Klipsch RF-83 Floorstanding Speakers
Klipsch RF-83 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Nov 18, 2017]
steve
Audio Enthusiast
These speakers are incredible. Anyone that doesn't think that is probably imputing lower class input signal into them.
|
[Apr 01, 2012]
Craig
AudioPhile
Bought used.. Rf-83's are ok.. My Rf-7's (Dean G mod.) stomps all over the 83's. I'm running each into a pair of Krell Kav-250A's . The Rf-7's rule , so much detail , midrange and upper end. Bass is beefy.. Steer from the Rf-83's..Weak all the way around. |
[Nov 12, 2010]
fatdada423
Audio Enthusiast
My system is over 20 years old so I started to upgrade. I decided speakers were going to be my fisrt upgrade. I looked at several brand and decided on these Klispch Rf-83's based solely on the price I paid. If money did not matter i would not have choosen these. But since I am not rich I bought these.
|
[Aug 19, 2010]
HTM
AudioPhile
Have owned both the RF-63 and RF-83 speakers. All horn speakers tend to be best appreciated by those of an esotericlistening taste and the RF-83s in particular. They are room, source and cable sensitive. They produce an "in-your-face" sound that tends to brightness that encourages harmonic flutter. They require a fairly large room with a 16" x 16" being about the minimum for them to operate properly. These are speakers that really need a good 12 band equalizer. Definitely not for everybody.Both build and sound quality should be better for the price. |
[Mar 14, 2010]
davidaus
Audio Enthusiast
First, let me say this review is written by someone from Australia. The first disappointment we experienced with these speakers is that the speaker cones have been miss-represented by Klipsch. The cones are not 8" as they claim. The cones are only 7", and I don't appreciate being decieved by "over-bloated" manufacturing statistics to get a sale. If Klipsch is capable of miss-representing cone size; then what else are they capable miss-represented? We previously had a pair of Australian made Aaron ATS-5 speaker that these RF-83's replaced. Lets just say that the music experience we were expecting from the RF-83's have certainly not lived up to their review reputation. The RF-83's are more than $3000AUS more expensive that the Aaron ATS-5's, but the Aarons blow these Klipsch speakers in the weeds in every aspect. After having these FR-83's for over 6 months we have found that music fatigue develops after 1/2 hour of listening. Something the Aarons never did. We have now returned to the Aarons and put the RF-83's up for sale on ebay. The RF-83's really sound harsh to the extent that we would put then in the same catergory as cheap speakes under $500. Unfortunately we can only give 1, but we would have given 0 if allowed. Total disappointment, and I would recommend anyone wanting brilliant speakers to cjeck out the Aaron ATS-5's. |
[Oct 30, 2009]
wmiles
Audio Enthusiast
These heavy beasts will not dissapoint you. I have mine paired with a mid-range yamaha rx-565 and the sound is incredible. Play any type of music and the highs are so crisp and clear, you'll hear details you've never head before. Every breath can be heard, pic on the guitar, etc. You DO NOT NEED a subwoofer with these. 3 8" woofers on each speaker shake the whole house easily. Turn these up and they can put out some serious volume without any distortion. Even with my basic yammie amp I can rock my walls and hear them clearly in my neighbors house. Crazy!
|
[Oct 08, 2009]
Erik Berthelot
AudioPhile
I had waited a long time before upgrading my RF-3II's which I was really happy with since 2003. At the time the RF-83 were not available yet and the RF-7's was really what I would have wanted, had I had the money to buy them. But side by side with a real-time switch, the RF-3II only sounded like a smaller version of the RF-7's and I was ready to accept the small difference in sound as opposed to a huge difference in price.
|
[Sep 08, 2009]
timjeter
Audio Enthusiast
These speakers are a sound investment. I got them as demos so they were more or less broken in. I traded some Tannoys which I thought were a bit too colored for my taste. The Klipsch RF-83 has a rather flat and clear presentation. I believe this reflects the trend in speaker design today. On the whole I think they have lower distortion than the Tannoys.
|
[Apr 19, 2009]
Petar
AudioPhile
my God this is one serious speaker...with proper equipment it could last you a lifetime! |
[Mar 09, 2009]
wayne B.
Audio Enthusiast
I purchased my pair of Klipsch RF-83 Speakers approx. 1 year ago and shortly after wards noticed a very small indentation when the lighting was directed towards the speakers in a particular angle. I contacted the Klipsch Company and without hesitation they shipped and paid all expenses of the shipping and also the return of the speaker with the very small indentation. Afterwards Klipsch consumer relations department kept in close contact with concern that I was satisfied with everything else pertaining with my purchase of my Klipsch speakers. The deep rich quality of the highs and lows that these speakers produce is nothing short of incredible. I can either turn the volume very low or direct most of the power from my 130 watts per channel onkyo receiver with no distortion or loss of sound quality, in short these speakers are an awesome investment, and I'm completely satisfied with their performance that exceed my expectations that I would expect from the Klipsch Company. |