Magnepan MG-11c's Floorstanding Speakers
Magnepan MG-11c's Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Dec 10, 2018]
meadowz06
Strength:
Incredible imaging. Huge soundstage. Vocals second to none. Weakness:
You will need a sub for really low bass. Purchased: Used
Model Year: 1987
|
[Dec 31, 2001]
Bill
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Unbelievable sound stage, vocals so incredible you would swear they were standing in the room with you.
Weakness:
not really a weakness, but at low volume levels they sound .....well, average First off, these speakers are 12-13 years old. They are completly orignal, right down to the tweed grill coverings. Similar Products Used: This is my first planar speaker |
[Dec 16, 1998]
Mike Royer
an Audiophile
Some time ago I had submitted a opinion on the Magneplanar MG-2c's. The reason for updating this is a new pair of speaker wires. These cables are the Cardas Golden Cross. I must submit to all who own Maggies, that they have not heard these wonderful speakers until they have auditioned them with the specified Cardas cables. The Cardas cable has allowed the magic that these speakers posess to be truthfully conveyed to the listener. Do enjoy!!! |
[Feb 01, 1999]
Bruce Beckner
an Audio Enthusiast
I bought a pair of these units predecessor (MG-II) in 1977 as part of a general upgrade to the system I had. I wish I still had them. In my experience, these speakers are the only ones that I have owned that reproduced the sound of a piano so well that, if you were in the next room, it sounded like a real piano was playing in the room with the speakers. (I have had various models of B&Ws and currently have Joseph RM 7si signatures.) That feat was accomplished without fancy interconnects or speaker cables. The speaker was powered by a Dyna Stereo 400, with the front end bypassed and a Dyna PAT-5 preamp with replacement op-amps. (Of course the source was vinyl.) I can only imagine what they sound like with today's electronics. Like tubes and vinyl, these speakers score in the midrange. Their bass is extremely well-damped (better than any cone speaker I have heard), but, alas, doesn't do much below about 50 Hz. And they probably don't offer the last word in top-end detail, compared to today's metal dome tweeters. What they offer is a fabulous midrange, complete transparency and a great sense of front-to-back placement. Being dipole radiators, they also don't offer the last word in pinpoint imaging.Their needs are their drawbacks. 1. They need 5-6 feet of free space behind them and an equal distance from the sidewalls. Putting them in a corner or against the backwall destroys the beautiful soundstage and mucks up the sound quality. 2. They need lots of watts. The 200 wpch I fed them seemed about right in a medium-sized room. Even then, they don't play at stomach-socking levels. 3. They're about 6 feet tall, and you shouldn't put anything in front of them. So they dominate the room visually. On the other hand, being panels -- rather than point sources -- they don't follow the inverse square law of loudness. (What that means is that they don't sound appreciably louder close up than at a distance.) |
[Dec 25, 1999]
Eddie Mclaughlan
Casual Listener
Strength:
Very accurate, especially vocals.
Weakness:
Need proper placement in room, which is not always practical. Having only ever used bookshelf speakers, this is my first |