KEF Q7 Floorstanding Speakers

KEF Q7 Floorstanding Speakers 

DESCRIPTION

The 165mm (6 1/2") UNI-Q mid/HF driver array incorporates KEF''s sophisticated new 19mm (3/4") metal dome tweeter (Ferrofluid-cooled for improved power handling), so midrange is silken and vocals outstandingly pure. With the diaphragm area of a conventional 200mm (8") cone, KEF''s unique B169 ''racetrack'' format LF driver delivers terrific bass for such a slim cabinet. Computer-designed crossovers optimise sound quality, and KEF''s internal bracing eliminates the box resonances that often affect tall full size speakers.

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-10 of 11  
[Apr 04, 2015]
Mike
Audio Enthusiast

Fantastic value for money. I agree with other comments that running in takes time. Also they're very sensitive to positioning and room acoustics. Need to be at least 1 metre clear of walls and corners. Even if they sound good, try different speaker and listening positions and you might find them even better. Demo them in a good room with eyes closed listening to Eva Cassidy "Fields of Gold." You won't believe Eva died years ago.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Mar 14, 2010]
matty8
Audio Enthusiast

expect to be amazed,, eventually
i have owned many speakers in my time and a few things have become apparent to me, the first is that the best speakers in the world will sound bad if they are fed with bad signals from anywhere else in the system, fact! all speakers take ages to run in to there max potential, fact. ! all speakers have a place where they will sound best in the listening environment, fact !
i bought the kef q7 speakers in a sale for less than half price with only a quick demo, it has taken two years, yes two,, for them to run in,and thats listening for about 3 hours a day. during that time i have been faced with bright spells of shrieking treble all the way to being swamped with kidney shifting bass , but now i have a pair of speakers that connect me with the music in a way that i have seldom been privy to, i dont know why kef (and a few other manufacturers such as usher) speakers take so long to fully come on song but they do and it has been true of all 3 pairs of kefs i have owned so be patient and after the run in period is over you can start to consider placement, i found that in any room the q7's dont like symmetry, for some reason the bass disappears when the are set up symmetrically in the room, they absolutely love valves and vinyl too. lots of people have bought these speakers and been disappointed and sell them off very cheap so if you are looking for good second hand speakers that are truly revealing and the rest of your system is well balanced you simply cant go wrong (once they are run in and in the right position) great with all types of music and movies but truly exeptional with well recorded jazz, great frequency extension too. you can pick them up for less than £200 in mint condition.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Feb 13, 2010]
projectionscience
Audio Enthusiast

I bought these Q7 towers on Craigslist for a terrific price ($350 for the pair). I had previously owned Def Tech BP2004tl and bp2002tls. The Def Techs were phenomenal for home theater, but I never felt that their midrange or imaging was up to par for music. I also work for a Focal dealer, so I listen to focal Chorus 836's every day. The Focal's have awesome imaging, and a very wide sound stage.., and I will eventually buy a pair of them. Until that day, the Q7s are a great compromise. They don't have the overall realism or cabinet build quality of the Focals... but they are pretty close. The imaging is actually pretty good, and the bass response for home theater is respectable. I run them with a Mirage Omni S10 sub, and they sound more than adequate. Female vocals are well produced with them as well. The store I work for also carries Klipsch, Mirage, and Def Tech as well. The Kef Q7's smoke the Kilipsch's and Mirages, for imaging.... and can be picked up much cheaper. If you can afford Focals, get them. If not, the Kef Q7's are a close second.... and are currently a smoking bargain at $300-$650 per pair on Ebay now. These are a fantastic option for those on a budget, looking for a speaker that can realistically image and reproduce music.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Dec 21, 2004]
marsh34
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Awesome clarity, power handling, looks great, crisp highs and tight bass.

Weakness:

Maybe a touch pricey.

Amazing!! I bought these without any test drive. Very, Very, pleased. Chose these on word of mouth and reviews. You will not be disappointed if you need great speakers for music of surround.

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
2
[Dec 11, 2004]
daveash
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Great imaging, excellent for those rare moments when you can sit down and do some serious, critical listening. Beautiful finish (light maple)= high wife approval rating, very musical.

Weakness:

The speakers sound so good that some of my old CD's and lower bit rate MP3 files don't sound good. I am a little disappointed in the lack of bass, it sounded better in the store, so it could be my room acoustics. Also not very many dealers carry this brand.

