KEF Q35 Floorstanding Speakers
KEF Q35 Floorstanding Speakers
[May 31, 1999]
O Candemir
an Audio Enthusiast
The Q35 is the best speaker for its price no questions asked. |
[Sep 01, 1999]
Robin Liebrechts
an Audio Enthusiast
This Kef Q35 is quite good stuff, but it sounds to dark for me. The midband is very good indeed but there is not much treble and bass. The sound sometimes was a bit plastic. when I listen to my system, Marantz PM 66 KI amplifier, Marantz CD 63 KI CD-player and Denon TU 235 Tuner and Van den Hul D102 Mk III and MK VI interconnects, there always were very irritating treble nasties, especially with the tuner. And this is not a fault of the Denon. so I sold the Kef's and bougth me some Mission 774's. The Missions are ten times better than the Kef's. |
[Dec 19, 1999]
Justin Lawrence
Audiophile
Strength:
Good treble strong midrange open soundstage These speakers work well for both movies and music a good speaker. Similar Products Used: Mission 752`s |
[Oct 12, 1999]
Jeff Wong
Casual Listener
Strength:
Good Clarity on high notes, especially good for music.
Weakness:
When volume gets too high, the sound goes edginess. Bass is very poor. I think the Q35 cannot match the Tannoy R2. But Q35 is slightly better off than the AE109, in terms of treble. I would give the Tannoy R2 an overall winner. In terms of looks, sound and budget, R2 has it all. However, if budget is a constraint that the Q35 is an acceptable buy. Similar Products Used: Tested side by side with Tannoy R2 and AE109. |
[Mar 05, 1999]
Erik Thiede
an Audio Enthusiast
I have had the Q35s for 6 months now and enjoy them very much. I checked out other speakers in the $600 to $1200 and i am said to say nothing came close to the Q35s. I would pay twice the price for the kefs and still be happy. my last pair that was worth listening to as much as these were the dalquist DQ 10s.Please note the KEFs sound best with 80 to 125 watts of CLEAN POWER like NAD ADCOM or CARVER! |
[Apr 19, 1999]
KEVIN
an Audio Enthusiast
I have owned my Kef q35's for almost a year now and I feel that dollar for dollar these speakers offer a ton of great features. They have the imaging and large soundstage that twice the money couldn't buy (more than the tannoy m3's or mission 752's) and now have a new maple finish. they are bi-wirable (thought the binding posts could be a little fancier)and i agree with the other reviewer that you have top be careful when screwing in the carpet spikes. There only weakness seems to be a lack in the bottom-end, and even when put close to a wall the sound becomes more muddied rather than boomy. Great for jazz and classical, not for house or rap (get paradigm monitor 5s instead). |
[Oct 01, 1997]
Werner
an Audiophile
A small column speaker with coincident tweeter and woofershould give excellent stereo and neutrality, theory |
[Jan 21, 2001]
Lentil
Audiophile
Strength:
Clear midrange, great vocals
Weakness:
bass - more convinced now than ever I'm moving my KEFs from being my main speakers to my home theater speakers. I agree that the bass is not that strong, and this has never been my concern - listening tastes are based on jazz and other midrange strong music. However recently a good friend spent US 15K on used Krell and Avalon speakers, which really brought out the weakness in the bass Similar Products Used: B&W |
[Mar 22, 1999]
Gerald Caponetti
an Audio Enthusiast
I have owned this speaker for about 9 months and I enjoy them very much. The upper end of their range is excellent, but the bass, while not |
[Aug 16, 2000]
anthony
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
imaging
Weakness:
thin bass but knew that before buying Really enjoy the depth of image and how well they dovetail with my sub. Primarily listen to music but the Eagles and Natalie Merchant DVD simply blow me away in 5.1. Similar Products Used: rogers ls7 |