Meadowlark Audio Kestral Hot Rod Floorstanding Speakers
Meadowlark Audio Kestral Hot Rod Floorstanding Speakers
[Mar 17, 2000]
RG
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
small footprint/blend nicely with decor, soundstage, imaging, price.
Weakness:
slightly colored mid - but we're gettin a bit picky here. one of the easiest to listen to speakers I’ve ever heard. and when you think about what you paid relative to similar sounding stuff, it really puts a smile on your face. very adequate bass, huge soundstage, and excellent imaging and detail. efficient, and easy to play on a bunch of different gear (they will sound better on some systems obviously, but they do well on a wide variety of stuff). unloaded them after a few months when I decided to take another stroll on the high end treadmill, but this was one piece of equipment I hated to see go. Held their value for resale very nicely. |
[Jan 18, 2002]
John
Audio Enthusiast
Aloha, |
[Aug 12, 2001]
Bruno Turkovich
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Transparency,imaging,size
Weakness:
dull sound,weak bass I was not to fond of these speakers. Their sound was rather dull. They never got me intrested in the music I was listening to. There was not a good sense of air with these either. I don't know,maybe I was expecting too much. I saw a number of good reviews,seemed like a speaker I might like,but they just disappointed me. I am sure there are a lot of people that like these,just read the other reviews here. In my opinion, there are other speakers out there that are just more fun to listen to. Ones that got me more invovled in the misic. Similar Products Used: vandrsteen,joseph audio,coincident |
[Oct 17, 1998]
Jim
an Audio Enthusiast
I have had the Kestrals for about 1 month,and the sound just keeps getting better and better. The soundstage seems to go outside and around the speaker area. The imaging and clarity are superb. I don't see how you could do much better at twice the price. |
[Jun 11, 1999]
Steve
an Audio Enthusiast
While I don't own a set, I have been auditioning a lot of equipment on a dealers pair the last two months. These little things are flat out stunning. The source equipment included an Enlightened Audio Design 2000, and the new Plinius 2150 integrated amp, both excellent pieces. The one area where the Kestral Hot Rods excel the most is soundstage presentation. It is just awesome how much space they portray. At about $1500 I don't believe they can be bettered, and I've irritated a lot of dealers listening. They are quite dynamic as well. The only reason I do not own a pair is I can only afford one pair of speakers (at least good ones) and since the Kestrals are, after all, two ways, they won't really blow the windows out of the house. Listening to jazz or opera is nice but every once in a while it's time to annoy the neighbors two blocks over. These really are quite an achievement and as I said, at the price break, likely unbeatable. |
[Oct 03, 1999]
Alan
an Audio Enthusiast
These speakers are astounding. I have auditioned as many speakers in the same price range as I can find, including B&W CDM1, 805, and DM603 version 2, plus various models from Tannoy, Linn, Canton, KEF, Dynaudio, Paradigm, Klipsch, Mission, and Monitor Audio. Of all these speakers, the Meadowlarks are the only ones I can live with long-term in this price range. The sound is open and spacious, without the artificial brightness that seems to come with open- sounding moderately priced speakers. The soft dome tweeter has none of the metallic ringing sound that seems to creep into most metal domes at this price point. Voices are tough to reproduce, but Meadowlark Audio seems to have done a good job with this simple two-way design. The bass is remarkable - I assume the result of a carefully crafted transmission line in a well braced enclosure. The Kestrels have an effortless, non-fatiguing quality that I found in no other speaker at this price. I knew that the Meadowlarks were great when I realized that I stopped thinking about how the speaker sounded and started noticing how the music sounded. I can't remember this happening with any other speaker in this price range. After meticulous auditions at many audio shops, I have come to the conclusion that nothing at a price I can afford will beat the Kestrel Hot Rod so I ordered a pair in just the finish I wanted. I listen to Classical music and some jazz, and tend to seek the most natural sounding equipment I can afford. My listening tests were conducted with an NAD 218/118 combo using DH-Labs interconnects and speaker wire. (Agreed, it's not class-A electronics, but it is the level of equipment that is likely to be used with a pair of speakers listing for $1500 per pair.) This is a 5-star product if ever there was one. |
[Apr 06, 2001]
Ken
Audio Enthusiast
Weakness:
Some detail was missing on the top end. For instance Triangle/bell notes on Loreena McKenitt mummers dance could not be heard I have made it a mission to replace my aging 1978 vintage TangentTM1's (Kef t27 tweeter and B200 midbase). I have been looking for many years and have only recently found speakers to tempt me. All in the $2500.00 range. The Kestral hotrod speakers are in almost every way superior to any thing I have heard, especialy tonal balance and they maintain balance at low levels good for those late night listening wind down sessions. This is often overlooked by reviewers and manufacturers. Similar Products Used: Triangle Antal, Lynn Ninka, Vandersteen 2ce |
[Mar 09, 2001]
Tom Yau
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great degree of transparency, warm non-fatiguing sound, accurate bass, natural sounding high end
Weakness:
Bass extension could be lower although at this price range it provides excellent coverage of the bottom end. I auditioned these speakers with a friend of mine who is a sound engineer and producer. He was looking for speakers in the 1000's range and the salesman recommended the Kestral HR after listening to a pair of Shearwater HR. The immediate difference between the two were extended bass in the Kestral and less transparency. The reason the Kestrals have a better bass extension is probably due to the Kestral being auditioned in a smaller listening room or it was placed better. The transparency of the Shearwaters was not matched by the Kestral, but darn close. A VTL preamp was used with a Conrad Johnson amp. The combination of these three components created a synergy that created a non-fatiguing enjoyable musical (not just sonic) experience. We played Thomas Dolby's Aliens ate My Buick, some classical selection, and some German progressive Techno. The sound of the Kestral was warm and refined, I actually said to myself that these speakers probably cannot handle Techno. I was wrong. These speakers provided a warmth and detail to the sound without giving Techno that club sound (overbright highs and booming bass). I much prefer that sound to the Polk RT200p's that I own. Although I still fel that the POlk RT200p's are more dynamic and has a more defined mid-upper bass and extended low end than the Kestrals when the Polks are placed correctly. Overall an impressive speaker whose strength lies in its transparency and faithful reproduction of sound. Similar Products Used: Vandersteen 2C, JM Lab, Linn, Meadowlark Shearwater Hot Rod, Polk RT 2000p |
[Jan 16, 2001]
JASON
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
SMOOTH HI-END,TIGHT BASS,VERY MUSICAL/FATIGUE FREE SOUND TO THE REVIEWER WHO CLAIMED THE HIGHS WERE "MUTED" I WOULD Similar Products Used: VANDY,B&W,THIEL,MAG |
[Jul 29, 2001]
Ken
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent tonal balance, one of the best midranges I have heard at any price range, silky highs
Weakness:
A little weak in the low bass and the very high treble Just got these speakers after an exhaustive 4 month search. Following was the Kestrel's main competition, in order of how much I liked them: Similar Products Used: See below |