Meadowlark Audio Shearwater Floorstanding Speakers
Meadowlark Audio Shearwater Floorstanding Speakers
[Jun 30, 1999]
David McGehee
an Audio Enthusiast
I recently had the chance to audition this speaker the other day. Don't have any local dealers but was in Dallas, TX. I was very impressed with them. The ScanSpeak tweeter has a more laid back presentation than my B&W bookshelves, but still has good detail. The most noteworthy thing to me is both the integration of the drivers and the great soundstage that is not of the "head in the vise" variety. I usually prefer a metal dome tweeter(like my B&W's, Thiel 1.5, and Platinum Solo) but could live with this speaker for its other strengths. The bass was incredible! This transmission line has to be heard to be believed. Down to 35-40 hz, I think, with a well defined slam. Much cleaner than the midbass of the Paradigm Silver (old version) I heard the same day. Hard to find good midbass! Also, the 7" driver barely moved at moderate levels providing this bass, unlike the B&W N805's I heard, which slightly disturbed me with its driver's huge excursions! Still undecided-like the above mentioned speakers, also Ruark Prologue. Anybody heard the new Thiel SCS3? Please let me know if you have. Overall, Four and a half stars. |
[Sep 06, 1999]
Mark
an Audio Enthusiast
I purchased mine after a 'chance encounter' at an audio store where I was selling my old Naim Nait 3. So it became a trade against a demo pair of Shearwaters. Luckily for me they had been broken in for a while, I suppose. Anyway 15 months later I'm still v.happy with them (my first floorstanders!) |
[Sep 09, 1999]
TS
an Audio Enthusiast
Just came back from auditioning these speakers for a couple hours and wanted to share my thoughts while they're fresh. |
[Sep 07, 1999]
Eric
an Audiophile
As the writer(two below mine) stated, these speakers can be a bit lean. A good SET amp will fix this problem as will any warm sounding amp. Remember, it's all about system synergy!!! By the way, I CAN'T stand reviewers who don't list associated equipment!!! How else are we to judge the comments?? (i.e. using a lean amp like the Symphonia is probably NOT a good idea!! |
[Nov 04, 1999]
Allen McLeod
Audio Enthusiast
Wow, I am surprised at these reveiws! I have to wonder if people go to live performances or listen to real instruments! You know, the sound of music in a natural, REAL space. No one seems to know what that is anymore (maybe Bob below does). By space, I am not talking about an acoustically perfect room or the sound staging of $50,000 electronics. I am refering to what sound does in a real space, like a theatre, club, or grassy hill. Sound reflects. Sound disperses. Sound changes. What that means is that in the real world, whether we like it or not sound is colored. And that is what moves us. That, my freinds, is what I am looking for in my stereo system. I think it is fine to use precise electronics and speakers for live shows, becuase what the audience hears is a colored version of that. In the home, however, the space is too small to colorize the sound. So the sound is left flat, cold, thin and some what lacking. Yes, you might have great articulation, imaging, and dynamics, but none of that does you any good if you do not like what you are hearing. So needless to say, I did not like the Shearwaters, but then again, I do not like any of them other speakers people have mentioned in these reviews, all for the same reason. For some reason, I thought buying expensive, high end equipment would farther my enjoyment of music, I was wrong! I can not wait to sell all this high tech junk and build a low tech stereo out of antique tube radios. I think that will be closer to what I am looking for. |
[Jan 01, 2000]
Karlotta
Audiophile
Strength:
Very precise imaging and soundstage. Great pace and rhythm. Very involving. Easy to drive (even a small solid state integrated will do). Very clear and unfatiguing treble, rich midbass, extension to all but the lowest bass.
Weakness:
Midrange a tad hyper These are a fine pair of floor-standing transmission line speakers. Two-ways with a first order cross-over and time-aligned drivers ensure a great sense of pace and rhythm. These speakers are as musical as you could desire. They are much richer and present MORE of the music than their little brothers, the Kestrels. I have owned both for significant amounts of time and KNOW. |
[Sep 10, 1998]
Jeff Potts
I've gotta agree with Joe's assessment of this speaker. I've been in the market for speakers in the 2 to 3K price range for over a year, and I've tried many, including Thiels, Dynaudio's, B & W's and Vandersteen's. Don't get me wrong - these are all great speakers, but it all depends on your listening tastes. To me, the Shearwater's just got it right. They offer clean, transparent highs, a life like midrange that's scary, and solid, but not overdone - bass, and mostly importantly, a sense of musical rightness. These speakers sing like a bird, and I believe you will have to spend close to twice as much to get so much musical enjoyment. If music is your thing, buy em. You won't be dissappointed. I bought a pair of Shearwater "Hot Rods", which have upgraded parts for an additional $500. I love em", and they are attactive to look at too! |
[Feb 26, 2001]
Todd Goldenberg
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
beautiful vocals and terrific imaging
Weakness:
non-fatiguing sound makes me want to stay at my friend's home and just keep listening for hours and hours! I do not own these speakers, but have listened to them extensively at a friend's home. I agree with John's review below. I would just like to add that these speakers sound absolutely awesome with Annie Lennox and The Grateful Dead! Similar Products Used: B&W N804 and Dynaudio 1.8 mkII |
[Feb 26, 2001]
john swanberg
Audiophile
Strength:
imaging (stays within the speakers mostly), coherence of sound, detailed bass, non-fatiguing highs, details, midrange
Weakness:
takes some power to sound best (I am using a Jolida 60 watt per channel integrated, which I would say is a minimum), a bigger solid state amp would give more bass, long time before really sounding good I almost didn't buy the Shearwaters Hot Rods. The first couple of times I heard the speakers (they were not broken in), I was thoroughly unimpressed. I thought the Kestrels sounded much better, but didn't have enough detail for me. I ultimately heard them fully broken in being driven by a Cary integrated tube amp. There was finally bass that you could feel; there was a coherence to the sound from the top to the bottom; there was detail throughout the soundstage. When you audition the speakers, make sure they are broken in to hear them at its best. Tube amplifiers give a glorious midrange; solid state gives a deeper bass; you can tell the difference between upstream components readily (including wire, nordost works well for me). Highly recomended for jazz, blues, classical; a little too clean for grunge, but led zep and sabbath works well. Similar Products Used: thiell 1.5, thiell 2.3, b & w 805, b & w 804, dynaudio audience 70, dunaudio 1.8 mkII, platinum solo (auditioned) |
[Feb 06, 1999]
rt
an Audio Enthusiast
While in a local audio shop that I have frequented for the past several years (though haven't been back much since because I haven't had the funds), I thought I'd check out their new speaker lines to see what sounded good. They had a pair of Meadowlark Kestrals set up next to some Hales revelations 2s, several Castle speakers, energy, and some old Thiels. As we flipped through the speakers, the Kestrals were the only ones that snapped my head. They sounded GOOD for such a small speaker. Where was all the bass coming from? The speaker! I had to check to make sure the energy subwoofer wasn't on. Whoa! I really started to get excited. |