Infinity Systems Kappa 8.1 Floorstanding Speakers
Infinity Systems Kappa 8.1 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Mar 05, 2002]
Ken
Audio Enthusiast
This is an updated review of the Infinity Kappa 8.1. I was thinking to replace this Kappa for quite a few months. However, after going through several auditions on the Quad 988, Infinity Sigma, and Avalon Eidolon, I decided to keep the Kappa. Instead of upgrading the speaker, I changed the two sets of interconnect cables to Granite Audio #470 XLR. These cables really give a second life to the Kappa. The bass is as solid as from the Sigma - tight and clean. Its mid range is as dynamic as the Quad. Although its soundstage is not as good as the Eidolon, it is not too far behind, especially in considering the Eidolon costs over $20K/pair. I expect the quality of sound will be greatly improved after the burning in of cables. With the right system, the Kappa is as good as any speaker that costs 3 or 4 times its MSRP. If you can get the Kappa under a thousand dollars, it will be a steal. |
[Feb 07, 2002]
JDS
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Soundstage is enormous, looks, clarity, airy and transparent, awesome highs without being harsh, EMIT and Polydome mid bass
Weakness:
None I have the Kappa 8 not the 8.1. I bought these used and I must say they are among the finest ever made at the price I paid for them. Soundstage is so enormous....playing Van Halen made me feel like I was there in a concert....so far haven''t experienced low impendance problems even with the bass boost switch on and having a bass boost on my amp turned on using a Sony STR-V939X Japanese market model home theatre receiver that pumps out 150 watts per channel into 6 ohms...but then again the max that I have ever turned up in terms of volume is a 4 on my dial..it gets so loud my landlord might kick me out! bass is an absolute killer, tight as a drum that u can feel.. I really love the midbass dome driver...I can hear the midbass drums as clear as live..highs are natural and oh so transparent with the EMITs..I have Kappa 8s for fronts and Kappa 7s for the rears with the Infinity IL36c for center. On the movie heat you can feel the bass and the bullets flying around you....I almost the Kappa 9 for use as my fronts and I was going to move the 8s as my rears but my apartment was too small for the 9s. I am also highly impressed with Infinity''s new Interlude series that uses CMMD drivers. Sound is impressive from these new drivers and Interlude series are a good match especially for center channel for the Kappas. Highly recommended Similar Products Used: Infinity 3 way IMG woofer/polycell tweeter bookshelf |
[Dec 11, 2001]
Charnet Chevalier
Audiophile
Strength:
Audiophile quality sound at a now reasonable price.
Weakness:
The Polygraph really is not well suited for hard rock, but this can be solved using the Renaissance 90 midbass, which is still avalable. Using both the Polygraph and Ren midbass provides even greater sound quality, but some electronic work is needed. The Infinity Reference Standard Kappa 8 is truly a superior speaker to the newer Kappa 8.1; there are several reasons for this, mainly, the Kappa 8s utilize the EMIT tweeters on the front and back of the cabinet. The Kappa 8 also has better mid base control due to the Polygraph. My only complaint about the utilization of the Polygraph is that it lacks the dynamics of a cone driver at frequencies below 160 cycles. This problem can be remedied by either changing the crossover point internally, or by using an electronic crossover, set at 160 cycles. I have used these speakers as reference monitors and they have compared favorably with the Renaissance 90s and the Reference Standard 2.5s. Although the RS 2.5s and RS 4.5s,as well as the QLS fare better in the bass region, the low mid to high frequency is extremely smooth and accurate. I have noticed, lately, that these speakers have become available on eBay for less than a thousand dollars. I believe this is really a bargain, if you can acquire them for a moderate shipping cost. Similar Products Used: Most "Golden era" Infinity speakers, such as, the RS 4.5, RS1 and QLS |
[Jul 09, 2000]
Stephen Daedalus
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Good imaging; broad, deep soundstage; impressive output at low frequencies (29 Hz); Excellent home theatre loudspeaker.
Weakness:
Emit-R tweeters are prone to sibillance and to smearing of "S" and "P" vocals; low-bass output -- while impressive -- lacks both the punch and focus of the better sealed designs; cheap plastic binding posts. I've owned my Kappa 8.1s since early 1994, at which time they became my first quasi-higher-end loudspeaker acquisition (replacing a pair of vintage -- heck, certifiably classic -- Acoustic Research AR-1s that I'd used and abused through most of high school and college). They're very good all purpose monitors, and if you enjoy a smattering of hard rock, folk, jazz and classical music -- and if you can find a used pair -- you might do well to consider them. At the same time, however, you can probably pick up a used pair of Vandersteen 2CEs for around the same price. Having lived with both speakers at one time or another, I'll suggest that the Vandys are better than are the Kappa 8.1s for reproducing most all types of music. Similar Products Used: Infinity Renaissance 90, Infinity 9 Kappa, Vandersteen 2CE/3A Signature, Thiel CS 2.2/2.3/3.6 |
[May 31, 2001]
Arthur K
Audiophile
Strength:
Huge sound stage and depth
Weakness:
Sound not as 'refined' as some of the audiophile class speakers. Had my Kappas now for 6 years and had no problem at all. Similar Products Used: JBL monitors, AR, KEF Reference 1 Monitor Audio etc. |
[Jan 26, 2002]
Ken
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
bass It is one of the better speakers for jazz and the kind of music that my 16 years old likes. This speaker is not for classical music. It is the weakest of my whole system. However, for the price that I paid for it, I will give it a 5 stars. Similar Products Used: JBL L112, Kappa 5.1 |
[Aug 14, 1998]
Joe Marinan
an Audio Enthusiast
Just spent a year (!) dealing with the Legacy Focus which seems to be just too big for my room (22x14x8.5); they "boom" (10dB) between 100h-160h. Only way to decent performance (after discarding 5 equalizers) was bi-amping at a xover point of about 100h-125h, which depresses the "boom" area.Recently picked up a pair of (discontinued and heavily discounted) Kappa 8.1s, thinking that with only 1/3rd the woofers, they might "fit" the room. Lo and behold, you can not tell the two brands apart from the frequency response curves! The self same "room boom" at 100h-160h. Although they measure the same, the raw Kappas are much more "listenable"; the boom is not so pronounced to the ear. I can not imagine why this should be, but it is. Anyway, switching to the biamp setup cures the problem just like it did with the Foci. Of course, they do not have the mid range clarity of the far more expensive speaker, but the sound stage is bigger; a trade off? |
[Dec 20, 1999]
Mark Ferdinandi
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Nice Tight Bass For Music and Movie Uses Ive Owned a pair of Kappa 8.1's for about a year and a half. The speaker is being used for both movies and music. i have not had any problem with the speaker. It fullfills any average audio enthusiast need in a wonderful speaker. |
[Feb 18, 1999]
Matt
an Audio Enthusiast
Have owened a pair of 8.1 Kappas since 96" and have thourghly enjoyed them.I use them for music as well as movies. I also use 3 Kappa center speakers |
[Jan 29, 2000]
george
Casual Listener
I have used these speakers for 2 years. I have always been very pleased with the sound even when I was driving them with underpowered sony receiver. Recently I got an amplifier and decided to biamp these speakers and the result is amazing. Everything improved greatly, especially the dynamic range which brings me a step closer to live performance. As a classical music listener image and soundstage are very important. I have yet heard another pair of speakers under $4000 that could reproduce the sound stage and precise image that my Kappas could. |