&W 604's and found them fairly similar but about $300 less and slightly more neutral. I also considered Paradigm Studio 60s or 80s. At the time I was only going to use my receiver to power them so I wanted an efficient speaker which ruled out the Studio 80s. I am now using 2 Audio Source amp 3's bridged that put out about 400 watts each. I am extrememly happy with the sound as I have a two story open family room to fill with sound. I also have a Cambridge Soundworks 12" sub and slave 12" to fill out the bottom end. I am using 2 e:XL 16's for my center channeland no surround currently.I highly recommend these speakers to anyone at this price point up to several thousand $$$s. I still have some preference towards the Paradigm Studio 80's but for half the cost and very good imaging, sound reproduction and excellent construction, the Energy e:XL 26's are hard to beat!! |
[Jun 30, 1998]
Stephen F. Pariser
I want to respond to Lu-I don't know what kind of amp Lu used to listen to the speakers---but I have had audiophiles with $10,000 to $50,000 worth of gear listen and they are blown away by the warm natural sound of these speakers. Listen to them with an Onkyo receiver SV-444 and they are wonderful. Listen with a Cary tube preamp and an Adcom power amp and you will be dazzled. Listen to jazz organ and tenor sax, a symphony, or classic rock and you will feel exhilerated. |
[May 11, 1998]
Lu
an Audio Enthusiast
This is the largest model in the new Energy line. This is new line is also the worst of the Energy line. The sound is just bad. No definitions, no sound stage and not focused. I first thought the dealer wire the thing out of phase because I can not believe Energy will put out such bad speakers at $750 a pair. In the same room with the same electronics, I think you can even argue that the Take 5 has better sound. There are much better speakers at lower price. One speaker. |