Magnepan MG 3.5 Floorstanding Speakers
Magnepan MG 3.5 Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Jun 15, 1999]
Mart
an Audiophile
I don't understand all the glowing comments about these units. It sounds like a 2.7 with a ribbon of clearly unmatched Q. If the quasi-ribbon midrange made an attempt to sound like a true-ribbon, the result would be OUTSTANDING!! However, the entire XO region is cluttered with IMD from mismatched transients upon recombination of the drivers. |
[Jun 15, 1999]
John
an Audiophile
As the owner of the Maggie 3.3 and having heard the 3.5 many times at a local audio shop, Mart's comments that it sounds like a 2.7 is ridiculous. I heard the 3.5 vs the 2.7 and quite frankly, I never could understand why the Series 2 was developed at all. It did not have the openness or musicality of the 3.5 and yet it was not that much less in price. And interesting that Magnepan has in fact dropped this product line. |
[Feb 24, 1999]
Music lover
an Audiophile
MG 3.5 R are one of the best speakers regardless of price. Transparency, detail, sound picture, dynamics are all world class. The most of dynamic loadspeakers are non comparable here. MG 3.5 R are big bargain for performance they give. Need good amplifier and CD player and about 0,6-2 m of backspace. This is really superb product.(Sorry for poor english) |
[May 14, 1999]
Edo
an Audiophile
Magnepan MG 3.5 R are beautiful sounding loadspeakers. With the right setup, they are just amazing. I am using Swiss Physics amplifier and Wadia 850 CD player. The sound is marvellous by any standard. For the price they are steal. |
[May 19, 1999]
Per
Yes Maggies 3.5 are very,very good sounding loadspeakers. Soundstage is so natural with fantastic transparency and detail. These are among 5 best loadspeakers in the world regardless of price. But, it is important with good amplifier, cables and CD / LP player. & stars if possible. |
[Sep 06, 1998]
John
an Audiophile
I had picked up a set of MGIIIAs some time ago, impressed with the sound of these panels, I took a trip to listen to the MG3.5s.I was floored at the dynamics and realism of the 3.5s, I had asked for the power amp to be the Jadis 200 since my amps on my Maggies are 200 watt tubed amps. |
[Aug 25, 1999]
Jimmy James
an Audiophile
I have owned the 3.5R's for a couple of three years and MGIIIa's for 10 years before that. The 3.5 has been replaced?, upgraded to the 3.6R, supposedly different crossover points and redesigned mid panel section. A review of this speaker may be moot but as they will be available on the used market and the fact that they apparently are not that removed from the 3.6 makes for a great used prospect. At the $3000 original retail price, the only thing that comes close is a similar price point Martin Logan. The ML's I have heard with Krell electronics sound grainy and boomy compared to the Maggies. These Maggies are way smooth. Yes they could stand a tad more bass heft but I will give up that short coming for the overall excelent sound they produce. They are not high db rock-n-roll speakers. They will poop out before a 200watt amp will and will most likely blow fuses. They are a perfect reproducer of jazz from traditional to progressive. After having MGIIIa's for 10 years, I auditioned several box speakers including Wilson Witts, Watt Puppys, B&W, Mirage and Vandersteins. The 3.6 as all Maggies I have heard throw a much bigger more 3D soundstage than any box speaker. Once you own Maggies you can never go back to the box. I would give them a 4.5 with the half speaker deduction being for less bass than ideal. |
[Feb 03, 2000]
Michael Feinstein
Audiophile
Strength:
Very refined sound. Beautiful highs. Monstrous soundstage
Weakness:
Lack of bottom octave, midrange is not the best, lose focus at high volumes, and soundstage, while neat to hear, is too big. Very nice speakers, with lovely, realistic sound. I lived with them for some time, but had to sell them because of the ridiculously large soundstage. It made images far too big and sounded unnatural. I go to the MN orchestra almost weekly and the Maggies, just spread the stage all over, which is not what I hear live. That said, the highs on the speaker were just amazing! About as good as the Inner Sound that I now own, but the midrange of the Maggies was not that great. Quad's, Inner Sound Eros, and Spendor's all have much, much better midrange than the 3.5. If a speaker doesn't have a great midrange, it eventually loses it's luster w/me. It's not a terrible midrange, but there are speakers that definitely beat it, including the much improved 3.6, which I consider a marked improvement over the 3.5 in the midrange. Some don't think the midrange of the 3.5 is a weakness, but all I have to say to them is this- listen to Quad's and you will realize the 3.5's midrange isn't that great. At over 15 yrs. old, the Quad's still have the best midrange bar none, but they, too, have their own problems (i.e., lack of highs). I liked the speaker, but at about 1,000 more, I think the Inner Similar Products Used: Quad ESL-63, Inner Sound Eros, and Spendor mini-monitors. |
[May 22, 2000]
Raj J
Audiophile
Strength:
transparent mids & highs, solid bass reproduction. Best sounding when Bi-amped
Weakness:
requires proper installation and placement. also requires very careful handling, ribbon tweeter can easily damage. I acquired my pair of MG3.5's just a week ago. They had been used for about 10 months, therefore the ribbons were well broken in and settled. The level of accuracy at which the 3.5's are capable of reproducing is mostly apparent with speakers systems in the $10,000 and above range. Therefore, if you get the chance to purchase a pair of either the 3.5's or 3.6s, go for it! You will not be disappointed with your decision. However, please keep in mind, in order for these speakers to sound best or at least what they are capable of, you must place them in a large room or listening hall, and for that matter a dedicated listening environment is preferred. Current placement is in a listening room measuring 30 feet length and 15 feet wide: 4 feet from wall behind, 3 feet from side walls, 8 feet apart and listening distance is 12 feet approximately. I highly recommend these measurements for that magical soundstage the MG3.5's are capable of delivering. Similar Products Used: Apogee caliperII, Martin Logan SL3 & Request, Carver Amazing ribbon system, Quad ESL63, Magnepan 3.3, Infinity Rennaisance 90. |