I was looking for a pair of speakers for my family room for music listening. I already have a full Dolby Digital 6.1 system with a 56" wide screen in my basement for movies. That system has the Definitive Technology BP2006's (approximate same price range). I am very happy with the Deftech's for movie purposes (built in sub rocks). The Kef's have better imaging and a wider soundstage for music. They sound more accurate, especially in the mid range. You can actually see the instrument placement on the stage. In summary they sound very good for music. In the store, the bass seemed deeper. I even bought two of the CD's the salesman played (Rikki Lee Jones song is Dat Dere, and Stevie Ray Vaughn song was Tin Pan Alley), but I don't quite get the same sound. It could be room acoustics or an inferior receiver. I have an old powerful sub (M&K) that really helps with the lows, and occasionally I shut it off to hear the difference and it is dramatic, so unlike most other reviewers, I think a sub is a must. When I listen to female vocals, Celine Dion, Whitney Houston, Diana Krall, it seems they are in the room with you. Very natural and life like. With Steely Dan, or Jazz music, the instruments are all present and accounted for. With Eric Clapton's Unplugged or music DVD's, you feel like you are in the concert hall. I also listened to the Paradigm 9's, with a PSW-10 sub, and the Studio series, and some Boston Acoustics, but in the end, the KEF's sounded better to me. If the $1,000 - $1,200 range is as far as you can stretch and want to watch movies, you should also check out the Def Tech's because you won't need the extra expense for the sub. But if you think you could stretch your budget for the sub or don't mind spending a little extra in the future, the KEF's won't disappoint. One last point, I bought from an authorized dealer, Glen at Park Avenue Audio is very knowledgable and patient. They will ship. They gave me a 10% discount off of MSRP. You could find a little cheaper on the web, but I didn't want to take a chance that I was getting a refurbished item. My last set of speakers lasted 20 years and I expect these speakers to last even longer (I'm not a college kid cranking hard rock on a daily basis anymore).

Similar Products Used:

Definitive Technology (I own)... Boston Acoustics, Paradigm (tested in store).

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Jan 20, 2004]
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Clairity of sounds. Depth of width of soundstage. Tight, accurate bass. Awesome imaging. Quality vs. cost ratio.

Weakness:

Finish is mediocre, but perfectly acceptable.

I purchased the Q-7s in October of 2002 after trying out several different brands. I wanted a pair of tower speakers for home audio and home theater that cost under $1000. After intially wanting Paradigm Monitor 11s, I was immediatly struck by the Q-7s when I auditioned them in a specialty audio store. The soundstage is wide and transparent, and the imaging is first class--truly superb. Bass is very tight, mids are warm, and the highs are crystaline without being harsh. (The highs in the Paradigms were too harsh for me.) Every time I listen to these speakers I am impressed and completely satisfied. I can't imagine better sounding speakers for the price. When I first auditioned them for my wife she too was blown away. She said something to the effect of, "Are only two speakers on?" The sound of these speakers seems to envelop you. Try these speakers out with well-recorded material it will sound as if you are in the studio. With DVD-Audio and SACD they are truly exceptional. Movie playback is also top notch. Certain scenes will shake the couch without a sub, although I wouldn't say that these speakers couldn't be helped by a good sub. ALthough this review is only for the Q-7s, I have the Q-9 center channel and the Q-8s surrounds. While the Q-7s are the stars of the group, the Q series is excellent for home theater. Once I finally got all matching speakers, the sound was noticably improved. The build quality seems excellent. The veneer (I got black) is adaquate for the price range, but not exceptional. The front speaker grills also seem somewhat fragile, but these are very small quibbles. If it were up to me anyway, I would leave the grills off. The look of the metallic drivers is very impressive. In summary, I would recomend these speakers to anyone who is looking for a high-quality, medium priced pair of stereo speakers or for a pair to main speakers in a home theater context. I cannot express enough how pleased I am with how well these speakers perform with music. If you are a serious music lover, these speakers are for you.

Similar Products Used:

Paradigm Monitor 11s. Jamo E Series. Infinity Primus Series. (I liked the Q-7s better than all of them.)

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Oct 05, 2003]
Yarvis
Casual Listener

Strength:

Bi-wireable, 3 choices of color for cabinets. (black ash, dark apple (which I own and maple) Shielded, great imaging and bass.

Weakness:

Price, ( just a bit on the high side maybe by 100 hundred bucks or so) not real wood veneer. Might be isolated, but one speaker didn't play out of the box, I had to get a new unit immediately.

