JBL 4312 Floorstanding Speakers
JBL 4312 Floorstanding Speakers
[May 30, 1998]
Fernando Stincer
an Audio Enthusiast
I've had these speakers for over 8 years and they have never |
[Dec 17, 1998]
Steve Johnston
an Audio Enthusiast
My 4312s are 13 (almost 14) years old. They're a little scratched and have a couple of dings in the oak casings from being moved around the world and back again, but they still sound great. I've worked in radio and television for years and have never heard anything better. If you're getting poor performance, make sure you have an amplifier that can drive the speaker well. I've used the same old 200 watt Kenwood since buying the speakers and have had no problems. |
[Dec 29, 1998]
Howard
an Audio Enthusiast
These things are top-notty. They accurately output the recording as was intended by the sound engineers. I have them paired with an Onkyo receiver and CD player and AudioQuest cables and everyone that listens to them are amazed. |
[Sep 10, 1999]
Frank
an Audiophile
Ok, They may have been good 10 years ago, maybe a 3.5 or 4. But now? Get real. A $250 pair of B&W DM302's image better and have a clearer midrange. |
[Oct 24, 1999]
David Elton
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
presence, impact First off all, these are studio monitors,i.e. they do have a distinctive sound by design, if you are not familier with, or don't care for that sound, then listen carefuly before a purchase. Even though they are an older design, I believe they still more than hold their own. Solid cabinets and massive driver motor structures produce almost everything effortlessly. Bass??- Mine will shake the floor on pipe organ recordings. Check them out if you love the old JBL Monitor sound! Similar Products Used: Altec605A's |
[Aug 14, 1999]
effeti
an Audiophile
Very good speaker |
[Nov 27, 2000]
michael miller
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
reproduction-
Weakness:
cheep conection posts I can not remember when exactly I pechased these but it was Similar Products Used: jbl4311 |
[Jan 06, 2000]
yee
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
They're efficient and better than Bose
Weakness:
Ear piercing highs; unnatural mids; Slow, thumpy, detailess bass. Its amazing that these speakers are still available. No company makes speakers so tonally iaccurate any more. |
[Dec 28, 1999]
Ernie O'Connor
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very efficient reproduction. Industry reference monitor designed accurately to replay source recordings.
Weakness:
None I first purchased my 4312's in 1985, and added another pair in 1994. I appreciate these monitors because they aren't designed to be popular retail outlet speakers. They are true heavy duty monitors designed to reproduce source material. Their original design dates back to the late 60's at the request of the recording industry. They have been periodically up dated until being replaced by the 4412's. The driver motor is the biggest I am aware of in any 12 inch driver. That is one reason they are so tight and not victim to loose base response. Those that understand their "design purpose" know what I mean. They're still excellent. I recently went shopping for speakers for another room only to end up ordering the new 4412's from JBL. They so influenced me that my surround system including sub-woofer is all JBL. Similar Products Used: ElectroVoice and Infinity, both top notch as well. |
[Oct 07, 1997]
Peter Jacobs
an Audio Enthusiast
Still kicking after 6 years. I love these speakers and refuse to part with them. |