KEF Q30 Floorstanding Speakers
KEF Q30 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 01, 2012]
spk984
Audio Enthusiast
After delegating these speakers from dedicated music room to family room my son pumped endless hours of bass heavy dub step through them and still they amaze me with accurate detailed treble and a full rich bass. Longevity, beautiful sound in a sub 1000$ speaker makes these a rare gem. Highly recommend them as a used speaker purchase if anyone is actually willing to part with them.
|
[Dec 21, 2010]
Jason
Audio Enthusiast
Terrible speakers. Lacking serious definition and fidelity. Truly waste of money. |
[Jul 22, 2003]
christopher baus
Casual Listener
This is an over rated speaker. It is essentially a coaxial driver of about the same quality as a mediocre car speaker in a large enclosure. The enclosure does help get a reasonable, but not great for a cabinet of this size, bass response. They are also painfully inefficient. I tried them with an old tube amp. That was a joke. I now use them as near field monitors with a large adcom amplifier that would drive many speakers to an ear splitting level just to get any dynamic range from them. In my opinion mid range defines a quality speaker, and it just isn't there. Vocals are too often muddled, especially with material with any bass content. While the bass reflex design does extend lower registers, it comes at a cost of precise mid range control. If you are looking at speakers in this price range I would seriously look at the B&W 600 series, which sets the standard for this price range. |
[Mar 02, 2002]
joris van Beers
AudioPhile
Strength:
Excellent vocal sound
Weakness:
bi-wiring, a little lack of bass I bought in 1995 the dynaudio''s gemini''s, when I listened to them after a few months I missed the vocal detail and the bass. I placed my dynaudio gemini''s on a market place site and traded them for Kef Q30''s. I always loved kef speakers. I owned a pair of C80, and they sounded great. After the trade I was surprised how beautiful these speaker sounds. The vocals sounds clear and crispy, much better than the dynaudio gemini''s Ok the bass isn''t like the kef C80, but I use my subwoofer to pull up the bass. |
[Dec 15, 2001]
Alan
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent stereo and HT sound! This is my second pair of Q 30s. (first pair was stolen) These are the best speakers I have ever owned! Currently I have them as my front speakers in my surround system, connected to my Marantz SR5000. Awesome! Great for stereo and for surround. I have a 12" paradigm sub, so they don't have to handle the low end. With a sub, I think they sound better than the Q55s. If you can find these anywhere, buy them! Similar Products Used: Infinity, paradigm |
[Jul 03, 2001]
Daan Herreman
Casual Listener
Strength:
Excellent speakers for their price category
Weakness:
none to my knowledge I have used this pair of Uni Q 30 speakers for about six years now, and still enjoying their sound. I use a 2x50w integrated amplifier by Philips, which will soon be replaced by the Onkyo A9211 ( after recommendations from your site). Similar Products Used: I used lo-fi material before this. |
[Mar 08, 1998]
David Ahn
an Audio Enthusiast
Kef's Q30 speakers consist of a single 6.5" midbass driver with a 1" tweeter with a coincident center, what they call a Uni-Q driver. Sensitivity is rated as 89 dB, and the frequency response is 50 to 20 kHz +/- 3 dB. It essentially tied for first with the Klipsch KG 3.5 when a mini-tower shootout (under $600) was done by Stereo Review in 1995. I bought it for its aesthetic (more modern) appeal over the KG 3.5. The price in 1995 was $450 for the pair. |
[Apr 20, 1998]
Dennis Kwok
an Audio Enthusiast
I've now owned my much loved Q30's for over two years and since that time, I have used them with 3 different makes of amplifier, and each time they have responded to the upgraded amplification magnificently. At the moment, they are hooked up a Quad 77 pre/power system and they are certainly not outclassed. If I do have one grumble, it would be that bass extension isn't the deepest, but the bass they do give is tight and accurate and the imageging they achieve at there price point has yet to be bettered. A score of five, no question. |
[Feb 17, 1998]
Wayne Laing
a Casual Listener
I bought these demo speakers from a local dealer for less than half of the original price. I have to say these are pretty decent speakers. They go down to pretty low from what they have -- 6 1/2 in woofer in Uni-Q design. I had some doubt before purchasing them since they were not hailed as in the same league as speakers from NHT and B&W. But I have to say they do a pretty good job in my listening room. |
[Jan 06, 1999]
Charles Jodry
I must admit that I bought these speakers based in part on the review appearing in Stereo Review. I am very happy I did. They are used as my front speakers in my home theatre which is driven through a Yamaha RXV-670 (soon to be upgraded to B+K reference 20 preamp and AV5000 5 channel power amp)and they are matched with a B+W DW 600 center channel, Klipsch powered sub and Boston Acoustic HD5's for surrounds. I was impressed at how sonically close the Klipsch Q30's are to my B+W center. I paid $380.00 for the pair in 1995 and believe they will stay in my system for awhile, as I have invested in the seperate components. I am really looking forward to listening to them with my new B+K gear. Strongly recommended. |