I auditioned the Paradigm Studio 60's ( I own Paradigm Monitor 7's in my family room home theater) along with the KEF Q7's. I found both speakers very pleasant sounding. Unfortunately the Paradigms also cost more than 200 hundred dollars more than the KEF's. I was and am trying to set up a fairly inexpensive 2 channel stereo in my living room, so cost was definitely a HUGE factor. OK, I know, "spend the most money you can on the best speakers you can." In my case I had to buy everything (amp, speakers, cd player, tape deck, tuner and rack) so again, overall cost would be a FACTOR. When you get speakers now a days, they come almost bullet proof with the way they are shipped and packed. The KEF's were no exception. You would think the way they are packed, nothing can be wrong with them when they come out of the box right? Wrong!!! When I went to hook up the speakers, my overall impression was that they were decent looking, well made units. As I was moving the units, I noticed and heard that one of them sounded as if there was something loose or rattling inside. Sure enough when I went to turn on the units, the one that was rattling wouldn't play! (I assume that the crossover or something inside dislodged itself) How the hell could this be? Boy was I pissed! Luckily my dealer, (fantastic BTW) made a trip personally to the KEF rep who happens to be in New Jersey, I was up and running in less than 1 day. The first few days I broke the speakers in with pink noise. (I was also breaking in my new amp as well) After listening to the speakers for a few days, I can't get over how sweet they sound! I bet once I get them bi-wired (which they are capable of) they will even sound better. I am also planning to upgrade all of the Monster cable and speaker wire for some better units. The KEFs imaging and bass capabilities are very impressive. In fact I will definitely say that these baby's rock when it comes to bass. With my Paradigms I need to use my sub or turn up the bass control to get decent bass out of them. (for 2 channel music) Not so with the KEFs, in fact everything is set completely flat in my system. I paid $1000 for them, in my opinion though they are more in the neighborhood of $800-900. More importantly, paying what I did for them and from whom I bought them from, has been a better customer service move. The dealer has been fantastic, even coming to my home to soundcheck them and move them around for better imaging and placement. All this for FREE, my favorite four letter word. I reccomend these speakers to anyone on a budget. If I had to knock anything big it would have to be that they are, according to the box, "designed and engineered in Great Britain", but made in CHINA! I hate that!!! But it seems that everything is made everyplace else than where you think it's supposed to be made at. (Marantz is also made in China) Does this detract from the sound, build or overall quality? Maybe not in these instances, but it could be a problem in others. I just like to see things made here or where they are supposed to be engineered at. But I understand about operating and or building costs. All in all a very fine speaker!

Similar Products Used:

Paradigm

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
3
[Sep 18, 2003]
Don
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Look and sound for the price

Weakness:

Quality of parts, construction and FINISH

Excellent look and design. Good sound, imaging and sound stage for the price. If you care about the quality of construction, the quality of the parts (drivers, connections, ...) and espacially the finish, STAY AWAY of this line of KEF. HiFi Choice gave this speaker 5 stars for sound and only 4 stars for the Built with a reason that I disoverd first hand later.

Similar Products Used:

PSB, Paradigm, Jamo, ...

OVERALL
RATING
2
VALUE
RATING
3
[Jul 17, 2003]
okitim
AudioPhile

Strength:

Bottom-end. Clarity (the single point music source really seems to matter).

Weakness:

None.

After shopping/listening for weeks, I bought the Q7s. The only speakers under $2500/pair that were comparable in precision and range were the Energy Veritas 2.3s (but with less bottom end), the Paradigm Studio 100s (very comparable; the cheaper paradigms DO NOT match the Kef), and the Tannoy Sensys. I actually just stumbled upon the Q7s on my way to buy the Energys. The Q7s image much better and are about 1/2 the price. Similarly priced speakers from other top brands had nowhere near the range. I tested using the Mickey Hart "Planet Drum" CD that I've heard test that Wilson Watt Puppys. (the CD has a recording of the worlds largest drum--very low frequency). The Kefs easily reproduce the frequencey. (My old Bostons couldn't touch it). Paired with a decent amp--good on my Yamaha; great on my Rotel--these speakers are the best find I've made!

Similar Products Used:

Used: Boston Accoustics HD10s. Compare with: Paradigm Studio 100 ($2000), Energy Veritas ($1800), Tannoy Sensys? ($2000).

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 22, 2003]
Faisal
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Mids and bass

Weakness:

Not real wood veneer

Ecellent speakers. Paired with Denon PMA2000IV amp. Great mids for vocals. A good all-around speaker. Great for movies. Good tight bass. Will not need a sub with these speakers for normal listening and even for home theatre. Biwirable. Clean, and accurate sound I was looking for speakers for several months and found these to be the best for the money. .

Similar Products Used:

Paradigm, JBL, Klipsch, Definitive Tech

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 1-10 of 11  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com