Mission 751 Floorstanding Speakers
Mission 751 Floorstanding Speakers
[Mar 21, 1998]
Fred Svinin
an Audio Enthusiast
Two month ago I replaced my KEF Coda 7 with a pair of Mission 751 speakers. Before this change I searched for this replacement reading different audio magazines and websites. I understood that for my small room I need compact speakers to put them on the stands for my system consisted of Marants 63 MKII & NAD 304 and the price of these speakers must be around $600. I tested MS 10i Classic, B&W 601, Castle Tay and didn’t like them because of different reasons. At first I liked Ìission 751 for their specifications and performance but when I listened to them in hi-fi shops I was disappointed because of lifeless, boring sound without any imaging and space. It looked so before I took a pair of them home for test. By the way, the problem is that in my city St.-Petersburg (the 2-nd in Russia, about 5 million people) there is only 5 or 6 audio shops based on hi-fi technics and only 1 allows you to take the components home for test for 1 day. Others ask you to pay for it about 3-5% of its price. There I fixed them on Atacama SE 24 stands and connected using quality bi-wired speaker cable Mission Quartet with amp and listened to them. During playing the first CD I heard everything what I wanted to get from classical music – it separated musicians in space and very flat, ascetic sound which reproduces true soul of music. That day I played different music and was always glad to listen to it. It seemed like I heard my jazz and classic collection it for the first time! The same was with an old good rock. The rhythm of music was always excellent. There is only one problem – one may say that it needs more bass but you can compensate it using your active subwoofer. I am using Cervin-Vega! HT12PRW subwoofer and like it. So you can’t get 100% perfect sound but I am proud to say that with Mission 751 I got about 95%! |
[Jun 21, 1998]
Joseph C. Ramon
an Audiophile
A follow-up on my earlier review below (a'la Stereophile). After living with the Magnepalanar SMGcs/REL for some time, I ended up liking my old |
[Aug 03, 1998]
G MAN
an Audio Enthusiast
I listened and researched for two months before choosing the 751's. They were easily the best speaker in their price range.If you like percussion, look no further. These little speakers give the tightest, fastest, most accurate representation of percussion I have ever heard. The sound is very clear and accurate. |
[Jun 15, 1998]
Joseph Ramon
an Audiophile
I had these speakers for more than 2 years and I just wanna say thatthese are excellent speakers, but not on their own. Coupled with the |
[Jul 19, 1998]
hifreaks
an Audiophile
Simply excellent, fab image and presence...Just taste the music in the best way. |
[Jul 28, 1998]
kin soon
an Audio Enthusiast
I've been living with a pair of 751's for a year now. Source is a Marantz CD-63IIKI and amplification is an old Pioneer A400-X. Here's a good example of how NOT to assemble a system. They may be respectable components individually, but don't quite work together as a system. Bass is thin and there's a peaky upper midrange that gets really bad on some vocal tracks. Treble is tizzy rather than silky and open, and there's a hole in the upper-bass/lower-midrange. Granted, it can sound rather good with nicely recorded discs. Imaging is fair. I think the whole combination sounds rather contrived -- it just doesn't let the music flow as it should. I have tried replacing the Pioneer with an Arcam Alpha 8 (borrowed) and it helps somewhat, but it still not entirely satisfactory. |
[Nov 21, 1998]
Brian Steele
an Audio Enthusiast
First of all, I think that "audiophile" has become a somewhat derogatory term, used these days to refer to those chaps who would rather spend their $$$$ on expensive cables rather than where it makes the most difference - on the speakers! So I've labelled myself an "audio enthusiast" for this review. |
[Sep 01, 1999]
IBA
an Audiophile
After having Mission 780 speakers for about eight years I decided that time has come to look for new speakers. I did enjoy the 780 very much but during the years I felt their weak points, their inability the transfer a full orchestra sound and to deliver the high notes of violin. The Mission 780 are small speakers and were sitting on the shelf near the wall, but this location was perfect in my small working room. Obviously I looked for similar small size speakers. |
[Feb 26, 2001]
Jonathan Weeks
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Imaging,presence, sweet, clear mid-range and treble, superb reproduction of vocals.
Weakness:
limited bass weight, new ones hard to find I bought the freedomised Mission 751's about 6 months ago at an end-of-line discounted price. These speakers represent a true bargain, giving such fine sound quality for the price. They are fed by an Arcam Alpha 1 CD player and NAD 3240pe amplifier; older, budget source components that nevertheless give me a smooth, well-focused and satisfyingly sweet and detailed sound when matched with these Missions. Although bass has less presence than I'd like, mid-range frequencies are superbly reproduced and treble sounds much sweeter and more open than my previous speakers (Mission 761). Particularly good for jazz recordings, where saxophone and trumpet sound so clear and convincing. Vocals sound marvellous, having such presence and lifelike clarity. If you are in the market for quality bookshelf speakers and find a pair of these speakers still for sale (discontinued a while back), please audition them, as I think they offer so much for so little. |
[Sep 17, 1997]
G.W. Clarke
an Audio Enthusiast
Having stubbornly held on to a pair of twenty-year-old JR 149's until they wereliterally falling apart, I bit the bullet and bought a new pair of high-quality small |